Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Jim Edmonds

  1. #1
    THAT'S A FACT JACK!! GAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Bellefontaine, Ohio
    Posts
    26,659

    Jim Edmonds

    I know how much everyone loves Edmonds on here. So I know this will be a "barn burner" discussion on here; but a co-worker brought this up yesterday.

    The Cubs signed Edmonds back in May since his release from SD. He's not an everyday player, that is obvious. The Cubs needed help in the OF with the continuing woes with Soriano.

    But what big risk did they take? He passed a physical first, and they are paying him $284,000, the pro-rated amount of the minimum salary. San Diego and St. Louis are responsible for the rest of the $7.7 million he’s owed this year.

    And since being a Cub (42 games)... .260 BA .362 OB% .520 SLG% .882 OPS.

    Disadvantage: another LH'd bat

    And I don't care what anyone says, or how much how anyone may personally dislike the guy, he was one of the premier CFers in the last decade.

    I'm looking '08 only.

    The minimal financial investment taken, and that he could have been used to strengthen our bench (dump Valentin), and yes, could have taken some of the pressure off of Bruce when it is needed, and even tutored/helped Bruce (which I'm sure, or hoping, Jr is also doing).

    A bad move? Why?

    If nothing else.... it would give George Grande something to talk about during the games a he slobbered all over his mike.
    "panic" only comes from having real expectations

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,693

    Re: Jim Edmonds

    Signing Edmonds may have been a good move. He's no longer the CF he once was, but hasn't fallen off the way Griffey has. Edmonds and SD were a poor fit. The huge OF in SD and the rest of NL west (including Colorado where the power numbers obscure the massive size of the OF out there) exposed his reduced range and killed his power numbers at the plate.

    In Wrigley (as would have been the case in GABP), the OF isn't so big, which lessens the defensive issues and helps his offense. Edmonds OPS at home is .802 with only a .186 BABIP while on the road a .681 OPS with a .290 BABIP. (Those numbers aren't pure since his SD home games are included). Other NL Central parks (Like Houston) are also a good fit. Lou has done a good job of letting him sit against LH (OPS .532 against LH pitching in only 35 PA), but has used him too much on the road IMO (154 road PA versus 97 at home). Playing him at home and in smaller road parks against only RH pitching with a more rangey defender playing in the bigger OFs maximizes his declining skillset and creates a pretty solid part time player. Just a good fit in Wrigley that wouldn't have worked everywhere. I'd wonder if he would have had the same success between Dunn and Griffey as he has had between the speedy Soriano and Fokudome. I'm guessing that may have been an issue here and the wear and tear on his legs would probably effect his offense.
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS

  4. #3
    Member hebroncougar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,216

    Re: Jim Edmonds

    Signing Edmonds was a low risk, decent reward for the Cubs with their lineup being as RH dominant as it is. They needed a LH bat.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    10,523

    Re: Jim Edmonds

    I'm not sure if you are asking why we didn't sign him?

    Edmonds went to the Cubs becuase he wanted to be in a pennant race and stick it to the Cards. He would have always chosen the Cubs over us for that reason.

  6. #5
    Member Jpup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Southern KY
    Posts
    6,967

    Re: Jim Edmonds

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    I'm not sure if you are asking why we didn't sign him?

    Edmonds went to the Cubs becuase he wanted to be in a pennant race and stick it to the Cards. He would have always chosen the Cubs over us for that reason.
    George says he called Walt first. I would not have wanted him for free. The Reds have enough players that should retire.
    "My mission is to be the ray of hope, the guy who stands out there on that beautiful field and owns up to his mistakes and lets people know it's never completely hopeless, no matter how bad it seems at the time. I have a platform and a message, and now I go to bed at night, sober and happy, praying I can be a good messenger." -Josh Hamilton

  7. #6
    THAT'S A FACT JACK!! GAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Bellefontaine, Ohio
    Posts
    26,659

    Re: Jim Edmonds

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    I'm not sure if you are asking why we didn't sign him?
    No... I'm not saying we "missed the boat" or anything. Just wondering if we should have pursued him since he was such a low-risk financially, and could have improved our bench and helped take some of the pressure off of Bruce. Nothing more.

    I'm not looking past '08 on this.

    Edmonds went to the Cubs because he wanted to be in a pennant race and stick it to the Cards. He would have always chosen the Cubs over us for that reason.
    He went to the Cubs because they came calling.

    And just as Jpup has stated....
    Quote Originally Posted by Jpup View Post
    George says he called Walt first.
    It appears Edmonds initially called Walt, and Walt said no thanks. So the opportunity was there to have gotten him before the Cub's offer.

    I'm not saying it was a huge blunder or anything by Walt or the Reds.... just should we have seriously considered it for the '08 season and the low financial risk (nothing more).
    "panic" only comes from having real expectations

  8. #7
    Worst Behavior. reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,255

    Re: Jim Edmonds

    Does Edmonds still play a good defensive CF?
    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Let's face it, you mis-hit the bun with the mustard squirter, no one will really care.

  9. #8
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    7,134

    Re: Jim Edmonds

    I was interested in Jimmy, but what's done is done.
    "Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement."

  10. #9
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,693

    Re: Jim Edmonds

    Quote Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
    Does Edmonds still play a good defensive CF?
    About as good as anyone the Reds have not named Patterson. BUt I really think running between Griffey and Dunn with that fly ball pitching staff would have taken too much out of him for him to be successful here.
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS

  11. #10
    Member Jpup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Southern KY
    Posts
    6,967

    Re: Jim Edmonds

    Quote Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
    Does Edmonds still play a good defensive CF?
    no. I would put him below average. If he can get to it, he will catch it, but he's getting very slow.
    "My mission is to be the ray of hope, the guy who stands out there on that beautiful field and owns up to his mistakes and lets people know it's never completely hopeless, no matter how bad it seems at the time. I have a platform and a message, and now I go to bed at night, sober and happy, praying I can be a good messenger." -Josh Hamilton


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25