Turn Off Ads?

View Poll Results: Clay or Phil?

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • Clay

    13 72.22%
  • Phil

    5 27.78%
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Hughes or Bucholz

  1. #1
    Member penantboundreds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    861

    Hughes or Bucholz

    Phillip v. Clay

    What do you think the realistic view of each of them is for the upcoming season? Who would you want?

    Starting this as a poll as well, just to see actual numbers relating.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Vampire Weekend @Bernie's camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    11,438

    Re: Hughes or Bucholz

    Long term, without a doubt, I'd rather have Hughes. For 2009, though, it's a tough call, but I'd still go with Hughes. However, it might not be until mid-season that he starts to put it all together.

  4. #3
    dixgomez
    Guest

    Re: Hughes or Bucholz

    I think i'm gonna go for Phil.... it makes me feel more realistic...

  5. #4
    Potential Lunch Winner Dom Heffner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    6,079

    Re: Hughes or Bucholz

    I look at Buchholz's K rate, and I'm not sure how he ended up with the lousy numbers he did.

    Personally, I think he is the better of the two.

  6. #5
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: Hughes or Bucholz

    Is Phil Hughes healthy yet?

  7. #6
    Member improbus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    2,082

    Re: Hughes or Bucholz

    Quote Originally Posted by Highlifeman21 View Post
    Is Phil Hughes healthy yet?
    That question is usually a red flag.
    Variatio delectat - Cicero

  8. #7
    Member blumj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Northern MA
    Posts
    4,633

    Re: Hughes or Bucholz

    Quote Originally Posted by dom heffner View Post
    i look at buchholz's k rate, and i'm not sure how he ended up with the lousy numbers he did.

    Personally, i think he is the better of the two.
    bb/9: 4.86, babip: .366, lob%: 60.5%
    "Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25