He'll need to get the Oprah session taken care of by September 9, 2011.Originally Posted by NJReds
He'll need to get the Oprah session taken care of by September 9, 2011.
Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy.
She'd come out of retirement for Tiger. It'd be a prime-time special.He'll need to get the Oprah session taken care of by September 9, 2011.
"The players make the manager, it's never the other way." - Sparky Anderson
I read on a different board where someone stated they thought Tiger had taken steroids, it's a definite possibility.
Does the PGA test for steroids?
I'm pretty sure they do now, not sure when that went into effect.
They do now, and IIRC, Tiger was one of the ones asking for the testing.
Its a definite possibility that any athlete has done so. What's that got to do with cheating on your wife?
A little extra testosterone never hurt anyone in the sack.
The guy on the other board was questioning his decision making. He also mentioned the increased test levels from 'roids, allowing him to pursue these "conquests".
Tiger added a good amount of mass pretty quickly, I'd say he dabbled.
So...is Tiger still in serious condition?
My dad got to enjoy 3 Reds World Championships by the time he was my age. So far, I've only gotten to enjoy one. Step it up Redlegs!
Which, unfortunately, doesn't mean much these days. He could say that he wants testing, which would be smart, and still use something without testing positive. Noway to know for sure.
Nothing, it's just a quick kick in the gut in the heat of the scrum.
Saw this on yahoo:
Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:28 pm EST
Fellow PGA pros speak out on Tiger Woods: 'A phony and a fake'
By Jay Busbee
This is how bad it's getting for Tiger Woods: even his fellow pros are now starting to speak out against him.
First it was Jesper Parnevik expressing his frustration and disappointment, saying he "probably thought [Woods] was a better guy than he is." But Parnevik's outrage is understandable, given that he was the one who initially introduced Elin Nordegren to Tiger Woods.
Now, however, two players with no apparent direct connection to the scandal are taking their shots at Tiger. Ben Crane, an eight-year pro with two wins on the PGA Tour, and Charles Warren, a six-year veteran of the PGA Tour, each sharply criticized Woods, on the record, in the current issue of Life & Style magazine. (Visor tip: Sports By Brooks)
"This is no surprise to anyone who knows Tiger," said Crane, pictured above. "He's a phony and a fake and he can't retain that squeaky-clean endorsement deal any longer."
Crane also hinted that Elin Woods could have known all about Woods' alleged extramarital activities. "She's no fool," he said, and speculated that she possibly "turned a blind eye because of the money and the kids and the lifestyle he provides."
Warren also had a bit of advice for Elin, with uncompromising words for Woods. "She was very young when Jesper introduced them," Warren said. "She had stars in her eyes and maybe dollar signs too. But no, she should not stay with him. What kind of message would that send to her sister and mother and all the women out there? That your husband can be a bastard but as long as he makes the deal worthwhile, you'll stay?"
Today's PGA pros owe at least a quarter of everything they've earned to Tiger, who raised the game's prominence and, in turn, their paychecks. But Crane's comments indicate that Tiger's alleged proclivities were an open secret among Tour players.
Crane and Warren will no doubt catch grief for their comments, but what's the bigger transgression (to coin a phrase) -- speaking out against the PGA's golden goose, or keeping a secret to preserve your own good fortune?
We all know that means nothing. David Ortiz says hello.
Serious condition is relativeSo...is Tiger still in serious condition?
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Reply With Quote