Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Thoughts on the Acta hire

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Powell, Ohio
    Posts
    114

    Thoughts on the Acta hire

    The indians have named Manny Acta their next manager according to Tim Kurkjian. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4593663 I was wondering what everybody thinks about the hire.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    ZCTRMTP!!!!!
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,480

    Re: Thoughts on the Acta hire

    All I have to say is that Manny Acta must be one of the best interviewers in the game today. He was one of the finalists down here in Houston as well. I know he didn't have much help in D.C., but his record was horrendous. His team's winning percentage was trending severely downwards with him at the helm.

    Code:
    2007 - .451
    2008 - .366
    2009 - .299
    He had his team on pace to win the staggeringly low total of 48 games before he was relieved of duty. You wouldn't think those sorts of numbers would look good on a resume. His replacement, Jim Riggleman, coaxed a .440 winning percentage out of that same team. That dead cat really bounced for him.

    But I am certain Acta relates well with today's player and blah blah blah.


    So mark me down as saying I think this is a great hire for the Indians. And I hope they lose 100 games next season. And every season thereafter for all eternity.

  4. #3
    The Future is Now Ghosts of 1990's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    4,010

    Re: Thoughts on the Acta hire

    I think it's a terrible hire. Look up Manny Acta's career sub .370 winning percentage. I think at best you're looking at .500 in Cleveland. they went cheap. There's no way Mattingly/Bobby Valentine weren't better options.
    2009 Attendance Record: 3-5
    2010 Attendance Record: 2-9
    2011 Attendance Record: 3-4
    2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
    2013 Attendance Record: 5-2

  5. #4
    ZCTRMTP!!!!!
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,480

    Re: Thoughts on the Acta hire

    Quote Originally Posted by JayBruce32 View Post
    I think it's a terrible hire. Look up Manny Acta's career sub .370 winning percentage. I think at best you're looking at .500 in Cleveland. they went cheap. There's no way Mattingly/Bobby Valentine weren't better options.
    Yes, but he once was heard using the word sabermetrics (not to be confused with Bakermetrics) and that alone places him in the top five managers in the majors.

  6. #5
    Member SidneySlicker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    613

    Re: Thoughts on the Acta hire

    Quote Originally Posted by texasdave View Post
    All I have to say is that Manny Acta must be one of the best interviewers in the game today. He was one of the finalists down here in Houston as well. I know he didn't have much help in D.C., but his record was horrendous. His team's winning percentage was trending severely downwards with him at the helm.

    Code:
    2007 - .451
    2008 - .366
    2009 - .299
    He had his team on pace to win the staggeringly low total of 48 games before he was relieved of duty. You wouldn't think those sorts of numbers would look good on a resume. His replacement, Jim Riggleman, coaxed a .440 winning percentage out of that same team. That dead cat really bounced for him.

    But I am certain Acta relates well with today's player and blah blah blah.


    So mark me down as saying I think this is a great hire for the Indians. And I hope they lose 100 games next season. And every season thereafter for all eternity.

    Yes, but now he'll have more to work with than just Cincinnati Reds retreads.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25