Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    38,000

    Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    • Seeing Red: Here's another intriguing name to add to your deadline shopping list:

    Aaron Harang.

    Two clubs that have spoken with the Reds in recent days report that, surprisingly, Harang is not on their untouchables list. According to one team, the Reds' latest stance is that they'll discuss anybody on the roster except Jay Bruce, Edinson Volquez, Johnny Cueto, Joey Votto and Edwin Encarnacion.

    So that means Harang is a guy for whom they'll at least accept bids. But just understand they'll have to be very, very large bids.

    "For them to make that move," said an official of one club, "you'd really have to stagger them because to their fans, that's waving the white flag. So you'd have to come at them with three strong, above-average-type prospects. And even then, I'm not sure they'd say yes. But if you could get him, you've got the best 3-10 pitcher in baseball."

    True, Harang's record might be an unsightly 3-10. But look beyond that, and you'll see he'd still be a formidable addition to any rotation.

    He has made 11 quality starts (one more than Cole Hamels). His record reflects the third-worst run support in the big leagues (2.96 runs per nine innings). He has a sub-4.00 home ERA in his pitcher's-nightmare park. And he's third in the NL in innings pitched. So he won't be priced like your average 3-10 commodity.

    • Dunn deal: We heard from three different teams this week that the Reds have "zero" takers on Adam Dunn. Hard to believe Dunn wouldn't be a fit for an AL team with a lineup deep enough that he wouldn't have to be a middle-of-the-order presence.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/column...page=rumblings


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,227

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    I like it.

    Then, CC or bust in 2009.

  4. #3
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    35,142

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    Fine, more Dunn for ourselves.
    “I don’t care,” Votto said of passing his friend and former teammate. “He’s in the past. Bye-bye, Jay.”

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    princeton, nj
    Posts
    9,481

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    poor guy. he wants to stay, and he knows how success goes over in this clubhouse, so he's been trying to fit in better by sucking.


  6. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    38,000

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    I would only trade Harang for a huge return. He could probably fetch a similar package to a CC Sabathia considering he' signed cheaply for the next few years. Here's some deals I would consider:

    Yankees: Phil Hughes, Austin Jackson, and Jesus Montero.

    Red Sox: Michael Bowden/Justin Masterson, Lars Anderson, and either Jed Lowrie/Brandon Moss.

    Braves: Jason Heyward, Tommy Hanson, and Charlie Morton.

    Phillies: Carlos Carrasco, Lou Marson, Adrian Cardenas, and Dominic Brown.

  7. #6
    Member Homer Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    4,700

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    Yeah it would have to be a Bartolo Colon like deal for me to go along (Indians traded Colon to Expos for Sizemore/B-Phil/Cliff Lee, I believe).

  8. #7
    A Pleasure to Burn Joseph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Avenue
    Posts
    8,613

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    Dealing Harang for a large return is exactly the kind of thinking this team needs to pursue assuming they are willing to get rid of the actual bad performers on the roster as well. If they aren't, then dealing Harang only sets us back another decade.

    Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
    Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
    Chicago Blackhawks - 10, 13, 15
    University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
    Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98


    “Everything that happens before Death is what counts.”
    ― Ray Bradbury, Something Wicked This Way Comes

  9. #8
    Hot Stove Season HotCorner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    The 513
    Posts
    2,183

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    I find it intriguing that Brandon Phillips' name is not on the untouchables list. Here's a 30/30, gold glove caliber 2B in his mid-twenties. I'd imagine the haul for him would be nice too.

  10. #9
    We are the angry mob cincyinco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    The 303
    Posts
    3,801

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    Tampa is winning. Are they a target? Harang isn't exactly old.
    "I hate to advocate chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone... But they've always worked for me."

    -Hunter S. Thompson

  11. #10
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,450

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    Harang, Hairston, and Weathers for Kemp and LaRoche. Sign CC. Move Votto to LF and EE to 1B. I like it!
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  12. #11
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,450

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    Quote Originally Posted by HotCorner View Post
    I find it intriguing that Brandon Phillips' name is not on the untouchables list. Here's a 30/30, gold glove caliber 2B in his mid-twenties. I'd imagine the haul for him would be nice too.
    Once a player starts making market level money, he has to be a unique talent in order to be untouchable. I agree, it would be interesting to see what kind of offers he'd generate.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Newport Beach, CA
    Posts
    8,069

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    "For them to make that move," said an official of one club, "you'd really have to stagger them because to their fans, that's waving the white flag."

    Huh? That flag has been waving so long that it's more tattered than the Star Spangled Banner at Ft. Sumter.

    Rem

  14. #13
    Churlish Johnny Footstool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    13,881

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    Should have dealt him prior to last season. His stock was even higher then.
    "I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful

  15. #14
    Member Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,544

    CC

    CC looks incredibly out of shape and once he gets a LTC he'll become Cecil Fielderesque. Pass.
    .

  16. #15
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Jayson Stark says Aaron Harang is not untouchable

    Harang to Tampa Bay for Desmond Jennings, Reid Brignac, Jeremy Hellickson and Alexander Cobb? Hows that look?


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator