I took Ryan The Riot and Joe Saunders.
NEXT!
I took Ryan The Riot and Joe Saunders.
NEXT!
Mark Reynolds off the board.
My whole team is sleepers...
Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.
I took Hanrahan. NEXT!
Ya know, after looking over Reynolds stats from last year, and the stats we are using in this league, getting him in the 16th round is a steal. the only place he MIGHT hurt me is BA. if you limit PA's to 450, he's a top 5 3B in every category except BA (21st) and RBI (7th)
I'm feeling pretty good about the pick, better if he can get his BA back to his 2007 season.
Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.
I've got Reynolds down for .244/78/26/92/8. PECOTA has him at .260/79/29/84/9. That is a big spread in BA. He's a slightly below-average player compared overall based on the PECOTA projection. But with my BA he's not worth much. Basically, it all depends on how comfortable you are with his BA; if he can keep it up around .260 he will be pretty good...
Fwiw, I feel I should make some type of statement regarding yesterday. I chalk up yesterday as a regrettable, BIG misunderstanding. (More than one actually) One of which I want to try to clear up.
At NO time was I suggesting that Atomic Dumpling did anything improper. Since it appears that Atomic Dumpling (and others) may have had that impression and that Atomic Dumpling felt insulted I offer my sincere apology to him for not wording my previous post better but it was NOT my intention to insult his character or integrity. Again, Imo, this is mostly a misunderstanding.
I hope that people can understand that at this time I feel it may be better for me to not comment anymore about what happened yesterday until at least some time has passed and it's not quite so "fresh". I also hope that this will not affect anything that happens this year. If it does I'll leave it up to the commish and the rest of the league to decide how to proceed.
By the way, judging from some of the posts, I'm afraid that a few people maybe making assumptions based on only a couple posts on an anonymous internet message board. As some of you may already know, it can be easier for misunderstandings to happen when you're dealing with the internet. And like I've said, Imo, yesterday was a regrettable, BIG misunderstanding. One that I would like to be left to Atomic Dumpling and myself to discuss sometime in the future.
He's entering his third year. 1st year he had an .843 OPS, 2nd year he regressed. If he posts an .830 OPS this year, I'll be plenty pleased to have him as my starting 3B.
I think he was waaay overlooked, especially given the stats we are using. in 4 of the 5 offensive categories he was a top 10 player finishing no lower than 7th. It all comes down to his BA, which I think will rebound to at least a .280 mark.
Last edited by TRF; 03-18-2009 at 06:00 PM.
Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.
Mark Reynolds also set the all time mark for strike outs(204) in one year in 2008(Dunner is now in third behind Reynolds and Ryan Howard). He walked 64 times. With that low of a contact rate, his batting average will not go up too much. He struck out 37.8% of the time in 2008. His BABIP was .329 last year, which is generally considered on the 'lucky' side. He is Adam Dunn lite....that is why I passed on him.
But you are right that everyone in the 16th round has warts, and his are no worse than others, and he is young with upside.
__________________
"I think we’re starting to get to the point where people are starting to get tired of this stretch of ball,” Votto said. “I think something needs to start changing and start going in a different direction. I’m going to do my part to help make that change.”
mbgrayson is now up, and then I think it's me again.
I took Rickie weeks with pick 16.9...talk about questionable batting average!
Back to camisadelgolf for 16.10.
Mike
__________________
"I think we’re starting to get to the point where people are starting to get tired of this stretch of ball,” Votto said. “I think something needs to start changing and start going in a different direction. I’m going to do my part to help make that change.”
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |