Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

  1. #1
    Et tu, Brutus? Brutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    10,592

    Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    Just a couple of weeks after Barry Bonds' agent, Jeff Borris, told ESPN that Bonds was unlikely to find a team to play for in 2008, it looks like there might be an interested party.

    Today, ESPN is reporting that in a closed-door meeting of Yankees' brass, the name of Barry Bonds was to be discussed as a possible acquisition.


    Will Yankes Buy Bonds?


    Most hated team with the most hated player. Seems like a perfect fit, doesn't it?

    I actually don't think this will wind up coming to fruition, but in a sadistic sort of way, I want it to.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    ZCTRMTP!!!!! texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,822

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    Back in early-to-mid June there was an article stating that Bonds was willing to play at the pro-rated minimum. Now I know Bonds has done steroids and I know that he can be a jerk. But I also know that very few players can put up the numbers Bonds has. The Reds should have pounced on that offer (if it was legit). Give Bonds six or seven weeks to show that he can still rake and I'll bet the Reds could have swapped him for something of value at the trade deadline. And I am equally certain that Bonds would have had no problem moving to a contender.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    170

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    Quote Originally Posted by texasdave View Post
    Back in early-to-mid June there was an article stating that Bonds was willing to play at the pro-rated minimum. Now I know Bonds has done steroids and I know that he can be a jerk. But I also know that very few players can put up the numbers Bonds has. The Reds should have pounced on that offer (if it was legit). Give Bonds six or seven weeks to show that he can still rake and I'll bet the Reds could have swapped him for something of value at the trade deadline. And I am equally certain that Bonds would have had no problem moving to a contender.
    No question that Bonds can still swing a bat. I just wouldn't want him in my clubhouse for any reason. It's not that I am looking for choir boys to play on my team either. He is a divisive force in the clubhouse...that is why I wouldn't want him around.

  5. #4
    Firin Away Jr's Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,750

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    I hope he comes back,I must admit watching Giants games isn't the same with out Bonds in the lineup.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    7

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    I think it's bs. Yankees did say they wouldn't leave anything unturned.

    Oh and I got a Griffey stub from when he hit 600 if anyones interested:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=130241547829

  7. #6
    Two-Time Batting Champ Edd Roush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Loveland, OH
    Posts
    3,080

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    While I have absolutely no knowledge of how much club house chemistry translates into winning games, I think adding Bonds could be a major boon to the Yankees offense. Bonds was a freak of nature last year and while he broke the rules, he is still a damn good player. I don't think he would fit well with the Reds (two guys who can only play corner outfield and no DH spot), but he may end up being the player that puts the Yankees over the top.

  8. #7
    Et tu, Brutus? Brutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    10,592

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    Quote Originally Posted by Edd Roush View Post
    While I have absolutely no knowledge of how much club house chemistry translates into winning games, I think adding Bonds could be a major boon to the Yankees offense. Bonds was a freak of nature last year and while he broke the rules, he is still a damn good player. I don't think he would fit well with the Reds (two guys who can only play corner outfield and no DH spot), but he may end up being the player that puts the Yankees over the top.
    Absolutely.

    Even though I think he took steroids (just look at photos from the early 1990's and compare them to 10 years later and see how much his head grew), even before I believed he started taking them, he was a heck of a player - Hall of Fame caliber.

    I guess my point is, while he may never have become the all-time HR leader, I think Barry Bonds is a truly talented players even if he had not (allegedly) taken steroids.

  9. #8
    ZCTRMTP!!!!! texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,822

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    Quote Originally Posted by BlastFurnace View Post
    No question that Bonds can still swing a bat. I just wouldn't want him in my clubhouse for any reason. It's not that I am looking for choir boys to play on my team either. He is a divisive force in the clubhouse...that is why I wouldn't want him around.
    I wouldn't want him long-term either. But if a team like the Reds could sign him at the pro-rated minimum, let him knock the rust off for six weeks and then turn Bonds into a quality prospect at the trading deadline; where is the downside? Could he ruin a club's chemistry in six weeks? I could be wrong.

  10. #9
    The Future is Now Ghosts of 1990's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    4,053

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    let them have him
    2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9
    2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
    2013 Attendance Record: 5-2 2014 Attendance Record: 3-1

  11. #10
    Member improbus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    2,089

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    I heard Bill Simmons on his podcast say that if they sign Bonds they should sign Clemens as well, just to make Skip Bayliss' head explode. If that were to happen, I believe that ESPN would set up a new channel with Pedro Gomez and Roger Cossack heading up the coverage.
    Variatio delectat - Cicero

  12. #11
    The Future GoReds33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    2,463

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    How many of these old guys that play bad defense do the Yankees need?

  13. #12
    Firin Away Jr's Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,750

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    Quote Originally Posted by GoReds33 View Post
    How many of these old guys that play bad defense do the Yankees need?
    Bonds will DH for the Bombers.

  14. #13
    Firin Away Jr's Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,750

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    From what I read via yahoo sports is that the Steinbrenner sons have told Cashman do what you need to do to get players,and that no minor leaguers are untouchable.Question is do they have anything of value left to offer as they have dealt a lot of upper level prospects in other player trades.

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    142

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    In 126 games last year, Barry Bonds did this...


    .276 batting average
    .480 on-base %
    .565 slugging %
    28 home runs
    66 rbi
    75 runs
    132 walks


    I absolutely *despise* the man, but it astonishes me that nobody has jumped all over him yet. And please, spare me the concern over his defensive ability. He plays the same position as Manny Ramirez, for god's sake. If you put him in your lineup, he immediately makes you better.


    And as for the whole clubhouse cancer thing - I think it's overrated. Teams that win always seem to have great chemistry, and those that lose - don't. Clearly not a coincidence.

    The Yankees have never been concerned about taking a risk before (Sidney Ponson and Richie Sexon??? Wow!), so why start being overly cautious now?

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    170

    Re: Yankees Discussing Barry Bonds

    Quote Originally Posted by improbus View Post
    I heard Bill Simmons on his podcast say that if they sign Bonds they should sign Clemens as well, just to make Skip Bayliss' head explode. If that were to happen, I believe that ESPN would set up a new channel with Pedro Gomez and Roger Cossack heading up the coverage.
    If you could guarantee that Bayless's head would lose his mind, I would pay Bonds myself out of my own pocket.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25