"Okay you guys, pair up in threes!" --Yogi Berra
Like Tom Brady, I think you can give the first super bowl to them just because of the defense. The 2nd(and third for Brady) the quarterbacks played just as large of a role.
When people say that I donít know what Iím talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
Oh, I don't disagree that he's a good QB, and I should've left the comment about the defense out of it. But I'm just not willing to enshrine him in Canton just because his team won the Super Bowl twice, but I have a feeling that his ticket is punched because of it.
Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy.
* Attended the 1990 and 2010 Reds Division clinchers *
Watched the 2012 Clincher on FOX.
Proud owner of a 1990 Dodge Class B Motorhome: A chick magnet!
Great YOUTUBE videos.
He isn't dominant- his receivers aren't dominant. The offense isn't dominant.
If you put him on the Chiefs, he wouldn't make them any better.
That team is good because of its defense- when you allow 3.2 yards a carry, nobody is going to do much to you.
Roethlisberger is not a hall of famer, and his assertion that after Brees, Manning, and Brady, his name is next, he is dreaming. I'd rather have Schaub, Rivers, Palmer just to name a few.
He lets his defense go to his head.