"Okay you guys, pair up in threes!" --Yogi Berra
Like Tom Brady, I think you can give the first super bowl to them just because of the defense. The 2nd(and third for Brady) the quarterbacks played just as large of a role.
When people say that I donít know what Iím talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
Oh, I don't disagree that he's a good QB, and I should've left the comment about the defense out of it. But I'm just not willing to enshrine him in Canton just because his team won the Super Bowl twice, but I have a feeling that his ticket is punched because of it.
Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy.
* Attended the 1990 and 2010 Reds Division clinchers *
Watched the 2012 Clincher on FOX.
Proud owner of a 1990 Dodge Class B Motorhome: A chick magnet!
Great YOUTUBE videos.
He isn't dominant- his receivers aren't dominant. The offense isn't dominant.
If you put him on the Chiefs, he wouldn't make them any better.
That team is good because of its defense- when you allow 3.2 yards a carry, nobody is going to do much to you.
Roethlisberger is not a hall of famer, and his assertion that after Brees, Manning, and Brady, his name is next, he is dreaming. I'd rather have Schaub, Rivers, Palmer just to name a few.
He lets his defense go to his head.
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.