Turn Off Ads?
Page 57 of 68 FirstFirst ... 74753545556575859606167 ... LastLast
Results 841 to 855 of 1015

Thread: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

  1. #841
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,282

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    Willy Taveras is on the other hand using the exact same approach/skill/talent as a 23 year old version of himself.

    Not necessarily. Tavaras had success in 2007. The Reds are supposedly working with him to get back to that approach. They said he changed his approach in 2008.

    Dickerson did have a nice season last year. However, 100 AB at the end of the season is completely different than starting every day after teams have a scouting report on you, as Stynes and Nunally found out.

    I just wonder how Tavaras 2007 season can be written off as "luck" by some, yet Dickerson's 400 AB in 2008 signals a huge step forward? IMO, we're not really sure what we're going to get from either player, that's why it's wise to have some depth, in case one of the guys completely falls apart.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #842
    Knowledge Is Good Big Klu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Cambridge, OH
    Posts
    30,661

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
    Are you going to call Jay Bruce a bust if he doesn't have a huge season before age 27?
    There are a lot of people out there who would, because Reds fans were promised that he would be an absolute monster right out of the gate, and we haven't seen that yet. I have a feeling that the fans aren't going to be patient with him. I think he will need to have that monster season no later than 2010--otherwise, he will be labeled a bust.
    Eric Stratton, Rush Chairman. Damn glad to meet ya.

  4. #843
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,282

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by Ltlabner View Post
    Code:
    NAME	        YEAR   PA   OBP  SLG  OUTR    SB%   VORP   EqA	 RAR   RAP
    Willy Taveras	2008  538  .308	.296 .67658  90.7%   2.0  .238	 4.2   -19.2
    Willy Taveras	2007  408  .367	.382 .62745  78.6%  16.4  .261	12.5	-1.8
    Willy Taveras	2006  587  .333	.338 .66099  78.6%   5.1  .242   6.9   -12.4
    Willy Taveras	2005  635  .325	.341 .65984  75.6%   4.9  .242   7.3   -15.7
    In 2005/2006 he made outs 65% or more of the time, stole bases at a barely acceptable rate, had hugely sub-par EqA, barely scored more runs than a replacement level player and scored significantly less runs than an average CF.



    I fail to see how that is "respectable" let alone "helpful".
    A .325 OBP at age 22 is respectable. Likewise .333 at age 23 is respectable, when you take into account that he plays a good CF (IMO) and is one of the best base stealers in the league.

    Jay Bruce's VORP last season was only 4.8, which was WORSE than Wily's first two years. Does Bruce suck too? Should we cut him? Of course not, we will give Bruce some slack because he was playing in the major leagues at a very young age. But for some reason, people won't give Tavaras the same benefit of the doubt.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  5. #844
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,282

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    I think the possibility that Dickerson sucks more than Taveras next year is less than 20%. Dickerson just has a much stronger skillset, one that is better suited to succeed at the things that matter in scoring runs.
    But what about vs Hopper? Don't you think Tavaras is better than Hopper?

    Hopefully Walt gets some better OF in and pushes both Dickerson and Tavaras to the bench, but right now, this is a solid depth move.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  6. #845
    I rig polls REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    29,282

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    Which comes back to the original issue.... why the heck was Walt going after a center fielder? There was not a need for one. He had one and a backup between Dickerson and Hopper. He needed and still needs a corner outfielder.
    A cheap backup to Dickerson, which is smart, IMO.

    This signing doesn't stop Walt from adding the corner OF you desire him too.
    [Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  7. #846
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
    Not necessarily. Tavaras had success in 2007. The Reds are supposedly working with him to get back to that approach. They said he changed his approach in 2008.

    Dickerson did have a nice season last year. However, 100 AB at the end of the season is completely different than starting every day after teams have a scouting report on you, as Stynes and Nunally found out.

    I just wonder how Tavaras 2007 season can be written off as "luck" by some, yet Dickerson's 400 AB in 2008 signals a huge step forward? IMO, we're not really sure what we're going to get from either player, that's why it's wise to have some depth, in case one of the guys completely falls apart.
    Taveras 2007 was luck because he didn't walk more and he didn't hit for more power, he just had 14 more hits fall in as a result of his normal .330 BABIP turning into a .370 BABIP. Thats it.

    Dickerson was in the FSL in 2005 and despite going up a level and in a power reducing invironment saw his IsoP jump from .097 to .147. He then went ahead and got into AA, where his time there in 2006/2007 saw his IsoP go to .159. Then his time in AAA from 2007 to 2008 he saw his IsoP go to .184.

    So while Taveras saw his numbers increase because of luck, Dickerson was showing a change in his skill set. Its not just 2008. It was his data from 2005-2008 and seeing his power increase at each step of the way while maintaining his ability to still draw lots of walks.

    One guy showed no change. One guy showed lots.

  8. #847
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
    But what about vs Hopper? Don't you think Tavaras is better than Hopper?

    Hopefully Walt gets some better OF in and pushes both Dickerson and Tavaras to the bench, but right now, this is a solid depth move.
    The only difference between Hopper and Taveras is that Hopper strikes out significantly less and hasn't played as long in the majors. I think they are worth about the same. Fringe 5th outfield types good for pinch running and sacrifice bunting.

    And you can hope all you want about Walt getting better outfielders, but he isn't going to bring in anyone thats going to play CF. He has said that Bruce and Taveras make up 2/3 of the outfield. Taveras is his starter. He isn't bringing someone in to compete with him or to overtake him there.

  9. #848
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
    A cheap backup to Dickerson, which is smart, IMO.

    This signing doesn't stop Walt from adding the corner OF you desire him too.
    No, it doesn't. It does stop him from playing the better option for CF though, which is Chris Dickerson.

  10. #849
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,928

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    No, it doesn't. It does stop him from playing the better option for CF though, which is Chris Dickerson.
    And pushes Dickerson to LF which is a waste of his defensive skills and weakens the position offensively. Dickerson isn't in Dunn's class at the plate, and ideally he should never have to be compared to him. Dickerson's ceiling might be Mike Cameron. Power, defense and decent OB skills. And he can steal a base or two. He SHOULD be the starting CF. But the OF red herring is in full force.

    SS Keppinger. ugh.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  11. #850
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    And pushes Dickerson to LF which is a waste of his defensive skills and weakens the position offensively. Dickerson isn't in Dunn's class at the plate, and ideally he should never have to be compared to him. Dickerson's ceiling might be Mike Cameron. Power, defense and decent OB skills. And he can steal a base or two. He SHOULD be the starting CF. But the OF red herring is in full force.

    SS Keppinger. ugh.
    I still don't see Dickerson being a left fielder. If the Reds bring in Hairston I fully see him being the left fielder next year (vomit). If they don't, I see them going in a direction that isn't Chris Dickerson. I think all the WT thing does is push Dickerson to the bench and leave open LF still, which is the only spot we needed to address in the first place.

  12. #851
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,928

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    I still don't see Dickerson being a left fielder. If the Reds bring in Hairston I fully see him being the left fielder next year (vomit). If they don't, I see them going in a direction that isn't Chris Dickerson. I think all the WT thing does is push Dickerson to the bench and leave open LF still, which is the only spot we needed to address in the first place.
    SS. SS NEEDS to be addressed. badly. beyond badly.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  13. #852
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    SS. SS NEEDS to be addressed. badly. beyond badly.
    I was referring to the OF. You are correct though.

  14. #853
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,928

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    The OF needed to be addressed. Well, LF and a true 4th OF was needed. But there is a glut of corner OF's both on the market and available via trade. Plus there is one or two potential candidates in house for LF (Dorn, Henry Frazier/EE). The OF could have waited.

    Instead the 2008 Reds will feature some combination of Keppinger - no range, AGon - no health, and Janish - no bat. wheee!

    Walt's complete failure thus far to land a stud SS is alarming to me.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  15. #854
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by edabbs44 View Post
    Taveras would contribute to the woes but I am sure that he would only be part of the equation.



    What happened last season? Not blaming Dunn, but their pitching wasn't a huge issue last year.



    If it is the "big" one, then that would mean that there isn't enough out there to make them a contender without hurting the future of the franchise. Loading up on overpriced vets for the sake of optics is as dumb as it gets.

    If Taveras gets more than 600 PA, he'll be a huge part of the crappy equation.

    Pitchers not named Volquez, Arroyo, Cueto, Cordero, Burton and Affeldt sucked last year. That means roughly 1/2 the staff sucked.

    I'm not saying load up on "overpriced vets", but if those "overpriced vets" are better than what we have in-house, which looks to be the case, then start loading up.

  16. #855
    Administrator Boss-Hog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    6,469

    Re: Reds sign Willy Taveras to 2 year deal....

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF
    Walt's complete failure thus far to land a stud SS is alarming to me.
    I agree with you that we need to address SS, but you say that like stud SS's grow on trees.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator