Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

  1. #1
    Member Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,544

    FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    According to mlbtraderumors.com

    Why the Reds didn't trade him prior to July 31rst and why he cleared waivers are both a bit of a mystery to me.
    .


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Athens, OH
    Posts
    13,572

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by Will M View Post
    Why the Reds didn't trade him prior to July 31rst and why he cleared waivers are both a bit of a mystery to me.
    Seems to me like the latter explains the former. Now you're down to one mystery.
    /r/reds

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Pook's Hill
    Posts
    2,068

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by Will M View Post
    According to mlbtraderumors.com

    Why the Reds didn't trade him prior to July 31rst and why he cleared waivers are both a bit of a mystery to me.
    Because he isn't that valuable of a commodity.

    Smoke and mirrors pitchers usually aren't. Does he get buy on guile and guts or is it mostly luck at this point? I think the rest of baseball has spoken.

  5. #4
    Kmac5 KoryMac5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Waterloo, NY
    Posts
    4,042

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    Shocked the Mets didn't put a claim in on him, Weathers could provide some bullpen relief until Wagner gets back.
    If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.

  6. #5
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    12,908

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    Is it really that unusual for a player not to be traded by the deadline and still clear waivers? I think this is essentially a run of the mill situation, much ado about nothing. He could still be moved since he's cleared waivers.
    “In the same way that a baseball season never really begins, it never really ends either.” - Lonnie Wheeler, "Bleachers, A Summer in Wrigley Field"

    The Baseball Emporium - Books & Things.

    The Baseball Bookstore

    http://tsc-sales.com/
    http://tscsales.blogspot.com/
    http://silverscreenbooks.com/

  7. #6
    Member Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,544

    Since ~ June 1rst

    Weathers had a rough April and May. Since June 1rst he has been very good.
    ERA ~2.5 and WHIP ~1.3 despite pitching in front of the Reds 'defense'.
    .

  8. #7
    Member Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,544

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by redsmetz View Post
    He could still be moved since he's cleared waivers.
    yep. and he should be. the rebuilding Reds of 2009 don't need a 39 year old reliever yet a team in the thick of a pennant race in 2008 could.
    .

  9. #8
    High five!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    6,976

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    Well, now they can trade him to anyone if they want.

    Maybe they don't want to though.

  10. #9
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,445

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    A trade of Weathers for a PTBNL and a promotion of Roenicke or Herrera is almost too obvious.

    I hadn't looked in a while, but Danny Ra is really dominating. 50.1 IP, 1.79 ERA, 47 K, 9 BB, 38 H, 2 HR. I know he's probably just a short (pardon the pun), middle relief guy, but he clearly doesn't need any more seasoning.

    Ramon A. Ramirez has also done pretty well for himself. I'm not real familiar with him -- it looks like we signed him as a 6 year minor league FA. But he's been quite solid. I'd definitely like to see some of these guys in Cincy come September.
    Last edited by RedsManRick; 08-20-2008 at 11:59 AM.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  11. #10
    Passion for the game Team Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    8,120

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    A trade of Weathers for a PTBNL and a promotion of Roenicke is almost too obvious.
    as well as NEEDED! I would go to the park to watch Roenicke pitch.
    It's absolutely pathetic that people can't have an opinion from actually watching games and supplementing that with stats. If you voice an opinion that doesn't fit into a black/white box you will get completely misrepresented and basically called a tobacco chewing traditionalist...
    Cedric 3/24/08

  12. #11
    Member New Fever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    841

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    Why trade him for nothing, when he's worth comp picks in next years draft.

  13. #12
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,807

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by Will M View Post
    yep. and he should be. the rebuilding Reds of 2009 don't need a 39 year old reliever yet a team in the thick of a pennant race in 2008 could.

    I agree. But they will say they need him around for leadership purposes.
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  14. #13
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,445

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by New Fever View Post
    Why trade him for nothing, when he's worth comp picks in next years draft.
    Assuming you're willing to risk arbitration. Odds are he'd take it. I'd rather flip him for a prospect and let somebody else offer him arb. If they're willing to offer him arb and get the comp pick if he walks, we should be able to get a halfway decent prospect out it.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,317

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by New Fever View Post
    Why trade him for nothing, when he's worth comp picks in next years draft.

    Pretty risky offering arbitration to guy who likely won't get a multi-year contract from anyone, and would get quite a bit more in arbitration than he will on the open market.

    I wish everyone would remember that you have to offer arbitration to be eligible for draft picks. And how that can effect the decision.

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    7,342

    Re: FYI - Weathers cleared waivers

    I don't think there's the slightest chance we'd offer arbitration to Weathers. Therefore he walks, we get no comp. His clearing waivers means exactly what it seems: no contender thought he was an upgrade for their bullpen.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator