Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Explain this to me, folks

  1. #1
    Et tu, Brutus? Brutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    10,593

    Explain this to me, folks

    Jayson Stark's Rumblings

    Seeing Red: Here's another intriguing name to add to your deadline shopping list:

    Aaron Harang.

    Two clubs that have spoken with the Reds in recent days report that, surprisingly, Harang is not on their untouchables list. According to one team, the Reds' latest stance is that they'll discuss anybody on the roster except Jay Bruce, Edinson Volquez, Johnny Cueto, Joey Votto and Edwin Encarnacion.

    So that means Harang is a guy for whom they'll at least accept bids. But just understand they'll have to be very, very large bids.

    "For them to make that move," said an official of one club, "you'd really have to stagger them because to their fans, that's waving the white flag. So you'd have to come at them with three strong, above-average-type prospects. And even then, I'm not sure they'd say yes. But if you could get him, you've got the best 3-10 pitcher in baseball."

    True, Harang's record might be an unsightly 3-10. But look beyond that, and you'll see he'd still be a formidable addition to any rotation.

    He has made 11 quality starts (one more than Cole Hamels). His record reflects the third-worst run support in the big leagues (2.96 runs per nine innings). He has a sub-4.00 home ERA in his pitcher's-nightmare park. And he's third in the NL in innings pitched. So he won't be priced like your average 3-10 commodity.

    Dunn deal: We heard from three different teams this week that the Reds have "zero" takers on Adam Dunn. Hard to believe Dunn wouldn't be a fit for an AL team with a lineup deep enough that he wouldn't have to be a middle-of-the-order presence.
    I'm a big fan of Sabermetric stats. Big fan.

    I've done the correlation testing from Runs Scored to OPS, Gross Production Average, Runs Created and many of the other prominent metrics that correlate more closely to run production than does batting average.

    But if Adam Dunn, in his inflated On-Base Percentage, extreme power and run-creating OPS cannot find any takers in all of baseball, then perhaps his batting average, strikeout rate, inability to drive in runners and marginal defense are all still more relevant than many Reds' fans would like to admit.

    Dunn is valuable. I will not deny that, whatsoever. But when you (reportedly) can't even find a taker for him, that tells me that Dunn is still very much a giant exception to what we now know about baseball production.

    Certainly salary and his being a free agent at year's end have to be a concern, but never before has that stopped teams from taking on large contracts for talented players. And I would surmise that sabermetrics are now in a large majority of front offices around baseball, so we can't pass this off as the traditionalist general managers taking a pass on less important statistics.

    To me, this is proof that some of the Reds' fan base has over-inflated Dunn's value, even relative to SABR principals - which I do have the utmost respect for.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    539

    Re: Explain this to me, folks

    I'm sure there are takers, just not offering what the Reds would like in return.

    One aspect of the game that you left out is his defense. Often forgotten when talking sabermetrics simple because there is no good numerical way to rate a players offensive ability.

    Many keep bringing Jr's name up in a possible deal with the Rays. I think Dunn would be a better move for them to fill their need at DH.

    On Harang: I would HATE for the Reds to trade him because to me that means they are throwing in the towel for next season as well. Its not as if Harang is some old broken down vet. Hes struggling and has a sub 4.00 ERA! The only true strength the Reds have in my mind is the 1-2 punch of Harang and Voquez at the top of the rotation. Other than that the rotation is filled with potential and inconsistency up to this point in their careers. (Cueto, Thompson, Bailey).
    Last edited by Orodle; 07-03-2008 at 05:00 PM.

  4. #3
    Et tu, Brutus? Brutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    10,593

    Re: Explain this to me, folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Orodle View Post
    I'm sure there are takers, just not offering what the Reds would like in return.

    One aspect of the game that you left out is his defense. Often forgotten when talking sabermetrics simple because there is no good numerical way to rate a players offensive ability.

    Many keep bringing Jr's name up in a possible deal with the Rays. I think Dunn would be a better move for them to fill their need at DH.
    Actually I did cite "marginal defense" in the list of his perceived flaws that could be contributing to value.

    As far as expectations for a return, I don't believe the Reds have their sights set very high for Dunn. While I'm sure Walt Jocketty won't trade him away for a bag of peanuts and a Dodger Dog, I sincerely doubt they're demanding a ransom as a stipulate of his trade. If Jocketty has no intentions of re-signing Dunn, I imagine he would rather trade him than settle for a sandwich draft pick.

    If in fact it comes out that the Reds can't find any takers because they're asking too much, I'll stand corrected. Thus far, however, I've not necessarily seen any sort of report that suggests that.

  5. #4
    Winning the Human Race TheBigLebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Titletown, FL
    Posts
    3,857

    Re: Explain this to me, folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Orodle View Post
    I'm sure there are takers, just not offering what the Reds would like in return.

    One aspect of the game that you left out is his defense. Often forgotten when talking sabermetrics simple because there is no good numerical way to rate a players offensive ability.

    Many keep bringing Jr's name up in a possible deal with the Rays. I think Dunn would be a better move for them to fill their need at DH.

    On Harang: I would HATE for the Reds to trade him because to me that means they are throwing in the towel for next season as well. Its not as if Harang is some old broken down vet. Hes struggling and has a sub 4.00 ERA! The only true strength the Reds have in my mind is the 1-2 punch of Harang and Voquez at the top of the rotation. Other than that the rotation is filled with potential and inconsistency up to this point in their careers. (Cueto, Thompson, Bailey).
    I agree that Reds fans tend to over-value Dunn, especially the SABR-savvy fans. I just don't think there's a huge market out there for the guy.

    Agree as well on Harang. I think trading him would be a colossal mistake unless the return is simply mind-blowing. However, one minor correction - yes, Harang IS struggling, but his era is not sub-4.00. It's over 4.
    Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available.

  6. #5
    Et tu, Brutus? Brutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    10,593

    Re: Explain this to me, folks

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBigLebowski View Post
    I agree that Reds fans tend to over-value Dunn, especially the SABR-savvy fans. I just don't think there's a huge market out there for the guy.

    Agree as well on Harang. I think trading him would be a colossal mistake unless the return is simply mind-blowing. However, one minor correction - yes, Harang IS struggling, but his era is not sub-4.00. It's over 4.
    I forgot to address the Harang portion of the article, but absolutely I wouldn't be trading him unless I'm blown away.

    I don't know how others feel, but actually I am of the opinion that shedding Griffey and Dunn's salary as well as Ryan Freel and Bronson Arroyo would free up a ton of room for the Reds to go all-out in pursuit of some quality free agents (Orlando Hudson, C.C. Sabathia, Rod Barajas, etc.)

    With some improvements to the staff (one more quality starter and a few solid relievers, which are an abundance on the market this offseason) and some dependable outfielders to replace the departing, the Reds can be a contender as soon as next season. For that reason, I think Brandon Phillips and Harang need to remain Reds for the immediate future - as they can be part of a very strong core.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    866

    Re: Explain this to me, folks

    Dunn has no takers.. I think we have talked about this here many many many times...... and people keep saying there is such a market for him..

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    88

    Re: Explain this to me, folks

    No takers for such a magical player like Dunn? What a shock. Actually, it's not. It's been the same story for several years.

  9. #8
    The Future GoReds33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    2,463

    Re: Explain this to me, folks

    Harang's ERA is 4.47. He's gotten crushed this year. I hate selling so low on him, with all the success he's had in the past. We need to hold onto him one more year, and if he isn't producing then, it's probably time for a change of scenery.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    3,640

    Re: Explain this to me, folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Nuxhall41 View Post
    No takers for such a magical player like Dunn? What a shock. Actually, it's not. It's been the same story for several years.
    But he is going to sign a 4 year 75 million dollar deal in the off-season once the bidding war for his services start.
    I was in the ORG once, best 6 months of my life.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Springfield
    Posts
    642

    Re: Explain this to me, folks

    Quote Originally Posted by redsfanmia View Post
    But he is going to sign a 4 year 75 million dollar deal in the off-season once the bidding war for his services start.
    As long as the Reds are not paying the 75 mil I could care less.Thats just to much for a player with so many holes in his game

  12. #11
    The Future is Now Ghosts of 1990's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    4,053

    Re: Explain this to me, folks

    There's takers for Dunn, just not for the asking price we're commanding, which is good. He shouldn't be given away. Like it or not, Adam Dunn's don't come along often in this game; and that is a fact.
    2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9
    2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
    2013 Attendance Record: 5-2 2014 Attendance Record: 3-1


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25