I think the combine is overrated as an evaluation tool. If your team drafts someone solely off their combine results, they are really setting themselves up. If I were a GM, I would have scouts checking their times and performance over multiple trials conducted weeks apart from each other to determine whether the combine results are a fluke. I also think the combine does little to show on-field decision making. GMs who salivate over combine times are kind of like Jim Bowden and his fascination with 5-toolers. Sure, they have the naturability to play, but they don't always have the smarts to put it together (Wonderlic scores notwithstanding).