Turn Off Ads?
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789
Results 121 to 127 of 127

Thread: Bengals vs Raiders

  1. #121
    Just The Big Picture macro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    The Bluegrass State
    Posts
    6,150

    Re: Bengals vs Raiders

    Quote Originally Posted by Redsfaithful View Post
    From what I've read they are technically the 2 seed right now based on opponent strength.
    Yep, I saw that after I made that reply. I just don't have any faith that they're going to end up #2 at this point. Hopefully they'll surprise me.

    Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #122
    Titanic Struggles Caveat Emperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The 513
    Posts
    12,560

    Re: Bengals vs Raiders

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    Probably because Oakland positively stinks against the run.
    And Oakland actually has some decent playmakers in their defensive secondary.
    Championships Matter.
    23 Years and Counting...

  4. #123
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,736

    Re: Bengals vs Raiders

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    Probably because Oakland positively stinks against the run.
    No excuse to not adjust during the game.

  5. #124
    Member Playadlc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sellersburg, Indiana
    Posts
    2,289

    Re: Bengals vs Raiders

    Just gotta bounce back.

    Get Benson back and healthy and we will be fine.
    DLC11@Insightbb.com

  6. #125
    Moderator The Operator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Carlisle, OH
    Posts
    2,609

    Re: Bengals vs Raiders

    I think someone has already pointed this out, but other than Bernard Scott's 61-yard run; he averaged 2.9 yards per carry today. Leonard averaged 2.8.

    On top of that, maybe I was seeing it wrong but it seemed to me they were calling Cedric Benson running plays for Bernard Scott. He is not a running back that can bust it up the middle between the tackles, IMO. That's a guy like Benson or LJ (that guy they only gave the ball twice).

    Running Jeremi Johnson and watching him fumble the ball away when you had LJ standing on the sidelines is unforgivable to me. Why sign him if they don't plan to use him?

    I still see this as a Bob Bratkowski failure to properly plan or react in game. You can't keep calling the same plays with different personnel with different skills. But that's always been his forte. And you can just about guarantee he won't adjust either.

    It also doesn't help that the "franchise" kicker missed a 37 yard field goal. Seriously, HOW does that happen?

  7. #126
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,419

    Re: Bengals vs Raiders

    The only real problem I had with the play calling was the Jeremi Johnson run. I just dont see why you do that.

  8. #127
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    177

    Re: Bengals vs Raiders

    Probably because Oakland positively stinks against the run.
    Oakland has been awful against the run (31st in the NFL coming into yesterday). However, two reasons behind that are how much their D has been asked to be out on the field... combined with always playing from behind when teams are more prone to run. Trust me Russell at qb handicapped this team I think worse than we all can imagine. The D has just been on the field too much.

    In the Raiders win against the Eagles (also Russell's best game, they won 13-9 he threw for 220+), Oakland held the Eagles to 60 yards on the ground. With Oakland being able to put a semi-productive offensive effort they can man the fort against the run decently.

    The failure off Brat to adjust to this, is the big problem I have. In game adjustments have been a problem for years. I do not argue with the philosophical gameplan to run the ball.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25