Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,419

    The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    As if Fays story yesterday wasnt enough, other writers are getting in on the action.

    Hal Mccoy yesterday
    http://www.daytondailynews.com/blogs...cxtype=feedbot

    ďI talk to the players about all this, but as manager I donít have to talk to anybody about anything,Ē Baker said. ďItís just Iíve always done as a manager. As a player you always like to know why things were done.:

    Uh, well, OK. Is it really that complicated. Iím no manager (my card expired in 1982), but it just doesnít seem THAT complicated, especially when youíre 156 games under .500 and 14 games out of first place on August 15.
    Fay today on his blog after the game
    http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs...cincinnati.com
    What a way to lose a game.


    The Reds were leading 4-3 in the eighth. Nick Masset got an out to start the inning.


    Dusty Baker brought in Arthur Rhodes to face Adam Dunn to get left-on-left matchup.


    Rhodes hit Dunn with the first pitch.


    So much for the percentages. Rhodeswould have to face righties the rest of the inning.

    Go get em boys!

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,188

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    Theres plenty of room on "Straight out of town" Express.
    Quote Originally Posted by moewan View Post
    Barmaid to patron "Sir you are slurring, I am going to have to cut you off"

    Patron to barmaid "I'm not slurring, I'm speaking in cursive"


  4. #3
    Member mroby85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,282

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    So easy to sit back and point out things like this. Arthur Rhodes has probably been a better pitcher against Righties than Nick Massett if I were to guess this year? + there was a lefty that has the pop to tie the game at the plate, along with a tendency to strike out agains a tough left hander, but they're right, that move was totally stupid.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,006

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    Took 'em long enough, dusty should have been fired last year. Worst manager in the bigs.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    664

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    When we first hired Dusty, I didn't think it was a bad hire. Wow, have things changed. How has this guy been the only guy to win a playoff series with Chicago in 100 years, was a blown inning away from a World Series with that team, another blown inning away from winning the World Series with the Giants, and a 3 time manager of the year.

    I don't get it, maybe on teams already built for success who just need a players manager, he can succeed. I don't see why he continues to put the two worst possible players and has the worst two players statistically batting #1 and #2 in the order EVERY TIME.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,006

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    Quote Originally Posted by LouisvilleCARDS View Post
    When we first hired Dusty, I didn't think it was a bad hire. Wow, have things changed. How has this guy been the only guy to win a playoff series with Chicago in 100 years, was a blown inning away from a World Series with that team, another blown inning away from winning the World Series with the Giants, and a 3 time manager of the year.

    I don't get it, maybe on teams already built for success who just need a players manager, he can succeed. I don't see why he continues to put the two worst possible players and has the worst two players statistically batting #1 and #2 in the order EVERY TIME.
    Steroids played a big part in dusty's success.

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    664

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Burton View Post
    Steroids played a big part in dusty's success.
    Eh, thats a copout to say it was just because of Bonds. I mean in 1993 he turned around the Giants and they won 31 more games than the previous year. It's not like the guy has had bad years constantly as a manager, its just he doesn't exactly make a team like the Reds better. With how crappy the roster is, he just makes it worse with some of his moves.

    He's a players manager, and for some teams thats all thats needed. On teams with a lot of primma donnas he could do well. If he was the manager for the BoSox while Manny was there, I'm sure he could have probably found a way to smooth it over.

  9. #8
    malingered here too long malcontent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    3,239

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    ďI talk to the players about all this, but as manager I donít have to talk to anybody about anything,Ē Baker said.

    Read: "I have neither the time nor the mental capacity to explain my managerial strategy."

  10. #9
    ZCTRMTP!!!!! texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,822

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    Quote Originally Posted by malcontent View Post
    ďI talk to the players about all this, but as manager I donít have to talk to anybody about anything,Ē Baker said.

    Read: "I have neither the time nor the mental capacity to explain my managerial strategy."
    Bakermetrics is college-level material, dude.

  11. #10
    malingered here too long malcontent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    3,239

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    Quote Originally Posted by texasdave View Post
    Bakermetrics is college-level material, dude.
    Over my head, for sure.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    7,585

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    Good.

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    37

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    Im so glad hal mccoy is retiring its just 15 years too late he is an idoit

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Bloomington, Ind.
    Posts
    376

    Re: The writers are even turning on Dusty now.

    Quote Originally Posted by edogg07 View Post
    Im so glad hal mccoy is retiring its just 15 years too late he is an idoit
    yes, an "idoit." no duobt.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25