Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,325

    Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    Just a question from the ham and eggers here in the Sun Deck. Why do so many people still think we'll move him to SS? I'm not saying all of Reds fans want to, but I continually see posts suggesting he move there. He's the best defensive 2nd basemen in the league and you want to move him to SS?

    Awesome.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member DannyB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    803

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    Quote Originally Posted by DTCromer View Post
    Just a question from the ham and eggers here in the Sun Deck. Why do so many people still think we'll move him to SS? I'm not saying all of Reds fans want to, but I continually see posts suggesting he move there. He's the best defensive 2nd basemen in the league and you want to move him to SS?

    Awesome.

    I doubt it will happen but I would like to see it.Phillips could be the best shortstop on the team.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    23

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    I think he came up at short in Cleveland. He joked that he didn't want to play short after all the injuries at short this year. It is much easier to find a second baseman than a shortstop that can hit.

  5. #4
    You're Welcome
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    The Mythological Land of Dayton, OH
    Posts
    407

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    I'm not lobbying hard for Phillips-to-SS or anything, but depending on personnel, I think you at least keep it under consideration so long as you have reason to believe Phillips can play the position (and potentially, play it better than anyone on our current roster).

    Simple matter of flexibility: if you have a guy who could be EITHER a 2B or a SS, then when you go shopping to plug holes in the off-season, you don't have to limit yourself.... you can at least consider that grade-A 2B that's threatening to fall into your lap, rather than insta-passing on him because you "need" a SS (and end up with a grade-C one).

    Same exact thing applies in our outfield, if you ask me... I forget if it was Welsh or Brantley, but one of them was saying that it'd be a crime to already be limiting Jay Bruce to RF next year. He's clearly not the player he's going to be, yet (I hope), and that goes as much for what he can do in the field as what he's been able to show so far at the plate. Bruce *can* play CF, so why not -- in the back of your mind -- leave that mental option open? You're doing the franchise a disservice if you pigeonhole Bruce at a time when he's still malleable, only to go out Roster Shopping and settle for lesser players because your inside-the-box thinking has created a perceived "need" at a spot that could have been addressed from within.

    I mean, it's obviously not a long-term solution, but it's just something to keep in mind if the vagaries of our top-developing minor leaguers mean we have to temporarily move somebody (EE? Votto?) to a corner OF spot. Or if changes in the free agent market make available serviceable corner OFers for only 2-3 year contracts (maybe an aging-but-solid guy like Abreu?). There are at least some ways I can envision it where the Reds' optimal alignment has Bruce in CF for another year or two. Anything to avoid another Patterson Debacle or people honestly proposing that we trade for Juan Pierre.

    Same thing holds with Phillips: you're insane to PUSH him to SS, but if him playing there makes the Reds better, you're even crazier for not considering the move. At this point, so long as Gonzalez comes back strong from the get-go next year, it's probably not even really an issue... but if there are even hints of doubt about him, and you're seriously looking at Keppinger as an everyday option, that's when the Reds'll need to keep an open mind.


    Rick

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    664

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    SS or 2B - the other position needs to be filled too. At this point, we need a whole left side of the infield, so moving him from one position to another really doesn't make a difference.

  7. #6
    You're Welcome
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    The Mythological Land of Dayton, OH
    Posts
    407

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    Quote Originally Posted by LouisvilleCARDS View Post
    SS or 2B - the other position needs to be filled too. Moving him from one position to another really doesn't make a difference.
    Surely that MIGHT be true if our "shopping" for other IF pieces includes players as versatile as Phillips, but consider....

    If the stewardess asks you if you had the steak or the fish, wouldn't you love to be in the position of being able to say "Yes, of course, I had the lasagna"?

    Which is to say: the steak will no doubt be crappy shoe-leather that makes the Waffle House look like Sizzler, and the fish will render you so delirious you're asking young boys if they enjoy gladiator movies, so you're lucky to have that ever-functional lasagna dinner already in your belly.

    Which is also to say: yeah, so I just watched "Airplane!" and a winner is you.

    Point being is that it DOES make a difference when you're looking to plug holes. Assuming that there is some open line of communication with Phillips and an organizational belief that he can play SS very effectively without being a drama queen about it, it has a HUGE impact on how we go about visualizing our roster and who we can and cannot sign. [Again: same deal with Bruce in the OF.]

    Yes, there are certain benefits to saying Phillips is one thing, and one thing only. And in the league's top 3 at that one thing, no small feat. You get stability. But there are other benefits if you're willing to consider Phillips as being top 6 at a DIFFERENT thing or REMAINING top 3 at the same thing when you're fleshing out your roster. You get flexibility. I think the latter is the preferable alternative.

    Again, it's all predicated on the idea that we can establish that Phillips is both able and willing to play SS. But if we do that? Then we no longer have to settle for fish and steak at 2B and SS; we can have tasty, tasty lasagna oozing all over the middle IF, and limit ourselves to selecting only the best fish OR steak from what's available on the open market.

    And stop calling me Shirley....



    Rick
    Last edited by FlightRick; 08-24-2008 at 02:29 AM.

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Virginia Beach
    Posts
    301

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    Why is Phillips batting 3rd? Oh it must be because of his stellar OBP. His ability to limit GIDP's. And his ferocious ability against righties. All of which I am sure Dusty is aware of.

    And why oh why does BP get a pass with Reds fans?

    But yes he should play SS.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    4,703

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    I've not been a big advocate of moving Phillips, simply because he's developed so well at 2B. However, it seems that the Reds are currently wasting a terrific opportunity. Why not play him at SS the rest of the season just to see how it looks? There's nothing to lose, and it could only expand their options. It would also give them a chance to see Keppinger at 2B. Or even Rosales. Not to mention Hairston.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    855

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    Quote Originally Posted by CWRed View Post
    Why is Phillips batting 3rd? Oh it must be because of his stellar OBP. His ability to limit GIDP's. And his ferocious ability against righties. All of which I am sure Dusty is aware of.

    And why oh why does BP get a pass with Reds fans?

    But yes he should play SS.
    I was wondering who would be the next whipping boy on the team now that Dunn and Griffey are gone.
    "I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road." Stephen Hawking

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Virginia Beach
    Posts
    301

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    Quote Originally Posted by redlegz View Post
    I was wondering who would be the next whipping boy on the team now that Dunn and Griffey are gone.
    Not whipping him. Just giving another example why Dusty Baker doesn't realize what he has or doesn't have with his talent (or lack thereof). Phillips should hit 3rd against lefties. And 5th or 6th against righties.

  12. #11
    Member kpresidente's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,053

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    I'm not sure Phillips would be a good SS. His minor league FP at SS was .950, compared with .974 at 2B.

    In all fairness, he's cut down on his errors in general, even at 2B, the last couple seasons. If that translates to SS, you're looking at something close to what we got from AGon, but as I remember, AGon caught a lot of flak around here for his FP.

    Still, their isn't much in the organization as far a SS goes. All of our prospects except Janish seem better suited for 2B, along with Kepp and Hairston.
    Last edited by kpresidente; 08-26-2008 at 06:02 AM.

  13. #12
    Resident PED Expert nemesis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Centerville, Ohio
    Posts
    1,419

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    I would be all for trading a nice package to Colorado for Tulowitzki.

    It would be keeping with the young defensive minded theme (he's only 23 and has only commited 18 errors in the last 2 years). Has shown lots of offensive potential, hit 25 Hr and 99 RBI's last year injury free. Is RIGHT handed and I would gladly give up a Main piece like Arroyo with a prospect package of:

    Bailey/Thompson choice with a Dickerson/Valakia/Dorn/Rosales choice then a Roenicke/Fisher/Watson throw in. Maybe someone like Belisle who could have some value on their pitching staff.

    Tulowitzki, Phillips and Stubbs up the middle would be a black hole for baseballs...

    If we could pry away Iannetta who is only 25 and has only commited 1 ERROR in 1300+ innings in COLORADO it would probaly take this team to the middle of the defensive pack from just those 2.

    Not to mention the offense they could possibly bring from the right side.

    An Opening Day Lineup would look something like this:

    CF - Freel
    LF - Dickerson/FA/Trade
    1B - Votto
    2B - Phillips
    RF - Bruce
    SS - Tulowitzki
    3B - Encarnacion
    C - Iannetta

    With a rotation of:

    Volquez
    Harang
    Cueto
    Owings
    FA / R. Ramierez (Why does everyone over look this kid?)

    By September it could look like this heading into 2010...

    CF - Stubbs
    1B - Alonso
    LF - Votto
    2B - Phillips
    RF - Bruce
    SS - Tulowitzki
    3B - Encarnacion with Frazier in AAA and Soto in AA
    C - Iannetta

    That's assuming the Rockies took Arroyo, Bailey, Roenicke, Belisle, Watson, Valakia and Dorn for both Tulowitzki and Iannetta
    Last edited by nemesis; 08-26-2008 at 10:14 AM. Reason: Oops

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Springfield
    Posts
    642

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    The biggest and only reason for moving BP to short for me is ....... Jeff Keppinger is our starting SS. Other then that I say leave him at 2nd

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    619

    Re: Brandon Phillips at SS. Why?

    Here's a thought, does Philips ability to go to the middle like he just did tonight, add to the range of Kepp at ss? At least enough to justify leaving BP at second? And next year they have to play AGon if healthy.

    If AGon doesn't cut it with the bat, then Kepp is ready. At least one last worry for next year, when there are other bigger problems; CF, another starter, another bp heavy and 3rd base issues.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25