I agree...but would Boston try to outbid the Reds? I'd have to imagine they're going to try pretty hard here and they can probably match if not outbid the Reds unless the Reds wanted to go overboard or give up 1 of the big 4.Originally Posted by jojo
A Martin sweepstakes without Boston participating would seem anticlimactic.
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
Heck, if the Dodgers do sign Jason Varitek, they'd already be going above and beyond to help Boston. The Red Sox can't possibly expect them to do more than that.
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
Remember, the Red Sox have David Ross now.Why in the hell would the Dodgers want to sign Jason Varitek?
They have no need for Jason Varitek.
Ned Coletti is denying the rumors concerning Russell Martin, FWIW.
LINKReports stating that the Dodgers are looking to trade catcher Russell Martin or move him to third base are untrue, Colletti said
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Reply With Quote