Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Salty or Laird?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    1,064

    Salty or Laird?

    As Salty and Laird being the only two guys who we have been linked to, it seems one or the other, at the right price, is priority #1 for Walt before the deadline. So my question to you is who would you rather obtain? Salty is younger a switch hitter but is seen as more of an offensive catcher lack much defensive skills. Laird is having a career year hitting around .310 and is much better defensively, but offensively over his career he doesn't project has anything more than a younger David Ross.

    My vote is for Salty as he is the offensive catcher we have lacked for a number of years. Tough he is only hitting .232 this year in part time play, his OBP is .100 points higher at .332. We can keep Ross as the defensive minded catcher and let him and Hanigan battle it out for that spot in ST.

    What say you?

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Attack Cat! OUReds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Athens, Ohio
    Posts
    681

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    I think an offensive David Ross who is above average behind the plate would be a pretty valuable player to have. That being said, I haven't seen enough of Laird to know if that is really the case.

    With Salty, it's a matter of if he going to be able to stick behind the plate. His bat won't play at first very well, nor do we need him there. Higher risk/higher reward.

    I'd lean towards Laird.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    710

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    What good is a defensive minded catcher that isn't a very good defensive catcher?

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    WEST CARROLLTON OHIO
    Posts
    1,273

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    I say which ever one the scouts like the best as that is what they are for to try and pick the best one.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    CHATTANOOGA, TN USA
    Posts
    311

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    I would suppose Salty would cost you more in players to obtain...especially given the Rangers had to drop Tex to get him.

    All other things equal..take Salty and bolster your lineup. Defense is overrated in catching anyways...nobody steals bases anymore. Catch the ball and understand your staff and get the bat and be productive offensively.

    Having a potent attack at catcher offensively really only leaves us at CF and maybe SS (if you go Gonzalez over Keppinger) as inferior offensive players by position.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    619

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    Salty all the way. Watched him a bunch with the Braves. They loved him here but with McCann, you don't need him. He's bad at 1st, and I doubt he feels comfy there. He wants to catch. Young stud catcher named Salty? You gotta love it.

    Half to admit that I know nothing of Laird.

  8. #7
    Winning the Human Race TheBigLebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Titletown, FL
    Posts
    3,851

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    I'd be happy with either. If forced to choose, I say Salty.
    Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available.

  9. #8
    got alil captain in u?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bridgeport Ohio
    Posts
    4,839

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    If Walt calls up the rangers he should first ask for Salty. See what the rangers are willing to take for him if the price is to steep move onto laird. The reds suppossed defensive catching tandem of ross and bako don't exactly do much defensively. So what if Salty or Laird doesn't call a decent game have the dugout call pitches.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    7,525

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    Salty, but I wouldn't think they'd trade him when they just acquired him when they already had Laird.

  11. #10
    Member kpresidente's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,887

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    I'd rather have Ross than Laird. Ross gives a middle-of-the order caliber hitter against lefties (.570 3-year SLG), which makes him a good fit here since that's something we need.

    Of course, I'd rather have Salty than either, but I don't think he's going to be available.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    1,064

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    "The Cincinnati Reds had a scout at the Texas-Oakland game on Saturday in order to take a look at catchers Gerald Laird and Jarrod Saltalamacchia.
    The Rangers are apparently willing to part with one of the two, and the Reds are looking to add a catcher since none of their three catchers are under contract for next season, the Cincinnati Enquirer reports."


    Per ESPN Insider


    Also of note I heard somewhere, that we also had a scout at the Rangers AA game where Ramirez is currently at. Don't know if we had one at their AAA game or not for Teagarden, if not then it would show that I think Walt is really pushing for an offensive minded catcher



    I really think WJ is in hot pursuit of a deal here and this will be one of two moves he makes.

  13. #12
    Member improbus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    2,077

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    Anyone not named Corky Miller, David Ross, Javier Valentin, Paul Bako, Eddie Taubensee, Chad Moeller, Jason LaRue, Benny Santiago, Dane Sardinha, etc....
    Variatio delectat - Cicero

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    1,064

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    We better hope that Laird's hot hitting makes him too hard to get, or hopefully WJ realizes that he is fools gold right now. He has gone 3-3 with a double and an RBI tonight now hitting .321 with a .828 OPS. Now I know that looks tantalizing, but this hitting his coming out of no where.

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Hamersville
    Posts
    586

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    Salty.
    Bowled 9 300 games, semi-retired!

    Nothing like bowling a 300 game

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Mount Sterling, KY
    Posts
    342

    Re: Salty or Laird?

    Give me Salty...


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25