Fwiw, I'd prefer ONE comp pick for teams that have lost 3 or more players more.
Fwiw, I'd prefer ONE comp pick for teams that have lost 3 or more players more.
I vote yes for compensation. I lost 6 players! My team was already shabby before losing anyone
1 pick after the 1st round for the first 3 players you lose. Another pick after the 2nd round for the next 3 players you lose...Seriously my team is bad. And its twice as good as the trash I started with last year from whoever gave up on this team. The compensation picks would be huge for me
Final Standings for 2010:
Code:1. Dublin Clovers 90.5 2. Montana Reds 83.5 3. m$b 68.5 4. Dusty's Meat Grinder 68 5. Efrat Invaders 58.5 6. New York Knights 44 7. NJ Red Machine 43 8. The Terribles 34.5 9. Wii Not Fitt 32.5 10. thatcoolguy_22 27 Last standings update: Mon Oct 04 03:25am MDT
__________________
"I think we’re starting to get to the point where people are starting to get tired of this stretch of ball,” Votto said. “I think something needs to start changing and start going in a different direction. I’m going to do my part to help make that change.”
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Reply With Quote