Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,089

    Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    Go BLUE!!!

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Socratic Gadfly TheNext44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,228

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    This is actually good news. If a teamed had claimed them, the Reds could only work out a deal with that team. Now they are free to shop them to any team.
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein

  4. #3
    High five! nate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    6,976

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNext44 View Post
    This is actually good news. If a teamed had claimed them, the Reds could only work out a deal with that team. Now they are free to shop them to any team.
    Yep.

    The Dodgers really need a starter right now.
    "Bring on Rod Stupid!"

  5. #4
    Worst Behavior. reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,481

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNext44 View Post
    This is actually good news. If a teamed had claimed them, the Reds could only work out a deal with that team. Now they are free to shop them to any team.
    Unless you are of the mindset that if they were claimed we would have let them walk.

  6. #5
    Greatness In The Making RedLegSuperStar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    4,078

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    I think the surprise will be if they get dealt. Personally I'd rather Arroyo go then Harang but if this team is hurting for money and think their are better options that will soon hit free agency then do it. If they are not adding payroll though I don't get the Rolen trade if they are paying his full 11 million next season. I wish this team had some kind of plan.
    "I could watch video of Griffey swinging all day. It's like baseball porn." - C. Trent Rosecrans


    2008 Reds Record When I Attend: 9W - 5L

    2009 Reds Record When I Attend: 1W - 2L

    2010 Reds Record When I Attend: 1W - 0L

    2011 Reds Record When I Attend: 0W - 1L

  7. #6
    Member Tom Servo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    7,910

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    My feeling is still that Harang has some value and shouldn't necessarily be sold at his lowest value. Basically, I don't just want to give him away.


    Arroyo however, I'd give up for a bag of balls.
    "Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement."

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,089

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    I think both can significantly improve their value with 2-3 more good outings before the end of the month.
    Go BLUE!!!

  9. #8
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    Honestly I would expect that neither has much trade value
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  10. #9
    Et tu, Brutus? Brutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    10,594

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by flyer85 View Post
    Honestly I would expect that neither has much trade value
    I'm still not sure about Arroyo, although right now, there are a lot of teams getting antsy for pitching help.

    Perhaps it's fair to say neither might not have much value in terms of getting much in return, but as far as simply taking the salaries off the Reds' hands, they might be able to pull that off.

    Personally, I'd trade Arroyo to anyone that will take him for a warm heartbeat, and keep Harang less I get something of value in return.
    "No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,089

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by flyer85 View Post
    Honestly I would expect that neither has much trade value
    If Arroyo strings together 2-3 more good starts, and the Sox continue to get desperate enough, Bronson and Theo's bromance may just cause Theo to panic and overpay.

    Who knows? He's done it before.
    Go BLUE!!!

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    14,322

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by flyer85 View Post
    Honestly I would expect that neither has much trade value

    Issue isn't trade value. Issue is whether anyone will take the contract of either of them. If the Reds want a meaningful player return, the Reds will have to pay much cash in the deal.

    Harang and Arroyo were signed before the big decline in FA contracts last winter. And both have slipped in performance. The result is a mismatch -- the contracts no longer fit the pitchers.

    The harsh reality is that the likely interest will be for Harang and nobody will offer much more than salary relief. In Arroyo's case, the likelihood is that the Reds would have to pay a considerable part of the contract in any trade.

    I don't see Bob paying much money for the privilege of shedding Bronson. So that deal is less likely to happen.

    The question is whether Bob will basically give Harang away to reduce the team's payroll commitments.

    My answer is probably yes. Harang's numbers the last two years may be an aberration, but he is a fly ball pitcher in a home run paradise and, all emotions aside, the deal probably has to be made.

  13. #12
    Member OnBaseMachine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    34,844

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    Harang is still a solid big league pitcher. The only way I'd trade him is if I get a good prospect or two in return.
    I miss Adam Dunn.

  14. #13
    Where's my chair? REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    21,345

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    I guess I don't see the point in giving either player away.

    Likewise for Weathers. I hope we get a decent prospect for him. I'm not expecting a Jay Bruce type, but a decent prospect.

    For everyone bemoaning the contracts, don't they expire at the end of 2010 anyhow?
    If we give Bronson away, are we going to get anyone better on the FA market at the same price? Not likely, since the Reds have to overpay people to come here.

    I'm all for trading anyone if we get fair value, but I'm not going to help LA, Boston or any contender by giving them Harang or Arroyo. Those teams need pitching help more than we need salary relief. Once Walt gets a reputation for just giving players away, he's not going to be a in a good bargaining position for the future (much like the Pirates, who get lowballed all the time).
    Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2010-2014!

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,089

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by REDREAD View Post
    I guess I don't see the point in giving either player away.

    Likewise for Weathers. I hope we get a decent prospect for him. I'm not expecting a Jay Bruce type, but a decent prospect.

    For everyone bemoaning the contracts, don't they expire at the end of 2010 anyhow?
    If we give Bronson away, are we going to get anyone better on the FA market at the same price? Not likely, since the Reds have to overpay people to come here.

    I'm all for trading anyone if we get fair value, but I'm not going to help LA, Boston or any contender by giving them Harang or Arroyo. Those teams need pitching help more than we need salary relief. Once Walt gets a reputation for just giving players away, he's not going to be a in a good bargaining position for the future (much like the Pirates, who get lowballed all the time).
    Agreed, although I'd argue that the Pirates got anything but lowballed this year (see the Sanchez-Alderson trade and the rest of their deadline deals.)
    Go BLUE!!!

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    14,322

    Re: Arroyo and Harang clear waivers

    Quote Originally Posted by OnBaseMachine View Post
    Harang is still a solid big league pitcher. The only way I'd trade him is if I get a good prospect or two in return.

    It would hurt, but the deal probably needs to be made.

    Over the last two years Harang is 12-30 (W-L) with an
    ERA of about 4.6. The NL league average ERA this year for a starting pitcher is 4.32. He's allowed 57 homers in 2008 and 2009 combined so far. Even considering the GABP effect, Harang has -- generously -- been an average starter the last two years. Most people would likely say below average.

    His best attribute is his sturdiness. He throws a ton of games and innings and he has great mechanics so he seldom misses a turn. But for how long will he be effective given all the innings he's compiled? He's thrown over 1,300 innings.

    On top of this, he is only signed for one more year and then there is an option. If they keep him, he costs $12.5 million next year and then has a $2 million buyout reportedly. (If the Reds picked up his option after 2010, the salary amounts are even higher.) So Harang is likely gone after next year anyway.

    Harang seems like a great guy and teammate and he would be a huge loss in terms of the community and the Reds' identity. But in terms of dollars and cents and being able to put together the best team, a trade of his contract makes sense, even if the player return is modest.
    Last edited by Kc61; 08-10-2009 at 07:05 PM.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25