Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Bengals 2009 Schedule "Should" Be Easier

  1. #1
    Just The Big Picture macro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    The Bluegrass State
    Posts
    6,150

    Bengals 2009 Schedule "Should" Be Easier

    HOME:

    Baltimore (11-5)
    Cleveland (4-12)
    Pittsburgh (12-4)
    Denver (8-7) *
    Kansas City (2-14)
    Chicago (9-7)
    Detroit (0-16)
    Houston (8-8)
    AWAY:

    Baltimore (11-5)
    Cleveland (4-12)
    Pittsburgh (12-4)
    Oakland (5-11)
    San Diego (7-8) *
    Green Bay (6-10)
    Minnesota (10-6)
    New York Jets (9-7)
    * Pending outcome of tonight's game

    If San Diego beats Denver tonight, the Bengals will end up with only three non-divisional games (out of ten) against teams that had winning records this season. Only two of next year's non-divisional opponents will have made the playoffs this season.

    By contrast, according to CBS today, the Bengals had the toughest schedule in the NFL this season.

    [SARCASM]Could they have a shot at another magical 8-8 season in 2009?[/SARCASM]
    Last edited by macro; 12-28-2008 at 07:39 PM.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    A Little to the Left Redsfaithful's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bexley, OH
    Posts
    7,464

    Re: Bengals 2009 Schedule "Should" Be Easier

    Note this is the same lineup they had in 2005 basically, the NFC North and AFC West.

    If they hire a GM I might let myself get fooled into getting excited again, but that's a big if. So easy to get sucked in with the past few games, but you just have to remember who the competition was.
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
    --Oscar Wilde

  4. #3
    Administrator Boss-Hog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    6,074

    Re: Bengals 2009 Schedule "Should" Be Easier

    Quote Originally Posted by macro View Post
    HOME:

    Baltimore (11-5)
    Cleveland (4-12)
    Pittsburgh (12-4)
    Denver (8-7) *
    Kansas City (2-14)
    Chicago (9-7)
    Detroit (0-16)
    Houston (8-8)
    AWAY:

    Baltimore (11-5)
    Cleveland (4-12)
    Pittsburgh (12-4)
    Oakland (5-11)
    San Diego (7-8) *
    Green Bay (6-10)
    Minnesota (10-6)
    New York Jets (9-7)
    * Pending outcome of tonight's game

    If San Diego beats Denver tonight, the Bengals will end up with only three non-divisional games (out of ten) against teams that had winning records this season. Only two of next year's non-divisional opponents will have made the playoffs this season.

    By contrast, according to CBS today, the Bengals had the toughest schedule in the NFL this season.

    [SARCASM]Could they have a shot at another magical 8-8 season in 2009?[/SARCASM]
    If I understand things correctly, we're locked into having the Broncos at home and the Chargers on the road based on the locale of the last game with both teams. I certainly can be wrong, but Bengals.com is reporting this, as well.

  5. #4
    Baseball card addict MrCinatit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Piqua
    Posts
    4,429

    Re: Bengals 2009 Schedule "Should" Be Easier

    That second to the last home game should be a Monday Night Football game. A national holiday, in fact.

  6. #5
    15 game winner Danny Serafini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sultanes de Monterrey
    Posts
    4,183

    Re: Bengals 2009 Schedule "Should" Be Easier

    Quote Originally Posted by Redsfaithful View Post
    Note this is the same lineup they had in 2005 basically, the NFC North and AFC West.

    If they hire a GM I might let myself get fooled into getting excited again, but that's a big if. So easy to get sucked in with the past few games, but you just have to remember who the competition was.
    The Bengals had the AFC South in 2005.

  7. #6
    Just The Big Picture macro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    The Bluegrass State
    Posts
    6,150

    Re: Bengals 2009 Schedule "Should" Be Easier

    Quote Originally Posted by Boss-Hog View Post
    If I understand things correctly, we're locked into having the Broncos at home and the Chargers on the road based on the locale of the last game with both teams. I certainly can be wrong, but Bengals.com is reporting this, as well.
    Yep, they set the schedule (except for the two games that are based on standings) for all teams for 2002-2009 back in 2002. (I may be off on the starting year, but I do know that next year is the last year that was pre-scheduled. Not sure what their plans are beyond '09.) Since the Bengals went to Denver last time they met in the regular season (remember the Brad St. Louis bad snap?), the next one will be here. Chargers came here last (remember the second half collapse?), so Bengals go there next year.

    The Bengals had the AFC South in 2005.
    That's right. Teams have three other divisions in their conference to rotate through, but four divisions in the other conference to rotate through.

    I really like the scheduling formula they have used for the past several seasons and hope they continue to use it beyond 2009. I really hope they don't entertain the idea of expansion. The beauty of the NFL and it's current scheduling format is the symmetry, a far cry from the mess that is Major League Baseball.

  8. #7
    A Little to the Left Redsfaithful's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bexley, OH
    Posts
    7,464

    Re: Bengals 2009 Schedule "Should" Be Easier

    Quote Originally Posted by Danny Serafini View Post
    The Bengals had the AFC South in 2005.
    Yep, that's right, my mistake.
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
    --Oscar Wilde


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25