Excellent analysis.
The one point I would make is that salaries are down right now and probably will be down even further after this off season. Right now a win is worth $4.4M if I recall correctly. That is down from what it was just two years ago, when it was closer to $6M a win. I think after this off season, with everyone cutting back, a win could worth as low as $2.5M.
So signing guys long term after this off season could really pan out well if the market bounces back, which history tells us it will. Votto signed at 75% of 2010 value, in 2012 could be Votto signed at 50% of value.
I also think that with Votto's problems last year, he's not as much of a known quantity as you think. He has not played a full season, which should lower his value, and make the long term contract worth it.
So 75%
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein
too early. give him, at least, another year to show he can play a full healthy season.
"My mission is to be the ray of hope, the guy who stands out there on that beautiful field and owns up to his mistakes and lets people know it's never completely hopeless, no matter how bad it seems at the time. I have a platform and a message, and now I go to bed at night, sober and happy, praying I can be a good messenger." -Josh Hamilton
Not yet. Not only is it to soon given his mental health status, its also a bit early given what you have in the minors that you also need to figure out that involves him directly (either keeping him and moving Alonso, moving him to LF and keeping both, keeping Alonso and figuring out if Frazier/Heisey/Francisco can play LF or any other of the 15 scenarios) that can likely be figured out before the end of 2010.
The Longoria deal was a huge risk for the Rays as well. IIRC they signed him to that deal only very shortly after he played in his first major league game.
I think the Reds should look at locking up Votto long term within the next season. I would do the same with Bruce in the next 1.5 years as long as he develops. Pitchers are a little more risky, but if Bailey and Cueto are in the long term plans I would look at buying out their arbitration as well. It may be a lot to do, but if those 4 players are in your long term plans, locking them up early makes sense.
I'd rather keep the productive players as long as we possibly can.
Every productive player on the roster is one less hole to fill.
That's why I liked the Rolen trade. Yes, it added payroll, but some of that was offset by Toronto and dumping Weathers/Harriston/etc
IMO, it's not a stretch that we can make it over .500 next year with reasonable health. There are holes, but not overwhelming. It's theoretically possible to add a SS and a decent OF and be a contender in the weak central. Maybe it's not likely, but it's possible.
As soon as we go into Pirate mode.. trading Arroyo and Cordero.. forget about it. It's rare that anyone gives up even average ML ready young players anymore. Look at Cleveland's fire sale this last year. Traded 3 star players (VMartinez, Cliff Lee, and ?) , and only got one ML ready guy in return.. Sorry the specific names are escaping me now.
Nothing wrong with trying to win as many games as possible in 2010 and trying to wake up the slumbering fan base. I don't agree with this notion that unless we have a strong chance to contend, we might as well burn the team to the ground and play rookies. I've seen enough Anderson Machados and Brandon Larsons getting playing time because the team is "rebuilding". I'm tired of that.
[Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob
Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
Due to the fact that the Reds have Alonso in the pipeline, I do not sign Votto longterm. He's a great player, but he's a 1b.
With the declining salaries, it just doesn't make sense to hand out a 5 year contract now, just to maybe save a couple of million.
Signing Votto to a longterm contract makes it potentially impossible to trade him.
Look at Lyle Overbay. I think Votto is better than him, but Overbay really been up and down. Toronto gave him a long contract and he's immovable now.
[Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob
Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
You build your team around great players. Last season Votto proved that he was the real deal, especially with his slump and then bounce back at the end of the season. If Alonso shows that he has the ability to become another great player then you move Votto off to LF.
If you sign Votto to a good, long term deal then it only increases his trade value. FWIW Overbay has never produced a season as good as Votto has in his young career.
I'd say yes after next season. I love the guy and expect him to continue to do well but I always have had a rule of waiting and making a guy prove any good season before a LTC. I believe he will but I think he'd be no more expensive if we waited another year so might as well wait.
"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."
--Woody Hayes
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |