Turn Off Ads?
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 48

Thread: Defense

  1. #31
    Socratic Gadfly TheNext44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,230

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    I wonder if we're confusing defensive performance with defensive talent. There's no doubt that the defense has not performed well this year, but what should we expect moving forward? Here's my really, really quick and dirty analysis (25 GS minimum)

    C: Herandez, Hanigan = Hernandez, Hanigan
    1B: Votto > Votto, Hernandez
    2B: Phillips = Phillips
    3B: Rolen > Rosales, EE, Rolen, Hairston
    SS: Cabrera, Janish < Gonzalez, Janish, Hairston
    LF: Gomes, Dickerson, Nix < Nix, Gomes, Dickerson
    CF: Stubbs > Taveras, Stubbs
    RF: Bruce > Bruce, Gomes

    I know this doesn't include scale, but so far as I can see, we should be better in 4 spots, equal in 2, and worse in 2. I guess the question comes to how much damage Cabrera and Gomes are doing -- because otherwise we should be as good or better.
    Thanks again for solid analysis, but just for clarification, it should be Votto/Cairo = Votto/Hernandez
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Pook's Hill
    Posts
    2,068

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by Spring~Fields View Post
    What's he do with regular playing time, anyone know? I think that we have seen the rest, at least up to this point. Are Mr. Gomes and Mr. Stubbs, really that good at producing that they can't have an extra day off? Or are we just hoping that if they play enough and long enough that they will come out of it?

    Similiar situations
    Cabrera and Janish?
    Hernandez and Hanigan?

    Phillips Mr. cleanup excellence?

    According to Phillips and Baker, Mr. Jocketty has not furnished a better option.
    Stubbs has started 10 games, Dickerson has started 7 (5 in CF). Dickerson is not exactly chained to the bench.

    Interesting (and admittedly meaningless) stat of the day: the Reds are 1-6 when Dickerson starts, 0-5 when he starts in CF.

  4. #33
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,928

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by edabbs44 View Post
    Would you be happy with Dickerson's horrible start to the season at the plate? Or would you be chanting "small sample size"?
    No, I'm not happy with Dickerson at the plate right now. Neither am I surprised at Stubbs at the plate. But you make my point here regarding both players.

    The difference between Dickerson and Stubbs in CF is probably negligible. I'll give the edge to Stubbs, but prior to his arrival in the system, Dickerson was the best defender in the OF. I still think they are likely 1-2 with no major drop off between them. Offensively, Stubbs is beyond horrible right now. So you live with CD's sub par production and the defense takes no hit, because subpar is much better than "Send him to AAA bad".

    At SS, it's different. Janish's defense is so much better than OCab's that no one can justify him defensively as a starter. Offensively, Cabrera has been almost but not quite as bad as Stubbs. SAMPLE SIZE ALERT... Janish hasn't been bad. Of course he's not as good as his current numbers we know that, but he might save 20 runs or more defensively. And frankly right now, this staff needs every plus glove it can get behind them.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  5. #34
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: Defense

    In my opinion, the situation in left and center are totally up in the air. Simply because any backup solution we may have...is struggling as well. I guess we could give Nix a start or two...but he's looked pretty overmatched at the plate too. If we go strictly defense for LF & CF, then it's Dickerson/Stubbs. I'd lean towards that, if for no other reason it might get Dusty to lean towards those two hitting 1-2 and bumping the SS out of that equation. But right now, NONE of the LF/CF options are hitting.

    In regards to short...this one's a no brainer as far as I'm concerned. Since the start of spring...all Janish has done at the plate is produce. I'm not deluded enough (not QUITE) to think that he's "turned the corner" or some such. But I AM convinced that he's going to hit enough to justify that glove. That glove solves SOOOOO many problems IMO. More inning ending DP's, fewer bloop singles & seeing-eye groundballs, more confidence for the pitchers, etc, etc. I just don't see what Cabrera brings to the table. I know he's had some "clutch" hits, but overall he's been pretty pedestrian at the plate and abysmal in the field. Time for a change...and quickly.

  6. #35
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,448

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNext44 View Post
    Thanks again for solid analysis, but just for clarification, it should be Votto/Cairo = Votto/Hernandez
    I don't believe that Cairo will get 25+ starts at 1B. In the FWIW department, Fangraphs has released its first run of UZR data, with some adjustments to account for park effects.

    This data is not predictive in any way, shape, or form (which is why I didn't post the UZR/150), but it can be considered an accurate description of what has happened to date. For the uninitiated, the currency here is runs.

    To my earlier, point, I don't think the performance we've gotten defensively so far is indicative of what we can generally expect moving forward.
    Code:
    Name		Pos	Inn	 UZR
    Joey Votto	1B	124	 2.1
    Jay Bruce	RF	127	 1.9
    Chris Dickerson	RF	  7	 0.7
    Paul Janish	SS	 10	 0.5
    Chris Dickerson	CF	 36	 0.5
    Brandon Phillip	2B	134	 0.3
    Juan Francisco	3B	  9	 0.0
    Miguel Cairo	3B	  8	 0.0
    Paul Janish	3B	 21	 0.0
    Laynce Nix	LF	 19	-0.1
    Miguel Cairo	1B	 10	-0.3
    Chris Dickerson	LF	 14	-0.4
    Scott Rolen	3B	 95	-1.8
    Orlando Cabrera	SS	124	-2.4
    Jonny Gomes	LF	101	-2.4
    Drew Stubbs	CF	 98	-4.2
    I must say, I'm very curious about the plays which Stubbs has botched -- they don't immediately come to mind. But fangraphs has him not making only 17 of 19 plays in zone and with a big -0.9 against him for his arm. OCab has made a ridiculously poor 72.5% plays in zone, 4th worst in baseball among SS with 100 innings. Sadly, he was 3rd worst in baseball last year at 76.3%. Janish, by contrast, was the best in MLB at 86.1%. Their UZRs last year were over 20 runs apart. I doubt Cabrera's bat makes up that difference...

    Data from here: http://www.fangraphs.com/winss.aspx?...n=2010&month=0
    Last edited by RedsManRick; 04-22-2010 at 03:43 PM.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  7. #36
    Waitin til next year bucksfan2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    12,383

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
    In regards to short...this one's a no brainer as far as I'm concerned. Since the start of spring...all Janish has done at the plate is produce. I'm not deluded enough (not QUITE) to think that he's "turned the corner" or some such. But I AM convinced that he's going to hit enough to justify that glove. That glove solves SOOOOO many problems IMO. More inning ending DP's, fewer bloop singles & seeing-eye groundballs, more confidence for the pitchers, etc, etc. I just don't see what Cabrera brings to the table. I know he's had some "clutch" hits, but overall he's been pretty pedestrian at the plate and abysmal in the field. Time for a change...and quickly.
    Im not going to put my faith in Janish and 11 at bats this season. He will get a chance to prove himself this season and after 100 at bats if he still is doing well then yea I can see the Reds giving him more playing time.

  8. #37
    High five!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    6,976

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
    Im not going to put my faith in Janish and 11 at bats this season. He will get a chance to prove himself this season and after 100 at bats if he still is doing well then yea I can see the Reds giving him more playing time.
    Well, at this rate, 100 ABs is about what he'll end up with come October.

  9. #38
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
    Im not going to put my faith in Janish and 11 at bats this season. He will get a chance to prove himself this season and after 100 at bats if he still is doing well then yea I can see the Reds giving him more playing time.
    Performance at the plate will vary throughout the year for ALL players (well, maybe not freakin' pooholes). Cabrera may very well bounce back a bit and hit somewhat better. Janish (and I'm looking at the 40 or so ST ab's too) may very well regress back to his poor hitting too. Both are certainly likely. But their skills with the gloves aren't going to change much. THAT'S where you've simply GOT to put Janish in there for starting. Cabrera's glove is killing us. It's just HORRIBLE. He can't jump to get balls above his head, he's got no lateral quickness at all, his range is simply abysmal, and his arm isn't anything to write home about. If it were any other position than CF or SS...I'd consider to let some of it slide if he were hitting well. But it IS shortstop...and he's not hitting well. Janish may hit or he may not...but he WILL field his position and help his teammates & pitchers with his D.

  10. #39
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,928

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
    Im not going to put my faith in Janish and 11 at bats this season. He will get a chance to prove himself this season and after 100 at bats if he still is doing well then yea I can see the Reds giving him more playing time.
    How many GB's past OCab would you allow. Faith is a funny thing. Enough of it can blind you to other things. OCab isn't hitting and his defense is bad. But he did win some hardware.

    Do you have faith that he's going to be a plus defender again?
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  11. #40
    Waitin til next year bucksfan2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    12,383

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by nate View Post
    Well, at this rate, 100 ABs is about what he'll end up with come October.
    Last year he got roughly 300 at bats and didn't run away with the job. This year he will get his playing time, maybe not as much as people want, but if he keeps hitting he will get his chance.

    The other night FSN showed a slow motion replay of Janish RBI hit in the 8th inning. I was shocked to see how little wrist action he has. He generates little power from his wrist action which may be the reason behind his lack of power development. After seeing his swing in slow motion I just don't think his offensive game will ever be up to snuff. The best I hope for out of Janish is to become a very good bat handler, someone who is difficult to strike out and knows how to take a walk.

  12. #41
    High five!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    6,976

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
    The other night FSN showed a slow motion replay of Janish RBI hit in the 8th inning. I was shocked to see how little wrist action he has. He generates little power from his wrist action which may be the reason behind his lack of power development. After seeing his swing in slow motion I just don't think his offensive game will ever be up to snuff. The best I hope for out of Janish is to become a very good bat handler, someone who is difficult to strike out and knows how to take a walk.
    That's what he is right now. His career K-rate (14.7%) is less than the MLB average (17.8%) and his BB-rate (8.9%) is a tick above average (8.8%).

    He is what he is. I think he's as valuable if not more so than O-Cab.

    Plus, he'd be one of the better relievers!


  13. #42
    Waitin til next year bucksfan2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    12,383

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by nate View Post

    Plus, he'd be one of the better relievers!

    I was looking up his stats and just had to chuckle at his pitching line. His ERA is in the 40's but he does have 2K's.

  14. #43
    Charlie Brown All-Star IslandRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    5,042

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    How many GB's past OCab would you allow. Faith is a funny thing. Enough of it can blind you to other things. OCab isn't hitting and his defense is bad. But he did win some hardware.

    Do you have faith that he's going to be a plus defender again?
    From what I've seen so far, I don't. Having said that, I was perfectly okay with bringing him in. Janish is what he is -- he's an excellent defender and he can't hit. Not good enough, in other words, and the Reds gave themselves a chance to do better. But if Cabrera isn't better, then yes, move Janish in. Given two shortstops of more-or-less equivalent total value, I take the superior defender because of the residual benefits to the pitching staff.
    Reading comprehension is not just an ability, it's a choice

  15. #44
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    38,000

    Re: Defense

    *Bump*

    I've been hard on Orlando Cabrera for his defense, but I have no problem giving credit where credit is due. Cabrera has made a couple nice plays in the last three games. The first was the relay throw to Hernandez to get Schumaker at the plate on Saturday night, and the other play was tonight when he threw out Alcides Escobar at the plate on a groundball from Ryan Braun. That was a very, very good play by Cabrera. I didn't think he had a chance to get him but he did.

    I still think his range is well below average, but he's made some nice plays in the last few days and I felt like I should point that out. I may criticize players sometimes but I also like to be fair and give them credit when they deserve it. I hope he continues to play well like he has lately.

  16. #45
    Member Captain Hook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    columbus,ohio
    Posts
    2,344

    Re: Defense

    Quote Originally Posted by OnBaseMachine View Post
    *Bump*

    I've been hard on Orlando Cabrera for his defense, but I have no problem giving credit where credit is due. Cabrera has made a couple nice plays in the last three games. The first was the relay throw to Hernandez to get Schumaker at the plate on Saturday night, and the other play was tonight when he threw out Alcides Escobar at the plate on a groundball from Ryan Braun. That was a very, very good play by Cabrera. I didn't think he had a chance to get him but he did.

    I still think his range is well below average, but he's made some nice plays in the last few days and I felt like I should point that out. I may criticize players sometimes but I also like to be fair and give them credit when they deserve it. I hope he continues to play well like he has lately.
    I have to second everything OBM says here.His defense was really bad early on but at least on the surface it appears to be improving.One poster mentioned that it was possible that as the season went on maybe the older Cabrera would loosen up a bit.Looks like that might end up being the case.There's reason to believe he'll continue to hit so I'm on board.

    I no longer indorse Janish for SS in 2010.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator