Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Good Hypothetical Discussion

  1. #1
    The Future is Now Ghosts of 1990's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    4,053

    Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Ok, so tonight I'm playing MLB 2k9 and on the game in my franchise Joey Votto and Jay Bruce are approaching some career milestones that are pretty impressive.

    500 Home Runs +
    Also Bruce looks to be a 3,000 hit guy.


    Here's the question I was pondering tonight.....

    If either one of these guys ends up being truly that special in this game, in terms of an all-time great, will the Reds really pony up the cash and keep them?

    I guess we'll be lucky to ever have to worry about it, but it's a funny thought. I guess I almost have the feeling that if either or both of these guys end up becoming megastars they'll be gone once they hit their prime.
    2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9
    2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
    2013 Attendance Record: 5-2 2014 Attendance Record: 3-1

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy Eric_the_Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    2,171

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    A) I think they would definitely pay to keep them around if they turn out to be studs. The organization has "given them the keys" so to speak, and if they turn out to be those types of players, I think they would sign them long term.

    B) 500 HR and 3,000 hits? How much do you play this game?! :

  4. #3
    Socratic Gadfly TheNext44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,228

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Cast has shown that he is willing to pay players what they are worth, or more, if he thinks they are key parts of the team. Harang, Arroyo, Phillips, Cordero...
    I think Votto and Bruce will be easier decisions than these guys.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West bye Gawd Virginia
    Posts
    1,184

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    I don't mean to re-hash this, really I don't...but why did the organization not see Adam Dunn as a possible lifer in a Reds uniform? I mean the man was easily on his way to being the Reds all time leader in HRs. I just feel that he is a possibly modern Babe Ruth, laugh if you want, but there is something special about that kid.

  6. #5
    Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy Eric_the_Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    2,171

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by will5979 View Post
    I don't mean to re-hash this, really I don't...but why did the organization not see Adam Dunn as a possible lifer in a Reds uniform? I mean the man was easily on his way to being the Reds all time leader in HRs. I just feel that he is a possibly modern Babe Ruth, laugh if you want, but there is something special about that kid.
    Probably something to do with the fact that his defense is also Ruth-like, and by Ruth-like I mean the Babe's corpse.

    Actually I think the corpse may have slightly more range and a better arm.

    If the Reds played in the AL and could hide Dunn at DH, then I think he would still be here.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    180

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by will5979 View Post
    I don't mean to re-hash this, really I don't...but why did the organization not see Adam Dunn as a possible lifer in a Reds uniform? I mean the man was easily on his way to being the Reds all time leader in HRs. I just feel that he is a possibly modern Babe Ruth, laugh if you want, but there is something special about that kid.
    There is no way this will end well.


    http://jeromesredscare.blogspot.com

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,198

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Adam Dunn.... Babe Ruth...

    Sure. that's a fair comparison...

  9. #8
    Member Captain Hook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    columbus,ohio
    Posts
    2,223

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Speaking of Dunn I thought it was funny to hear that Japans strategy against team USA was to simply hit the ball to Dunn.Wounder how many years teams have been doing this to the Reds?

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Blue Ash
    Posts
    2,616

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by REDblooded View Post
    Adam Dunn.... Babe Ruth...

    Sure. that's a fair comparison...
    I'm offended. I had it more like Adam Dunn........Willie Mays......
    Who's on first?

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West bye Gawd Virginia
    Posts
    1,184

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by REDblooded View Post
    Adam Dunn.... Babe Ruth...

    Sure. that's a fair comparison...
    ok laugh at me if you want. I like Adam Dunn and if he were a lifer Red he easily would have finished (barring injury) with over 600 career hrs as a Red. That would have been nice all things considered there isn't much to cheer about these days. I just look at the old school Reds jerseys of 1972-1992 on ebay and cry knowing our glory days our gone, we don't have a Pete Rose, Johnny Bench, or Barry Larkin. It was nice following someone that played with Larkin before he retired that could have been a lifer Red. There just isn't any players on this team besides Votto that I'm truely excited about. He is only 29 years old and will have over 300 hrs before the year ends. That was a good comparison about if the Reds had a DH.

    At least his loud hrs and dominance of the freakin Indians gave this Reds fan some joy this decade.
    Last edited by will5979; 03-23-2009 at 09:43 PM.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    180

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by will5979 View Post
    ok laugh at me if you want. I like Adam Dunn and if he were a lifer Red he easily would have finished (barring injury) with over 600 career hrs as a Red. That would have been nice all things considered there isn't much to cheer about these days. I just look at the old school Reds jerseys of 1972-1992 on ebay and cry knowing our glory days our gone, we don't have a Pete Rose, Johnny Bench, or Barry Larkin. It was nice following someone that played with Larkin before he retired that could have been a lifer Red. There just isn't any players on this team besides Votto that I'm truely excited about. He is only 29 years old and will have over 300 hrs before the year ends. That was a good comparison about if the Reds had a DH.

    At least his loud hrs and dominance of the freakin Indians gave this Reds fan some joy this decade.

    Way to not back down. Stand strong by the Big Donkey!!


    http://jeromesredscare.blogspot.com

  13. #12
    Member Nasty_Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    1st Place... Finally
    Posts
    1,191

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Could you imagine the past 8 seasons without Dunn? It's hard to imagine how much worse this team could have been... hell, he was the only reason to watch most Septembers.

    I agree about Dunn's potential standing in history. The man could put up some truely historic numbers and be seen as an alltime great power hitter... especially since he isn't under the cloud of steroids. If he hits 600+ HRs, he would be 1 of only 4-5 guys to achieve such a feat without PED's. I think he'll be looked on better in the future than how he's looked at now.
    I know a lot of people are talking about his on-base percentage (.308 in 2008), but I like to think more in terms of him his in-scoring position percentage. - Our Beloved Manager

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    180

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Nasty_Boy View Post
    Could you imagine the past 8 seasons without Dunn? It's hard to imagine how much worse this team could have been... hell, he was the only reason to watch most Septembers.

    I agree about Dunn's potential standing in history. The man could put up some truely historic numbers and be seen as an alltime great power hitter... especially since he isn't under the cloud of steroids. If he hits 600+ HRs, he would be 1 of only 4-5 guys to achieve such a feat without PED's. I think he'll be looked on better in the future than how he's looked at now.
    Agreed. From a historical context, people might give him more credit down the line, even if he never plays on a winning team. He's an enhanced Dave Kingman.

    http://jeromesredscare.blogspot.com

  15. #14
    The Future is Now Ghosts of 1990's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    4,053

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    I really didn't want this to turn into a Dunn thread but thats where it is going. And honestly I tend to agree with will. I have/had the same feelings with Dunn as a youngster as I do with Bruce, and potentially Votto.

    Say what you want about Dunn..... facts are facts. The guy was a premium commodity in baseball and the best player we had. He wasn't the best player in baseball, but he was a special talent based on the numbers he put up. I remember back in 2002 in his first full big league season a few surrounding the Reds said they'd believed that he'd retire as one of the all-time greatest Reds in history based on the numbers he'd put up. Somehow I just knew though, that he'd never last that long in Cincinnati, I knew the Reds would find some reason not to pay the guy and keep one of their own who'd actually been consistent enough to make it an argument.

    It's almost like the Reds were looking for reasons to get rid of Adam Dunn..... the bottom line is he could have been here for the next 5 years for a very reasonable amount. They didn't do it for one reason or another.

    Dunn is a stud of a ballplayer, although I think Bruce and Votto could end up better for different reasons Dunn does things that only he can do in this game.... Thats 40/100/ and play in 155+ games year in and year out.

    You have to wonder because of what happened with Dunn if the Reds aren't just a cheap organization. I mean, they have already had the chance to lock up Votto and Bruce long term and they have refused to do so. Other successful organizations that aren't cheap lock up their young talent and go on and win with it. The Indians did it with Sizemore. The Rays did it with Kazmir, Longoria, etc. The Cardinals did it with Pujols a few years back. For Gods sake at some point the Reds need to stop looking for reasons NOT to sign a guy longterm and make a commitment to their nucleus. I don't want examples like Harang, Phillips, etc. These guys all signed what isn't considered a long term contract. A long term contract is 5 years or more locking them up through their prime years. Thats how you build a winner.

    I dont think the Reds keeping Bruce and Votto long term is a sure thing. Because we are a cheap organization. Its almost like, if they aren't legit studs, they wont be here (obviously) and if they are they'll price themselves out of Cincinnati because we don't keep good players. It's sad. People wonder why we continiously aren't any good.
    2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9
    2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
    2013 Attendance Record: 5-2 2014 Attendance Record: 3-1

  16. #15
    The Future is Now Ghosts of 1990's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    4,053

    Re: Good Hypothetical Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerome View Post
    Agreed. From a historical context, people might give him more credit down the line, even if he never plays on a winning team. He's an enhanced Dave Kingman.

    http://jeromesredscare.blogspot.com
    No offense, but you really need to look at the facts that are out there.

    He's not Dave Kingman, other then they are both big, left handed hitters who strike out in abundance (there's a lot of other big bodied LH power hitters that do that too).

    Kingman NEVER had statistical seasons that could stack up to Dunn's let alone 5 or 6 of these special statistical seasons in a row. If he had played with the consistency Dunn has, we might be talking about Dave Kingman, Hall of Famer right now.
    2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9
    2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
    2013 Attendance Record: 5-2 2014 Attendance Record: 3-1


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25