Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 63

Thread: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Smooth WMR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky
    Posts
    16,960

    Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    * 5x All-Star selection (1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1981)
    * 2x World Series champion (1975, 1976)
    * Silver Slugger Award winner (1981)
    * 1977 NL MVP
    * 1976 MLB All-Star Game MVP

  2. #2
    A Pleasure to Burn Joseph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Avenue
    Posts
    8,613

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    If George had been a Yankee he'd be in and we'd be talking about how he's only in because he's a Yankee.

    Were there a Hall of Really Good, George would be in.

    I don't think he's a HoFer though.

    Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
    Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
    Chicago Blackhawks - 10, 13, 15
    University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
    Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98


    “Everything that happens before Death is what counts.”
    ― Ray Bradbury, Something Wicked This Way Comes

  3. #3
    Smooth WMR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky
    Posts
    16,960

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    Quote Originally Posted by Joseph View Post
    If George had been a Yankee he'd be in and we'd be talking about how he's only in because he's a Yankee.

    Were there a Hall of Really Good, George would be in.

    I don't think he's a HoFer though.
    What about George Foster vs. Don Mattingly vs. Jim Rice?

    (I personally feel that GF belongs in the HoF. His two WS rings puts him over the top, IMHO)

  4. #4
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,143

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    No

  5. #5
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    No
    What he said.

  6. #6
    Baseball card addict MrCinatit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Piqua
    Posts
    4,427

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    Take away four years, and he is nowhere near. As much as I like the guy, four years does not make a Hall of Fame career.

  7. #7
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West and WNC
    Posts
    5,558

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    Quote Originally Posted by MrCinatit View Post
    Take away four years, and he is nowhere near. As much as I like the guy, four years does not make a Hall of Fame career.
    4 years (1963-1966) did it for Sandy Koufax. But man, were they great years.

    I don't think Foster belongs in the HoF, as much as I like him. Reds HoF, for a fine career, suits him just fine.
    sorry we're boring

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,317

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    Quote Originally Posted by Always Red View Post
    4 years (1963-1966) did it for Sandy Koufax. But man, were they great years.
    I like to think that Koufax had a 6 year run, though those 4 years were better than the other two,

    But in 1961, Koufax won 18 games, led the NL with 269 K's, and was 7th in ERA.

    In 1962, Koufax's injuries limited him to only 14 wins, but he did lead the NL in ERA.

  9. #9
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West and WNC
    Posts
    5,558

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    I like to think that Koufax had a 6 year run, though those 4 years were better than the other two,

    But in 1961, Koufax won 18 games, led the NL with 269 K's, and was 7th in ERA.

    In 1962, Koufax's injuries limited him to only 14 wins, but he did lead the NL in ERA.
    2 good years followed by 4 of the best years in pitching history.
    sorry we're boring

  10. #10
    Baseball card addict MrCinatit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Piqua
    Posts
    4,427

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    Quote Originally Posted by Always Red View Post
    4 years (1963-1966) did it for Sandy Koufax. But man, were they great years.

    I don't think Foster belongs in the HoF, as much as I like him. Reds HoF, for a fine career, suits him just fine.
    Somewhat true.
    The only reason Koufax's run did not extend further is that he retired young (30) due to injury. Basically, he was also voted in because of what could have happened, such as Addie Joss (imagine the number he could have put up...).
    Foster, on the other hand, continued his career for quite a while after his monster run - much of it being injury free, I believe, though the '81 strike did rob him of potentially another large year.
    Foster's number decline came mostly due to age (his numbers drop off significantly after 33), and arguably a departure from Cincinnati and appearance with the Mets.
    Baseball reference compares his stats to Gil Hodges, Willy Horton, Tino Martinez, Jack Clark and Del Ennis. Five very good players, but none are quite HOF caliber.

  11. #11
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West and WNC
    Posts
    5,558

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    Quote Originally Posted by MrCinatit View Post
    Somewhat true.
    The only reason Koufax's run did not extend further is that he retired young (30) due to injury. Basically, he was also voted in because of what could have happened, such as Addie Joss (imagine the number he could have put up...).
    Foster, on the other hand, continued his career for quite a while after his monster run - much of it being injury free, I believe, though the '81 strike did rob him of potentially another large year.
    Foster's number decline came mostly due to age (his numbers drop off significantly after 33), and arguably a departure from Cincinnati and appearance with the Mets.
    Baseball reference compares his stats to Gil Hodges, Willy Horton, Tino Martinez, Jack Clark and Del Ennis. Five very good players, but none are quite HOF caliber.
    I was just pointing out that on a rare occasion, 4 great years in a row can lead one to a HoF.

    I was never intending to compare Foster and Koufax's careers; obviously George had a lot more time (ultimately, to cool off) than Sandy K did.
    sorry we're boring

  12. #12
    Beer is good!! George Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    5,964

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    The highest vote total Foster received for HOF induction was 6.9% , a far cry from the needed 75%.

    http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/pl...layerId=114333
    "Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard

  13. #13
    Smooth WMR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky
    Posts
    16,960

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    In 1977, Foster hit 52 home runs, making him the only major league player to belt 50 or more homers in a single season during a 25-year period (between Willie Mays with 52 in 1965 and Cecil Fielder with 51 in 1990). The next batters to hit 50 HRs in the National League were Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa in 1998. He also batted in an NL leading 149 runs. In recognition of his accomplishment, Foster received the NL's MVP award by a unanimous vote.

    You may be right, MrC, but the above passage screams HoF to me. Again, JMO.

  14. #14
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West and WNC
    Posts
    5,558

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    Quote Originally Posted by WilyMoROCKS View Post

    You may be right, MrC, but the above passage screams HoF to me. Again, JMO.
    Using that reasoning, Roger Maris should be in the HoF, too.
    sorry we're boring

  15. #15
    Big Red Machine RedsBaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Out Wayne
    Posts
    24,137

    Re: Is George Foster worthy of the Hall of Fame?

    Quote Originally Posted by Always Red View Post
    Using that reasoning, Roger Maris should be in the HoF, too.
    Very true. I've often thought of Foster when I have heard/read others advocate the HOF selection of Maris. I wouldn't vote for either Maris or Foster as a Hall of Famer, but George's career stacks up well with that of Maris.
    "Hey...Dad. Wanna Have A Catch?" Kevin Costner in "Field Of Dreams."


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator