Turn Off Ads?
Page 8 of 29 FirstFirst ... 45678910111218 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 424

Thread: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

  1. #106
    Mon chou Choo vaticanplum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    7,673

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    I swear to God Dusty is using a teleprompter in that commercial where he tells us we're watching the Reds.
    There is no such thing as a pitching prospect.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #107
    Member Reds Fanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Piqua, OH
    Posts
    19,727

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Lee with a bloop hit to center.

  4. #108
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern Maryland
    Posts
    13,807

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Bloop single, in every sense of the word bloop, for Lee. Right in on his hands, unlucky result.

  5. #109
    Member Reds Fanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Piqua, OH
    Posts
    19,727

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Bradley grounds out as Cueto just avoids the broken bat. 1 out runner on 2nd.

  6. #110
    Member Reds Fanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Piqua, OH
    Posts
    19,727

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Ramirez is hit in the hip by the pitch. 1st and 2nd.

  7. #111
    Making sense of it all Matt700wlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,537

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Beware of chunks of bat!

  8. #112
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern Maryland
    Posts
    13,807

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Does the ump really think that Cueto hit Ramirez on purpose? Because he ran out there like he expected Aramis to head to the mound...

  9. #113
    Member Reds Fanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Piqua, OH
    Posts
    19,727

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Soto grounds it to Edwin. Should have been an easy DP but Edwin bobbles it. He tags the runner at 3rd. So 1st and 2nd with 2 outs.

  10. #114
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern Maryland
    Posts
    13,807

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Man was that a tailor made DP ball that wasn't. Gack.

  11. #115
    Making sense of it all Matt700wlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,537

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Quote Originally Posted by membengal View Post
    Does the ump really think that Cueto hit Ramirez on purpose? Because he ran out there like he expected Aramis to head to the mound...
    I bet the Wrigley idiots did...

  12. #116
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    32,055

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Can't assume a DP, but that's twice this inning that one should have been turned.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!

  13. #117
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern Maryland
    Posts
    13,807

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    The Reds don't hit well enough to keep extending innings and giving the opposing team extra at-bats...

  14. #118
    Mon chou Choo vaticanplum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    7,673

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Edwin discovers a mysterious piece of leather at the end of his hand. It takes him slightly aback.
    There is no such thing as a pitching prospect.

  15. #119
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    38,000

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Quote Originally Posted by membengal View Post
    Man was that a tailor made DP ball that wasn't. Gack.
    You just know that will come back to bite them in the butt.

  16. #120
    Member mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    32,055

    Re: 4/22/09 - Reds vs. Cubs

    Quote Originally Posted by membengal View Post
    The Reds don't hit well enough to keep extending innings and giving the opposing team extra at-bats...
    Or pitch well enough for that matter.
    All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator