Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,197

    wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    Ok...guess I'm looking for opinions...The tv in my family room works just fine. It's a 30 inch portable. I am simply being materialistic and I'm normally not that way. I want a big screen tv. I have already priced a bunch of them at Best Buy and you can get them anywhere from 40-60 inch for around $1,300-2K. I already know I can get a loan and have it paid in in a year or less(We only owe 6 payments left on a 460.00 a month van so paying it off soon shouldn't be an issue). The wife wanted new carpet and tile with the stimulus check and thats what we got and now I kinda feel like it's my turn...I love my wife and kids but sometimes you gotta take care of yourself too???(Need some guys out there to tell me to go thru with this)

  2. #2
    Score Early, Score Often gonelong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    4,139

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    Life can toss you a curveball. Got hit by a drunk driver at 5:30 pm coming home from work one day. I had just paid off our other vehicle and would have had no car payments. Not so much anymore. AC stopped working yesterday, $175 later the house is cool again.

    Wait 9 months and pay cash for one ... but then yeah, get one.

    GL

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    175

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    Go get the television.

  4. #4
    Member SirFelixCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5,968

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    We have a 65" WD-65831 (Mitsubishi Diamond DLP) in the living room and absolutely love it. Also have a 50" Vizio Plasma in our office which is pretty sweet (gives off a ton of heat though) and a 37" Westinghouse LCD in the bedroom.

    I mention these because each has their own drawbacks...

    -DLP has a lamp inside that can be fickle and is the largest of the bunch. But an incredible picture. Thin viewing angle, if that matters to you.
    -Plasmas can get really hot and give off quite a bit of heat and use a bunch of power
    -LCD doesn't have as good a picture as the DLP/Plasma, but more than acceptable.

    I would HIGHLY recommend getting one as you really don't know what you're missing until you watch a movie or game on them. Just fantastic.

    But, my biggest suggestion is to wait until you can pay cash (just in case) as well as taking a trip over to avsforum.com. That is THE place for all electronic discussion and those people really know their stuff.

    Compare, ask questions, find one and get it!

    Good luck and enjoy!

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,187

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    Quote Originally Posted by SirFelixCat View Post
    We have a 65" WD-65831 (Mitsubishi Diamond DLP) in the living room and absolutely love it. Also have a 50" Vizio Plasma in our office which is pretty sweet (gives off a ton of heat though) and a 37" Westinghouse LCD in the bedroom.

    I mention these because each has their own drawbacks...

    -DLP has a lamp inside that can be fickle and is the largest of the bunch. But an incredible picture. Thin viewing angle, if that matters to you.
    -Plasmas can get really hot and give off quite a bit of heat and use a bunch of power
    -LCD doesn't have as good a picture as the DLP/Plasma, but more than acceptable.

    I would HIGHLY recommend getting one as you really don't know what you're missing until you watch a movie or game on them. Just fantastic.

    But, my biggest suggestion is to wait until you can pay cash (just in case) as well as taking a trip over to avsforum.com. That is THE place for all electronic discussion and those people really know their stuff.

    Compare, ask questions, find one and get it!

    Good luck and enjoy!
    LCD TV's are probably the most economically sound. Plasmas have shorter life expectancies and DLP's have bulbs that blow just like you you said. They can cost quite a bit to replace. I will say that I really like the pictures in LCD TV's myself. The newer Samsungs and Sharps really have great, vibrant pictures. Older LCD's and cheaper brand LCD's have motion blur, but the new ones have all but done away with that. The size of the TV you want will also play into that. DLP's are cheaper when you get into the bigger TV's and really do have a great picture if you are willing to shell out the extra cash for a new bulb every 3-5 years. Plasmas are ones that I would stay away from. One thing I definately suggest looking into with any new TV is a surround sound system. The newer TVs just don't have very good speakers built in. If you bargain enough at the right place (HHGregg especially), you can get a complete set up for the same price as what they originally wanted for the TV itself, or maybe even less.

    I've had the oppurtunity to see and set up a lot of TV's from working with Time Warner. I will tell you that using the settings the way they are right out of the box isn't getting the best out of your TV. Its all personal preference and you should play around with it for a little while as long as you can get around the settings pretty well and have an understanding of what each setting does. If not, just look in the manual or online. People's settings vary from TV to TV for many reasons, so just asking your buddy how he has his set won't help you with yours. A well set up TV is so much better than one just taken out of the box and used. Its like night and day.

    As far as cables for the TV go, don't fall into the overpriced HDMI trap. You don't need the ones they are going to try and sell you. If you want your picture and sound all in one nice tidy cable, HDMI is for you. The belief that it give you better picture and sound is not true IMO. The only advantage it has, which is a good one, is that you get sound and video in one small cable and it looks much cleaner behind your set. Regular RBG cables and an optical audio cable will give you the same results, but more clutter. Its all personal preference, but the thought that HDMI gives you better picture and sound is bunk, IMO. However, I can not tell you how much better one cable looks than 4 rather large ones. The reason I call it the overpriced HDMI trap is because you can get HDMI cables for MUCH cheaper if you know where to look. Tiger Direct has them from 29.99 right now.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Winchester, KY
    Posts
    62

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    Quote Originally Posted by SeeinRed View Post
    LCD TV's are probably the most economically sound. Plasmas have shorter life expectancies and DLP's have bulbs that blow just like you you said. They can cost quite a bit to replace. I will say that I really like the pictures in LCD TV's myself. The newer Samsungs and Sharps really have great, vibrant pictures. Older LCD's and cheaper brand LCD's have motion blur, but the new ones have all but done away with that. The size of the TV you want will also play into that. DLP's are cheaper when you get into the bigger TV's and really do have a great picture if you are willing to shell out the extra cash for a new bulb every 3-5 years. Plasmas are ones that I would stay away from. One thing I definately suggest looking into with any new TV is a surround sound system. The newer TVs just don't have very good speakers built in. If you bargain enough at the right place (HHGregg especially), you can get a complete set up for the same price as what they originally wanted for the TV itself, or maybe even less.

    I've had the oppurtunity to see and set up a lot of TV's from working with Time Warner. I will tell you that using the settings the way they are right out of the box isn't getting the best out of your TV. Its all personal preference and you should play around with it for a little while as long as you can get around the settings pretty well and have an understanding of what each setting does. If not, just look in the manual or online. People's settings vary from TV to TV for many reasons, so just asking your buddy how he has his set won't help you with yours. A well set up TV is so much better than one just taken out of the box and used. Its like night and day.

    As far as cables for the TV go, don't fall into the overpriced HDMI trap. You don't need the ones they are going to try and sell you. If you want your picture and sound all in one nice tidy cable, HDMI is for you. The belief that it give you better picture and sound is not true IMO. The only advantage it has, which is a good one, is that you get sound and video in one small cable and it looks much cleaner behind your set. Regular RBG cables and an optical audio cable will give you the same results, but more clutter. Its all personal preference, but the thought that HDMI gives you better picture and sound is bunk, IMO. However, I can not tell you how much better one cable looks than 4 rather large ones. The reason I call it the overpriced HDMI trap is because you can get HDMI cables for MUCH cheaper if you know where to look. Tiger Direct has them from 29.99 right now.

    If anyone is in the market for HDMI cables, the place undoubtedly to look is monoprice.com, their stuff is top notch and almost unbelievably cheap. I highly recommend them for any type of cable.
    Last edited by danken12; 07-29-2008 at 04:58 PM.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,187

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    Quote Originally Posted by danken12 View Post
    If anyone is in the market for HDMI cables, the place undoubtedly to looks is monoprice.com, their stuff is top notch and almost unbelievably cheap. I highly recommend them for any type of cable.

    Looks like some really good prices... Wow, if the quality is good, I might look into this site more. Thanks.

  8. #8
    Just The Big Picture macro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    The Bluegrass State
    Posts
    6,150

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    Quote Originally Posted by SeeinRed View Post
    Plasmas are ones that I would stay away from.
    Why? Because of the supposed shorter life span? If they last as long as the 60,000 hours they're claiming they will, that will amount to over 27 years at six hours a day of use. Even if they only last half that amount of time, it will exceed the amount of time that most televisions get used anyway.

    We've got some 13 year old TVs that still work, but they're obsolete. The same will go for the stuff that's new today. By the time it wears out, something better will be available anyway.

    For my two cents, a television picture gets no better than plasma.

    Quote Originally Posted by SeeinRed View Post
    Looks like some really good prices... Wow, if the quality is good, I might look into this site more. Thanks.
    Monoprice sells top quality stuff at those amazing prices. I don't know how they do it. And, they don't lowball on the price and then gouge on the shipping. The shipping rates are low, too!

  9. #9
    On the brink wolfboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    is everything
    Posts
    2,687

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    Quote Originally Posted by SeeinRed View Post
    Looks like some really good prices... Wow, if the quality is good, I might look into this site more. Thanks.
    I'm a big monoprice guy as well. The quality is great. In fact, the only cable (optical) that I've had problems with is the one that didn't come from monoprice. Don't get taken to the cleaners on cables.
    How do we know he's not Mel Torme?

  10. #10
    2009: Fail Ltlabner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    7,441

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    I already know I can get a loan and have it paid in in a year or less(We only owe 6 payments left on a 460.00 a month van so paying it off soon shouldn't be an issue).
    Say what you just typed out loud. "I want to borrow money to buy a TV!"

    Serriously? You think that is a good idea?

    BTW, your "only 6 payments" left on the van is $2,760.

    I think this is your answer...

    I am simply being materialistic
    You've got a 30" TV. It's not like you are watching on a 10" black and white unit that gets 3 channels. And even if you were, borrowing money to buy a TV makes about zero sense. Actually, less than zero sense unless it's zero % interest and even then I'd be suspect that the cost of the TV was inflated to cover the difference.

    This is America and obviously you can do what you want. But if you are looking for opinions on whether it makes any sense on any planet to take out a loan to buy a TV it should be pretty obvious that my opinion is that is a DUMB idea on about 10 different levels.
    a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude.

    I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    1,591

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    Quote Originally Posted by Ltlabner View Post
    Say what you just typed out loud. "I want to borrow money to buy a TV!"

    Serriously? You think that is a good idea?
    Agreed completely. Personally, I'm against borrowing money for anything but a house but it seems especially ludicrous to borrow money for an entertainment item. As has been mentioned before, they really aren't that much money that you can't save up for them. Set aside the money and then buy one next February. Usually they are on sale around the super bowl but I'd also expect prives to drop ahead of the February deadline as they flood the market with HDTVs.

    One final note, the zero down - no interest for a year deal is just asking to get screwed. You never know what will happen in that year and those interest payments will be killer when they kick in.

  12. #12
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    13,463

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    The pricing on TVs is lower around the year-end holidays. I would set the money aside for the purchase and pull the trigger on it in December. You might save $100-200 if you wait.

    Although with the analog turnoff looming in February 2009, this could be the year that bucks that trend.
    /r/reds

  13. #13
    Member NJReds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    5,432

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    Quote Originally Posted by Unassisted View Post
    The pricing on TVs is lower around the year-end holidays. I would set the money aside for the purchase and pull the trigger on it in December. You might save $100-200 if you wait.
    And they usually offer 12+ months with 0% financing. You still have to pay off the purchase before the time period is up (or else you get hit with all of the interest) but at least you avoid paying interest for a year or so.
    "The players make the manager, it's never the other way." - Sparky Anderson

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    1,591

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    One other point. Now is not a good time to buy one as the best deals should be from Thanksgiving through the Super Bowl. This should be the hot item this Christmas so I would expect some significant discounts to draw you to certain stores and brands.

  15. #15
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    34,549

    Re: wanting vs. needing--big screen tv

    Closed per BUTLER REDSFAN'S request
    The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25