Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Tiger Woods win % better than the Reds

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    7,719

    Tiger Woods win % better than the Reds

    and 9 other teams since 2006.
    From espn.com

    1:06 p.m.: OK, one more Tiger stat, as I posted on Twitter yesterday ...

    JasonSobel Great stat from ESPN Research Dept.: Since start of '06, Tiger Woods has a better winning percentage than 10 different MLB teams. Wow.

    JasonSobel Since you asked... those 10 teams are: Marlins, Padres, M's, Rays, Giants, Reds, O's, Royals, Pirates and Nats. All lower than TW's 48.98%. In related news, Chez Reavie owned a better winning percentage than the Detroit Lions last season.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member Homer Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    4,700

    Re: Tiger Woods win % better than the Reds

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoosier Red View Post
    and 9 other teams since 2006.
    From espn.com

    1:06 p.m.: OK, one more Tiger stat, as I posted on Twitter yesterday ...

    JasonSobel Great stat from ESPN Research Dept.: Since start of '06, Tiger Woods has a better winning percentage than 10 different MLB teams. Wow.

    JasonSobel Since you asked... those 10 teams are: Marlins, Padres, M's, Rays, Giants, Reds, O's, Royals, Pirates and Nats. All lower than TW's 48.98%. In related news, Chez Reavie owned a better winning percentage than the Detroit Lions last season.
    Tiger has a 48.98% winning percentage since '06? I find that hard to believe. His career average is about 23% (which is incredible, and the record), but 49% over the last 3 years is hard to believe. I'm too lazy to calculate myself though.

  4. #3
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: Tiger Woods win % better than the Reds

    Quote Originally Posted by Homer Bailey View Post
    Tiger has a 48.98% winning percentage since '06? I find that hard to believe. His career average is about 23% (which is incredible, and the record), but 49% over the last 3 years is hard to believe. I'm too lazy to calculate myself though.
    Not when you consider he was out for most of 2008.

    It's his winning % in events entered, which is different than winning % in total events.

    Lemme do some quick research....

    2006 - 20 events entered, 10 victories
    2007 - 18 events entered, 8 victories
    2008 - 7 events entered, 5 victories
    2009 - 12 event entered, 5 victories

    So, that's 57 events entered, 28 victories, which is a 49.12% winning %.

    Even if you only count 2007 to the present, that's 37 events, 18 victories, which is a 48.65% winning %.

  5. #4
    Member GADawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Athens, Georgia
    Posts
    2,336

    Re: Tiger Woods win % better than the Reds

    yep sure but he's operating on an unlimited payroll!! He's large market!!

  6. #5
    Member Redhook's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,557

    Re: Tiger Woods win % better than the Reds

    Wow. That's incredible. I didn't know his % was that high in recent years. He's really good at the game of golf.
    "....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator