Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Sleepers

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    High five!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    6,976

    Sleepers

    Here's a discussion of 2009 sleepers albeit with a bit of a fantasy bent. The comments have some interesting names including Joey Votto.

    Today we pose a question to the readers: who is your #1 sleeper for 2009? Hopefully your league-mates aren't reading. Sleeper is defined in the loose sense - just a guy who is greatly undervalued, in your opinion. For example, we all knew who Tim Lincecum was heading into '08 but he was still a great sleeper pick.

    I'll kick it off with my own #1 sleeper: Nelson Cruz of the Rangers. Cruz had a ridiculous 2008. He hit .342/.429/.695 in 103 Triple A games, nailing 37 HR and swiping 24 bags. He did just as well in 115 ABs for the big club - .330/.421/.609 with 7 HR and 3 SBs.

    Cruz has the potential to jack 30 HR for the Rangers in 2009. He attempted a steal 25% of the time he was on first base in the minors, so the potential for double digit swipes looks strong too. He'll join current Texas mashers Chris Davis and Josh Hamilton.

    Cruz has his flaws - he's 28, and he'd spent plenty of time in Triple A prior to '08. And he didn't do anything with the 437 ABs the Rangers gave him prior to 2008. He also used to strike out quite a bit. But the guy's being drafted in the 16th round - he's a risk worth taking.

    Let's open up the floor to the readers. Who is your #1 sleeper (you only get one) for 2009, and why?
    Who are your sleepers? Do you think the Reds could and/or should go out and get one of them?

  2. #2
    Member camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    12,405

    Re: Sleepers

    Nick Swisher and Austin Kearns would be on my list. I could see Arroyo having a year similar to his 2006 numbers. Whether he ends up as a pitcher or outfielder, I think Micah Owings could be a huge sleeper. John Maine might blossom into an ace, but I guess he's not really a sleeper. Nick Markakis isn't exactly a sleeper either, but I think he could go from 'really good' to 'superstar'. J.R. Towles was a big flop for the Astros, but he could come back in a major way. A lot of people are already writing off Randy Johnson because of his age, but going to San Francisco could help his numbers quite a bit. Max Scherzer could be another ace in the making.

    Anyway, I guess my #1 sleeper would be J.R. Towles. He might enter himself into the Russell Martin/Brian McCann group. #2 would be Scherzer just because he's so freaking good already.

  3. #3
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    31,935

    Re: Sleepers

    Ryan Spilborgs. Guy will rake in Colorado. The Reds got the guy he replaced instead. I don't think the Rockies would deal him.

    Funny, a couple years ago Jayson Werth was a guy that a few posters named and the Reds got the guy he replaced (Jeff Conine) as well.

    In house, Chris Dickerson will be a surprise if he gets the playing time, but not to this board. Of course, that guy that Spilborgs replaced may prevent it from happening.

    On the pitching side, Nick Masset will be this year's Jared Burton. Non-Reds, Brandon Morrow will step forward.
    Last edited by mth123; 01-02-2009 at 03:10 PM.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,308

    Re: Sleepers

    If anyone thinks that Joey Votto is a sleeper, they must have slept through the 2008 season.

    He posted an .874 OPS last year, .958 after the all star game, and about 1.050 in the last two months. he hit lefties as well as righties.

  5. #5
    Member SteelSD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    In Your Head
    Posts
    10,764

    Re: Sleepers

    Micah Owings. Yeah, if he's healthy, I'm going with Micah Owings. The guy has solid minor league peripherals. His K/9 rate (7.9) is a bit lower than I'd like, but his HR/9 rate is very good (0.50) and his BB rate is just fine (2.8). His HR rates haven't translated to this point, but should go down after he gains a bit more experience.

    His 2008 was a tale of two seasons. His first 2008 season ended on June 1st. To that point, he'd produced an ERA of 4.17 despite a bad start on May 30th (6 ER in 6.1 IP) that pushed his ERA up from 3.73. After June 1st, his ERA was an abysmal 9.36, leaving him at 5.93 for the year. So was that injury or just a statistical return to the norm? Well, that depends on what we're looking at.

    Owings' FIP was 4.80 for each of his first two MLB seasons on the mound. His xFIP numbers were 4.94 and 5.06 respectively. That looks like teh suck at first glance. Yet, Owings increased his K/9 rate from 6.2 in 2007 to 7.5 in 2008. A fly-ball pitcher can survive there. Owings' Defensive Efficiency rating in 2007 was .727 and .712 in 2008. Those DER numbers were higher then the overall D'backs DER in both those seasons (.693 in 2007 and .686 in 2008). But hold on. The variance is pretty close for both seasons and we know that Fly Ball pitchers, while they may be more prone to HR overall, may also benefit from higher DER numbers due to the fact that more fly balls are caught versus ground balls. His Infield Fly rates would have placed him among the top 12 NL pitchers for both seasons. And even tossing baseballs in a hitter's park, his HR per Fly Ball rates have been right about NL average (@11%). His LOB rate for 2007 was nothing exceptional (70.9%), but his 61.1% from 2008 goes a long way to explaining the major ERA jump.

    I'd suggest that xFIP may be doing Owings an injustice. I'd suggest that a guy like Matt Cain receives the same kind of negative xFIP treatment.

    While I often take both James and Marcel projections with a big block of salt, they're projecting his 2009 FIP (not xFIP) ERA to be 4.39 and 4.48 respectively while also projecting his ERA to be 4.52 and 4.54. I can get behind that because they're so close (even the peripherals), and neither seem to be over-projecting. It's a league average pitcher with a decent amount of upside as he continues to learn.

    And here's something that isn't often considered...

    Based on Owings' offensive performance three-year splits, he's may be worth nearly 12 Runs per 60 PA (not 600) versus your average NL pitcher. To put that into perspective, if Owings produced a 4.50 ERA versus a pitcher who produced the same ERA, it would be as if Owings were producing a 3.90 ERA instead.

    At an ERA of 5.00, Owings' performance would replicate an ERA of 4.40 over 180 Innings because of his bat.
    "The problem with strikeouts isn't that they hurt your team, it's that they hurt your feelings..." --Rob Neyer

    "The single most important thing for a hitter is to get a good pitch to hit. A good hitter can hit a pitch that’s over the plate three times better than a great hitter with a ball in a tough spot.”
    --Ted Williams

  6. #6
    Member Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,544

    Re: Sleepers

    Quote Originally Posted by SteelSD View Post
    Based on Owings' offensive performance three-year splits, he's may be worth nearly 12 Runs per 60 PA (not 600) versus your average NL pitcher. To put that into perspective, if Owings produced a 4.50 ERA versus a pitcher who produced the same ERA, it would be as if Owings were producing a 3.90 ERA instead.

    At an ERA of 5.00, Owings' performance would replicate an ERA of 4.40 over 180 Innings because of his bat.
    fascinating. makes his value as a starter much higher than his value as a reliever.
    .

  7. #7
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    31,935

    Re: Sleepers

    Quote Originally Posted by SteelSD View Post
    Micah Owings. Yeah, if he's healthy, I'm going with Micah Owings. The guy has solid minor league peripherals. His K/9 rate (7.9) is a bit lower than I'd like, but his HR/9 rate is very good (0.50) and his BB rate is just fine (2.8). His HR rates haven't translated to this point, but should go down after he gains a bit more experience.

    His 2008 was a tale of two seasons. His first 2008 season ended on June 1st. To that point, he'd produced an ERA of 4.17 despite a bad start on May 30th (6 ER in 6.1 IP) that pushed his ERA up from 3.73. After June 1st, his ERA was an abysmal 9.36, leaving him at 5.93 for the year. So was that injury or just a statistical return to the norm? Well, that depends on what we're looking at.

    Owings' FIP was 4.80 for each of his first two MLB seasons on the mound. His xFIP numbers were 4.94 and 5.06 respectively. That looks like teh suck at first glance. Yet, Owings increased his K/9 rate from 6.2 in 2007 to 7.5 in 2008. A fly-ball pitcher can survive there. Owings' Defensive Efficiency rating in 2007 was .727 and .712 in 2008. Those DER numbers were higher then the overall D'backs DER in both those seasons (.693 in 2007 and .686 in 2008). But hold on. The variance is pretty close for both seasons and we know that Fly Ball pitchers, while they may be more prone to HR overall, may also benefit from higher DER numbers due to the fact that more fly balls are caught versus ground balls. His Infield Fly rates would have placed him among the top 12 NL pitchers for both seasons. And even tossing baseballs in a hitter's park, his HR per Fly Ball rates have been right about NL average (@11%). His LOB rate for 2007 was nothing exceptional (70.9%), but his 61.1% from 2008 goes a long way to explaining the major ERA jump.

    I'd suggest that xFIP may be doing Owings an injustice. I'd suggest that a guy like Matt Cain receives the same kind of negative xFIP treatment.

    While I often take both James and Marcel projections with a big block of salt, they're projecting his 2009 FIP (not xFIP) ERA to be 4.39 and 4.48 respectively while also projecting his ERA to be 4.52 and 4.54. I can get behind that because they're so close (even the peripherals), and neither seem to be over-projecting. It's a league average pitcher with a decent amount of upside as he continues to learn.

    And here's something that isn't often considered...

    Based on Owings' offensive performance three-year splits, he's may be worth nearly 12 Runs per 60 PA (not 600) versus your average NL pitcher. To put that into perspective, if Owings produced a 4.50 ERA versus a pitcher who produced the same ERA, it would be as if Owings were producing a 3.90 ERA instead.

    At an ERA of 5.00, Owings' performance would replicate an ERA of 4.40 over 180 Innings because of his bat.
    Steel,

    Your analysis has a pretty good track record and this post gives me more hope than anything that has happened all off-season. I've been pretty negative on Owings but your post got me looking more into his background and I'm feeling a little more optimistic about him. He supposedly has great "make-up" and fields his position quite well. You've covered his bat.

    I think Owings solidifying the 5th spot should faciltate a move of Daryl Thompson to middle relief (where I think he could be a plus guy) and that depth might give the team a glut of middle relievers to deal for other needs. The team should be shopping Weathers and considering Burton as trade bait for a building block at this point. As JoJo mentioned, I'd be asking Cordero what conditions he would require to waive his no trade clause.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!

  8. #8
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: Sleepers

    I'm gonna say it...

    Laynce Nix

  9. #9
    Member corkedbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    11,714

    Re: Sleepers

    Quote Originally Posted by Highlifeman21 View Post
    I'm gonna say it...

    Laynce Nix
    But I'm afraid he's blocked by the Taveras acquistion. Nice pick, but that's probably just too big of an obstacle for any mere OFer to overcome.
    Last edited by corkedbat; 01-02-2009 at 11:48 PM.

  10. #10
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: Sleepers

    Quote Originally Posted by corkedbat View Post
    But I'm afraid he's blocked by the Taveras acquistion. Nice pick, but that's probablyjust too big of an obstacle for any mere OFer to overcome.
    We still need someone to play LF...

    That someone could be Nix.

  11. #11
    Member corkedbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    11,714

    Re: Sleepers

    Quote Originally Posted by Highlifeman21 View Post
    We still need someone to play LF...

    That someone could be Nix.
    And dislodge Norris Hopper? Pshaw, I say!

  12. #12
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: Sleepers

    Quote Originally Posted by corkedbat View Post
    And dislodge Norris Hopper? Pshaw, I say!
    Is Hopper even healthy?

  13. #13
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,911

    Re: Sleepers

    Jesus Flores could have a breakout year. I really think the Nats have an interesting team. No real pitching, but an interesting offense.

    Morrow for the M's is a good pick. The Astros have a pitcher that is local to the Amarillo area named Chance Douglass. He could get a look this year and break into a weak rotation, or at the very least middle relief. Hard thrower drafted late but got 2nd round money.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  14. #14
    Member corkedbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    11,714

    Re: Sleepers

    Nelson Cruz would have been my choice too. I think Gabe Kapler might be another - in a platoon role with Dickerson or maybe later Dorn.

    I don't know if he'd be a "sleeper" since he's been mentioned so much, but I think Baldelli would go in the "hgh-risk/high reward" category.

  15. #15
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,911

    Re: Sleepers

    Chris Volstad from the Marlins might be in line for a big leap. Not a big K guy, but keeps the ball in the park.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator