Turn Off Ads?

View Poll Results: Sign Jay Bruce Long term before Opening Day 2010?

Voters
41. You may not vote on this poll
  • Definitely

    15 36.59%
  • Absolutely not

    20 48.78%
  • Not real sure, here's why

    6 14.63%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: To sign or....

  1. #1
    BobC, get a legit F.O.! Mario-Rijo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Springfield, Ohio
    Posts
    9,052

    To sign or....

    ......not to sign, Jay Bruce prior to Opening Day? Consider the following.....

    Longoriaís a different animal. His agent, Paul Cohen, ought to have a very, very short client list after negotiating that disaster of a contract for Longoria. The Rays control him through 2016, when he will still cost a maximum of $14,050,000. And thatís if he makes the All-Star team and fulfills incentives related to MVP voting. Of all the people listed so far, Longoria might represent the most valuable asset
    Longoria LINK

    Although Justin (Upton) will only earn $500,000 this year aside from his $1.25 million bonus, he has already earned longtime security after only two full MLB seasons. Justin will earn $14.5 million in the final year of his contract in 2015, the second largest contract in the history of the Diamondbacks (6 years 51.25 mill).
    Upton LINK

    I think you must sign these potential superstars to long term deals early to keep them. The timing of such a deal is the most important aspect of it all and I think now is the time before he goes thru the roof. These deals aren't for every prospect but Bruce I think is a special case. Using these prior deals shouldn't we try to nestle Bruce in between the 2 (say 7-8 years 55 million) before he explodes? Also let's not forget he is not far from arbitration and Ryan Howard got 10 million on his 1st year in arb.
    "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

    --Woody Hayes

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,115

    Re: To sign or....

    I love the idea of locking up young stars. I need more from Jay Bruce before I can endorse the Reds doing so. He has had 3 hot streaks since June 2008. June 2008, September 2008, and September 2009. No arguing the potential. I just want a little more information before I commit.
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  4. #3
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,296

    Re: To sign or....

    I said not sure, because we don't know what the terms would be. Would I sign him like he just had 2 years like Lincecum? Not in a million years. But if the terms were reasonable for the organization, I'd give it thought since you'd be buying low.

  5. #4
    Senor Votto Degenerate39's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,914

    Re: To sign or....

    I'd be more concerned with signing Votto long term
    Most Vottomatic Player

  6. #5
    Waitin til next year bucksfan2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    10,108

    Re: To sign or....

    Until Bruce shows more consistency I would hold off on extending him long term. If he shows a better overall plate approach then I would look into locking him up longer term this off season.

    As mentioned above Votto would be my #1 priority.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    10,067

    Re: To sign or....

    Too soon.
    "Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini

  8. #7
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,225

    Re: To sign or....

    Money is an asset, don't throw it at folks until you have to.

  9. #8
    Member paulrichjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Savannah, TN
    Posts
    2,876

    Re: To sign or....

    Quote Originally Posted by Degenerate39 View Post
    I'd be more concerned with signing Votto long term
    Before I opened the thread I was thinking it would be about Votto. When I saw Bruce I thought, "Why?" He needs to prove himself a little more. Votto on the other hand was a special hitter last year. You have to start thinking about him.
    Tim McCarver: Baseball Quotes
    I remember one time going out to the mound to talk with Bob Gibson. He told me to get back behind the batter, that the only thing I knew about pitching was that it was hard to hit.

  10. #9
    Battle Toad Historian thatcoolguy_22's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    in tornado alley
    Posts
    1,755

    Re: To sign or....

    After Votto's 2009 how cheap would a LTC now actually be? Longoria spent all of a week or so in the bigs before the Rays locked him up for pennies. After Bruce's 2009 his value might not ever be lower. Just another way of looking at it. Of course I want Votto signed first, but just saying.
    "Last week I helped my friend stay put. It's a lot easier'n helpin' 'em move. I just went over to his house and made sure that he did not start to load **** into a truck."

  11. #10
    Matt's Dad RANDY IN INDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Brownsburg, Indiana
    Posts
    15,268

    Re: To sign or....

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    Money is an asset, don't throw it at folks until you have to.
    Now that makes too much sense.
    Talent is God Given: be humble.
    Fame is man given: be thankful.
    Conceit is self given: be careful.

    John Wooden

  12. #11
    BobC, get a legit F.O.! Mario-Rijo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Springfield, Ohio
    Posts
    9,052

    Re: To sign or....

    Hmm, early yet but I gotta say I'm surprised at the lack of vision. After this year he will cost us a ridiculous sum of money, comparitively speaking of course. Oh I know he hasn't done it yet and Loganbuck makes an interesting point I'll say that but I don't know why one would wait here. You have to be able to evaluate a player on what he is likely to do if you want to make the most of your dollar. And in this case you could save lots of that particular asset. Sans some kind of catastrophic injury I think Jay is a wise investment and signing him now may allow you to hold onto that one additional player. I think you now have to wait on Votto to have a bit of a down season to get any kind of bargain.

    But with Bruce the time to strike is now IMO. Jay is 22 (23 in April) and Joey is 26 (27 in sept.), a 6 year deal for Jay right now (below the annual cost of Justin Uptons deal) does multiple things for ya. It buys ya 1 and 1/2 half years of his FA years and gives you cost certainty throughout the life of the deal. He's still in the middle of his prime (29) at the end of it and Votto is 33 and thru his prime. It allows for us to keep both thru their primes. You wait for him to break out and both will command top dollar soon and now you likely have to decide between the 2 of them IMO.
    "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

    --Woody Hayes

  13. #12
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,225

    Re: To sign or....

    Lack of vision?

    The team controls him for a few more years, he hasn't produced a season that would be worth him going to arb, and if he does this year it will be exactly one season of production.

    A smart GM knows what his players are worth relative to their position and the fact is as good as Bruce can be he's not even in the position to command a multi year big figure contract yet.

  14. #13
    Member Marc D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,714

    Re: To sign or....

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    Money is an asset, don't throw it at folks until you have to.

    By the time you "know" you have to, you have to throw a lot more.

    Overpaying for what they think is certainty is probably the most common mistake people make in any market.

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,591

    Re: To sign or....

    Austin Kearns.

    So you sign your young can't miss outfielder to a long term contract and nothing can go wrong.

    If Jay wants to lock himself up at a gimme price? sure I'll listen to his agent talk and depending on the concession made maybe I'll even sign the contract. But bad things happen to young players all the time.
    "Even a bad day at the ballpark beats the snot out of most other good days. I'll take my scorecard and pencil and beer and hot dog and rage at the dips and cheer at the highs, but I'm not ever going to stop loving this game and this team and nobody will ever take that away from me." Roy Tucker October 2010

  16. #15
    Member Marc D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,714

    Re: To sign or....

    Quote Originally Posted by dfs View Post
    Austin Kearns.

    So you sign your young can't miss outfielder to a long term contract and nothing can go wrong.

    If Jay wants to lock himself up at a gimme price? sure I'll listen to his agent talk and depending on the concession made maybe I'll even sign the contract. But bad things happen to young players all the time.

    You price the risk of him not panning out into your offer. There is no way to avoid risk completely.

    Right now the Reds have the advantage with Bruce and can exploit the fact people hate to lose money more than they like to win it. A LTC can essentially be positioned like an insurance policy for him to his agent. If something goes wrong he has coverage. The big money he would be passing on as a FA (if he indeed gets to that position) is the premium he pays for that insurance policy.

    Once he has a big season his agent is going to be operating more from the "hope for gain" mindset than the "fear of loss" and the reds lose some leverage. The agent will anchor to a bigger number in his head and that will now become the figure the Reds are negotiating from.

    Also, lets say Bruce plays in 150+ games and OPS's over .900. Does that give us a guarantee of future performance? Does it eliminate injury risk? No it doesn't. All it does is drive the price for his services up without actually reducing risk at all. That line of thinking falls under representative bias i.e. past performance is a true indicator of future success.

    I don't see the sense in avoiding risk cheaply now out of a fear of being wrong, for taking the same risk later at a higher price.


Turn Off Ads?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25