According to mlbtraderumors.com
Why the Reds didn't trade him prior to July 31rst and why he cleared waivers are both a bit of a mystery to me.
According to mlbtraderumors.com
Why the Reds didn't trade him prior to July 31rst and why he cleared waivers are both a bit of a mystery to me.
.
Shocked the Mets didn't put a claim in on him, Weathers could provide some bullpen relief until Wagner gets back.
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
Is it really that unusual for a player not to be traded by the deadline and still clear waivers? I think this is essentially a run of the mill situation, much ado about nothing. He could still be moved since he's cleared waivers.
“In the same way that a baseball season never really begins, it never really ends either.” - Lonnie Wheeler, "Bleachers, A Summer in Wrigley Field"
The Baseball Emporium - Books & Things.
The Baseball Bookstore
http://tsc-sales.com/
http://tscsales.blogspot.com/
http://silverscreenbooks.com/
Weathers had a rough April and May. Since June 1rst he has been very good.
ERA ~2.5 and WHIP ~1.3 despite pitching in front of the Reds 'defense'.
.
Well, now they can trade him to anyone if they want.
Maybe they don't want to though.
A trade of Weathers for a PTBNL and a promotion of Roenicke or Herrera is almost too obvious.
I hadn't looked in a while, but Danny Ra is really dominating. 50.1 IP, 1.79 ERA, 47 K, 9 BB, 38 H, 2 HR. I know he's probably just a short (pardon the pun), middle relief guy, but he clearly doesn't need any more seasoning.
Ramon A. Ramirez has also done pretty well for himself. I'm not real familiar with him -- it looks like we signed him as a 6 year minor league FA. But he's been quite solid. I'd definitely like to see some of these guys in Cincy come September.
Last edited by RedsManRick; 08-20-2008 at 11:59 AM.
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
Cedric 3/24/08It's absolutely pathetic that people can't have an opinion from actually watching games and supplementing that with stats. If you voice an opinion that doesn't fit into a black/white box you will get completely misrepresented and basically called a tobacco chewing traditionalist...
Why trade him for nothing, when he's worth comp picks in next years draft.
Assuming you're willing to risk arbitration. Odds are he'd take it. I'd rather flip him for a prospect and let somebody else offer him arb. If they're willing to offer him arb and get the comp pick if he walks, we should be able to get a halfway decent prospect out it.
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
Pretty risky offering arbitration to guy who likely won't get a multi-year contract from anyone, and would get quite a bit more in arbitration than he will on the open market.
I wish everyone would remember that you have to offer arbitration to be eligible for draft picks. And how that can effect the decision.
I don't think there's the slightest chance we'd offer arbitration to Weathers. Therefore he walks, we get no comp. His clearing waivers means exactly what it seems: no contender thought he was an upgrade for their bullpen.
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |