Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

  1. #1
    2009: Fail Ltlabner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    7,441

    Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Code:
    NAME	        PA	 OBP	 OUTR	   
    Paul Janish	 89	.270	0.71910	  
    Jeff Keppinger	502	.310	0.68924
    Ramon Hernandez	507	.308	0.68047	  
    Jay Bruce	452	.314	0.67478	  
    B Phillips	609	.312	0.66831	  
    E Encarnacion	582	.340	0.64605	  
    Jerry Hairston	297	.384	0.62626	 
    Joey Votto	589	.368	0.62309	  
    Ryan Hanigan	 98	.367	0.60204	  
    C  Dickerson	122	.413	0.59016	  
    
    Willy Taveras	538	.308	0.67658
    Jermaine Dye	645	.344	0.64496	
    Pat Burrell	645	.367	0.62946	
    Yunel Escobar	587	.366	0.61840
    Jeff Francoeur	653	.294	0.69066
    The 2008 OBP and Out Rates of the players likely to be Reds next year and some of the names that have bandied about so-far this offseason.

    Not looking so promising. Low OBP's and high Out Rates abound with the players likely to get extended playing time. Of the 5 guys who's OBP/OutRates were acceptable, only 2 are likely to repeat their performance (Votto and EE).

    I foresee another season of hacking away at the plate unless some really, really different players are brought in for LF, CF and SS. A new organizational emphasis on patience and working the count wouldn't hurt either.
    Last edited by Ltlabner; 12-20-2008 at 09:45 PM.
    a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude.

    I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West
    Posts
    4,925

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Well, their manager is on record as saying he doesn't care for base-clogging walks and wants them to be aggressive at the plate.

    I don't think organizational patience is going to happen on Dusty's watch.

  4. #3
    2009: Fail Ltlabner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    7,441

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by Always Red View Post
    Well, their manager is on record as saying he doesn't care for base-clogging walks and wants them to be aggressive at the plate.

    I don't think organizational patience is going to happen on Dusty's watch.
    I agree. Its going to have to come from landing players who naturally acquire bases and avoid outs (and who can ignore Dustys's advice).

    If we add an Escobar and Bobby Abreau (IIRC) to the roster and find a different CF than Willy Fricken Traveras then the getting on bases/avoiding outs thing is headed in the right direction. Prob still not enough firepower to close the RS/RA gap but its a step in the right direction.

    But Walt has to fill the roster with better tallent, esp at CF and SS because The Dusty just can't help himself.
    a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude.

    I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate

  5. #4
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West
    Posts
    4,925

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ltlabner View Post
    I agree. Its going to have to come from landing players who naturally acquire bases and avoid outs (and who can ignore Dustys's advice).

    If we add an Escobar and Bobby Abreau (IIRC) to the roster and find a different CF than Willy Fricken Traveras then the getting on bases/avoiding outs thing is headed in the right direction. Prob still not enough firepower to close the RS/RA gap but its a step in the right direction.

    But Walt has to fill the roster with better tallent, esp at CF and SS because The Dusty just can't help himself.
    True.

    I hope for Abreu, but chuckle at all the angst about Taveras- he's not a Red, yet.

    I think Walt and Dusty are two different guys. Dusty pines for Taveras, and Walt is smarter than that. I hope.

    Walt did not hire Dusty. I try to remember that.

  6. #5
    BobC, get a legit F.O.! Mario-Rijo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Springfield, Ohio
    Posts
    9,052

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Granted I now have a better understanding of what it takes to score runs and I would rather have guys who are willing to be more disciplined. But there have been teams who haven't been great walking teams and have done just fine. Take the '90 Reds for example sure they were maybe a slightly better walking group as a unit but man for man none of them were out there attempting to work walks. Granted they were propped up by stellar defense, speed and lights out pitching, but they just didn't contend, they won a w/s and never fell out of 1st place. They had 4 guys who hit into double digit, double plays even. Heck they didn't even slug all that well, not one guy over .500 slugging. They had 1 starter over a .350 OBP and 2 platoon guys.

    BA/OBP
    Larkin - .301/.358
    Morris - .340/.381 (336 PA's)
    Braggs - .299/.385 (362 PA's)
    "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

    --Woody Hayes

  7. #6
    Member red-in-la's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Santa Paula, CA
    Posts
    6,536

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ltlabner View Post
    Code:
    NAME	        PA	 OBP	 OUTR	   
    Paul Janish	 89	.270	0.71910	  
    Jeff Keppinger	502	.310	0.68924
    Ramon Hernandez	507	.308	0.68047	  
    Jay Bruce	452	.314	0.67478	  
    B Phillips	609	.312	0.66831	  
    E Encarnacion	582	.340	0.64605	  
    Jerry Hairston	297	.384	0.62626	 
    Joey Votto	589	.368	0.62309	  
    Ryan Hanigan	 98	.367	0.60204	  
    C  Dickerson	122	.413	0.59016	  
    
    Willy Taveras	538	.308	0.67658
    Jermaine Dye	645	.344	0.64496	
    Pat Burrell	645	.367	0.62946	
    Yunel Escobar	587	.366	0.61840
    Jeff Francoeur	653	.294	0.69066
    The 2008 OBP and Out Rates of the players likely to be Reds next year and some of the names that have bandied about so-far this offseason.

    Not looking so promising. Low OBP's and high Out Rates abound with the players likely to get extended playing time. Of the 5 guys who's OBP/OutRates were acceptable, only 2 are likely to repeat their performance (Votto and EE).

    I foresee another season of hacking away at the plate unless some really, really different players are brought in for LF, CF and SS. A new organizational emphasis on patience and working the count wouldn't hurt either.
    based on what......
    "Is there a problem officers?"

  8. #7
    Member Ron Madden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,815

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by red-in-la View Post
    based on what......
    Over their careers both Votto and EE have shown a fair amount of patience at the plate.

  9. #8
    2009: Fail Ltlabner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    7,441

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by red-in-la View Post
    based on what......
    The other 3 guys are named Harriston, Hannigan and Dickerson.

    To believe that they will duplicate their numbers you have to believe:

    1) Harriston is resigned and repeats what is essentially a career year. And stays healthy long enough to do it.

    2) Hannigan and Dickerson repeat their OBP performance over an entire year, instead of a small sample. Dickerson isn't going to duplicate that performance over an entire year and it would be foolish to plan around him doing so. Hannigan? I don't know his minor league history but this is a catcher that broke into the league at age 27. Nice player but I don't see him sustaining a .367 OBP over a full year. There's usually a reason why players who break into the bigs later in life spent all that time in the minor leagues.

    3) Votto and EE have traditionally shown good patience at the plate they are likely to continue their histories. Votto showed good patience despite being a rookie under a regime focused on swinging early and swinging often.

    It's not a risk to think #3 will happen again. It's a big stretch to think #1 and #2 will happen again.
    a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude.

    I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate

  10. #9
    2009: Fail Ltlabner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    7,441

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
    Granted I now have a better understanding of what it takes to score runs and I would rather have guys who are willing to be more disciplined. But there have been teams who haven't been great walking teams and have done just fine.
    It's not all about walking. It's about getting on base. If they suddenly have some guy's who consistently hit .300 (and has a real, live history of doing so over several years) so their OBP is BA driven, I'm fine with that. High contract rates can drive OBP too.

    My bigger point was that the past few teams have been real free-swinging types. That can work in the right situations. I don't see 2009 shaping up to be the "right situation".
    Last edited by Ltlabner; 12-21-2008 at 04:22 PM.
    a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude.

    I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate

  11. #10
    BobC, get a legit F.O.! Mario-Rijo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Springfield, Ohio
    Posts
    9,052

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ltlabner View Post
    It's not all about walking. It's about getting on base. If they suddenly have some guy's who consistently hit .300 (and has a real, live history of doing so over several years) so their OBP is BA driven, I'm fine with that. High contract rates can drive OBP too.

    My bigger point was that the past few teams have been real free-swinging types. That can work in the right situations. I don't see 2009 shaping up to be the "right situation".
    Fair point but as I pointed out with that Reds team only 1 full time starter with an OBP over .350 and only 2 platooners.
    "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

    --Woody Hayes

  12. #11
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Midland, MI
    Posts
    6,410

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
    Fair point but as I pointed out with that Reds team only 1 full time starter with an OBP over .350 and only 2 platooners.
    The 1990 Cincinnati Reds team OBP was .322. The 1990 NL OBP was .321. So, they were above-average at getting on base. You were correct with your assumtion that the team didn't have many guys who walked--the team BA was .265 and the NL BA was .256. You can conclude that the reason for the lack of players with an OBP of .350 can be attributed to the fact that it was a different era--the 2008 NL OBP was .331. The other interesting thing to note is that not only were they slightly above-average in the OBP category, but they were also slightly above-average in R/G at 4.28 conpared to the 1990 NL R/G of 4.20...
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  13. #12
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by red-in-la View Post
    based on what......
    ... based on the fact that Janish doesn't have a MLB level bat, Keppinger and Ramon Hernandez are who they are, Bruce has the potential to improve but needs to make that a reality, Phillips is an out-making machine (imagine all the outs he'd make if he batted 1st or 2nd, although that would help lower his GIDPs), and Hairston pretty much had a career year last year.

    So, I think based on all that, it's pretty easy to say that EE and Votto are the only two that won't continue to make truckloads of outs.

  14. #13
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,227

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
    Granted I now have a better understanding of what it takes to score runs and I would rather have guys who are willing to be more disciplined. But there have been teams who haven't been great walking teams and have done just fine. Take the '90 Reds for example sure they were maybe a slightly better walking group as a unit but man for man none of them were out there attempting to work walks. Granted they were propped up by stellar defense, speed and lights out pitching, but they just didn't contend, they won a w/s and never fell out of 1st place. They had 4 guys who hit into double digit, double plays even. Heck they didn't even slug all that well, not one guy over .500 slugging. They had 1 starter over a .350 OBP and 2 platoon guys.

    BA/OBP
    Larkin - .301/.358
    Morris - .340/.381 (336 PA's)
    Braggs - .299/.385 (362 PA's)
    The 1990 Reds are an inside straight WS winner, a solid team they were, but not a great team and they were pretty drab offensively, the current Reds need offense more to win in today's game and their defense and pitching isn't as good as the 90 teams.

    The 1990 Reds were a bad team to get a BB, and a bad team to hit high above the league average and they were a bad team at slugging above the league average. It's quite possible if the season was longer they would have faded.

    Code:
    NATIONAL LEAGUE
    SEASON
    1990
    AVERAGE vs. the league average displayed only--not a sorting criteria
    OBA vs. the league average displayed only--not a sorting criteria
    SLG vs. the league average displayed only--not a sorting criteria
    RUNS vs. the league average displayed only--not a sorting criteria
    
    WALKS                           DIFF   PLAYER   LEAGUE     AVG      OBA      SLG       R     
    1    Pirates                      40      582      542    -.005     .000     .008       24   
    2    Phillies                     33      582      549    -.010    -.004    -.034      -72   
    3    Expos                        22      576      554    -.014    -.009    -.027      -63   
    4    Astros                       -2      548      550    -.022    -.018    -.052     -147   
    5    Mets                         -7      536      543    -.008    -.008     .011       65   
    6    Dodgers                      -8      538      546    -.003    -.002    -.015       14   
    7    Cardinals                   -31      517      548    -.008    -.011    -.039     -117   
    8    Padres                      -46      509      555    -.007    -.010    -.017      -54   
    9    Giants                      -61      488      549    -.003    -.008    -.001        1   
    10   Braves                      -74      473      547    -.014    -.020    -.001      -34   
    11   Reds                        -80      466      546     .001    -.006     .002      -21   
    12   Cubs                       -144      406      550    -.001    -.017    -.005      -30

  15. #14
    BobC, get a legit F.O.! Mario-Rijo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Springfield, Ohio
    Posts
    9,052

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    The 1990 Reds are an inside straight WS winner, a solid team they were, but not a great team and they were pretty drab offensively, the current Reds need offense more to win in today's game and their defense and pitching isn't as good as the 90 teams.

    The 1990 Reds were a bad team to get a BB, and a bad team to hit high above the league average and they were a bad team at slugging above the league average. It's quite possible if the season was longer they would have faded.

    Code:
    NATIONAL LEAGUE
    SEASON
    1990
    AVERAGE vs. the league average displayed only--not a sorting criteria
    OBA vs. the league average displayed only--not a sorting criteria
    SLG vs. the league average displayed only--not a sorting criteria
    RUNS vs. the league average displayed only--not a sorting criteria
    
    WALKS                           DIFF   PLAYER   LEAGUE     AVG      OBA      SLG       R     
    1    Pirates                      40      582      542    -.005     .000     .008       24   
    2    Phillies                     33      582      549    -.010    -.004    -.034      -72   
    3    Expos                        22      576      554    -.014    -.009    -.027      -63   
    4    Astros                       -2      548      550    -.022    -.018    -.052     -147   
    5    Mets                         -7      536      543    -.008    -.008     .011       65   
    6    Dodgers                      -8      538      546    -.003    -.002    -.015       14   
    7    Cardinals                   -31      517      548    -.008    -.011    -.039     -117   
    8    Padres                      -46      509      555    -.007    -.010    -.017      -54   
    9    Giants                      -61      488      549    -.003    -.008    -.001        1   
    10   Braves                      -74      473      547    -.014    -.020    -.001      -34   
    11   Reds                        -80      466      546     .001    -.006     .002      -21   
    12   Cubs                       -144      406      550    -.001    -.017    -.005      -30
    So would it be fair to say that they were carried by pitching, defense and just timely hitting? I mean the main thing for me was they weren't great offensively yet managed to stay in 1st place every day of the season. I just wonder if that helps to prove the theory of getting your pitching and defense in order and your offense doesn't have to be great. Not that I necc. expect the '09 Reds to be in that argument.
    Last edited by Mario-Rijo; 12-21-2008 at 07:54 PM.
    "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

    --Woody Hayes

  16. #15
    Stat Wanker Hodiernus RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    15,898

    Re: Hack-O-Matics in 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
    So would it be fair to say that they were carried by pitching, defense and just timely hitting? I mean the main thing for me was they weren't great offensively yet managed to stay in 1st place every day of the season. I just wonder if that helps to prove the theory of getting your pitching and defense in order and your offense doesn't have to be great. Not that I necc. expect the '09 Reds to be in that argument.
    If you consider hitting, pitching, and defense the three pillars of a team, you can win while being mediocre at one of them and being "timely" in its execution.

    It still comes down to outscoring your opponents about 60% of the time, however you want to get there. No one specific combination of walking the fine line is better than another. For every 1990 Reds there's a 2008 Phillies.

    My problem with the Reds of recent vintage is that we've squared away one aspect of the team but other parts have been poor with an outside shot at mediocrity. The Reds are still a good deal of luck or talent from being an average offense and aren't stellar pitching wise or defensively.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25