Turn Off Ads?
Page 22 of 33 FirstFirst ... 1218192021222324252632 ... LastLast
Results 316 to 330 of 481

Thread: Zach Stewart's progress

  1. #316
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,297

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by Homer Bailey View Post
    Not trying to add fuel to the debate, I just want to know if anyone knows the Reds updated record since the Rolen trade?
    Just worked it through a complex algo and I came up with a record of "pretty good".

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #317
    I'm gettin paper Homer Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    4,689

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Hm. I thought I remember seeing a week or two ago that the Reds were something like 44-22 since the trade. Maybe the stat I saw wasn't just their last 66 games or something, and not specifically since the Rolen trade.

    Thanks gentlemen.

  4. #318
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,297

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by Homer Bailey View Post
    Hm. I thought I remember seeing a week or two ago that the Reds were something like 44-22 since the trade. Maybe the stat I saw wasn't just their last 66 games or something, and not specifically since the Rolen trade.

    Thanks gentlemen.
    Probably since he got back from the DL last year

  5. #319
    Member medford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    2,083

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Perhaps the 44-22 mark is in games Rolen has played in, or started? Obviously he hasn't played every game, not even including DL stints, like the games @ Pittsburgh earlier when he had a minor injury and sat out a couple of losses.

  6. #320
    High five! nate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    6,976

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by medford View Post
    Perhaps the 44-22 mark is in games Rolen has played in, or started? Obviously he hasn't played every game, not even including DL stints, like the games @ Pittsburgh earlier when he had a minor injury and sat out a couple of losses.
    That's probably in games that he's played in. My number is the Reds total record since he joined the team.
    "Bring on Rod Stupid!"

  7. #321
    Titanic Struggles Caveat Emperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The 513
    Posts
    12,642

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by jojo View Post
    I think Jocketty talks about culture for the same reason Bavasi talks about culture-because they think it's really important. When it (culture) trumps true talent level in personnel decisions, it's a process that is fraught with peril.
    But that's kind of a strawman -- it isn't like Jocketty went out and paid Yonder Alonso to get a judy-hitting catcher with great leadership and intangibles. He paid a starting pitching prospect to get a guy who the baseball people told him could still play good defense (so far: true), had some mileage left with his bat (so far; true), and who he knew from personal experience had the ability to mentor his young players (Bruce, Votto, Stubbs, et. al.) by example.

    Culture might be the lead example cited by Jocketty, but the man isn't dumb: he acquired himself a damn good baseball player in addition to a good clubhouse guy.
    Championships Matter.
    23 Years and Counting...

  8. #322
    Five Tool Fool jojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    18,950

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by Caveat Emperor View Post
    But that's kind of a strawman -- it isn't like Jocketty went out and paid Yonder Alonso to get a judy-hitting catcher with great leadership and intangibles. He paid a starting pitching prospect to get a guy who the baseball people told him could still play good defense (so far: true), had some mileage left with his bat (so far; true), and who he knew from personal experience had the ability to mentor his young players (Bruce, Votto, Stubbs, et. al.) by example.

    Culture might be the lead example cited by Jocketty, but the man isn't dumb: he acquired himself a damn good baseball player in addition to a good clubhouse guy.
    I haven't argued that Jocketty targeted Rolen only because of his clubhouse presence though. I've contrasted the Rolen trade with the current Jr/Sweeney situation which was clearly jamming clubhouse presence into a roster position and with Bavasi who clearly habitually valued chemistry so much he conflated it with true talent.... That said to the extent that the Reds may have overpaid for Rolen, chemistry was likely explains the discrepancy between the "saber" value and the actual value.

    I think this basically tells us enough to get us 90% of the way to why the trade happened like it did. It probably also roughly quantifies how much monetary value Jocketty ascribes to chemistry (i.e. the discrepancy illustrated in this post: http://www.redszone.com/forums/showp...&postcount=253) though we don't know how much WAR he'd translate it's effect into (though he clearly thinks its important and thus has a significant impact) and we don't know how much faith the Reds truly had in Stewart's future.

    Here's what I'd argue is a reasonable view of the Reds' process on this trade (order does not imply importance):
    1) Rolen wanted a trade and it was a natural conversation for Toronto and the Reds to have
    2) money issues (EE, Rolen's salary=about $10M and Toronto rightly wanted to be compensated for the "relief" provided for a fair trade)
    3) a desire by Jocketty to upgrade the team on the field
    4) Jocketty assumed Rolen would provide leadership and he added that to Rolen's value (i.e. Jocketty thinks chemistry has a tangible effect on RS/RA and this effect is worth paying for)
    5) The Reds perhaps having enough doubts about Stewart to feel comfortable passing the risk on to Toronto

    Really through that prism, it's no wonder that Jocketty thought it was a nobrainer. The people who don't like the trade generally think the odds are pretty good that Stewart is going to be a good major league starting pitcher.

    As indicated by my contribution to the multiple threads on this subject, I don't have a problem with the Reds process on this one.

    I still cringe when a GM talks about chemistry and clubhouse presence though.

    Anyway, IMHO, a lot of the Stewart/Rolen "debate" in multiple threads has basically been recycling the two sides ingrained stances on the issue. I'd suggest the best way to move this discussion forward would be to focus on what value Jocketty actually places on chemistry (i.e. how much WAR he thinks it translates into for example and what he thinks is a proper monetary value to pay for it) and what the Reds actual true feelings were on Stewart's future (i.e. what probability they thought would be associated with his various potential outcomes). That's my two cents for what it's worth (I don't think 2 cents is actually worth two cents anymore is it?)....
    Last edited by jojo; 05-19-2010 at 03:25 PM.
    "This isnít stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner

  9. #323
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,558

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    I take the clubhouse comment to refer possibly to the other positive of the trade: moving EE off third.

  10. #324
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    10,133

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    I'd suggest the best way to move this discussion forward would be to focus on what value Jocketty actually places on chemistry (i.e. how much WAR he thinks it translates into for example) and what the Reds actual true feelings were on Stewart's future (i.e. what probability they thought would be associated with his various potential outcomes). That's my two cents for what it's worth (I don't think 2 cents is actually worth two cents anymore is it?)....
    I started this thread and I'm going to continue to "move the discussion forward" by posting Stewart's results on the field this year. That's far more interesting to me than trying to put a number (WAR) on an unquantifiable (chemistry) or unlock the Reds' thoughts on Zach Stewart's potential circa July 2009 (where would anyone here get that information?).

    So, as noted, Stewart had a good outing last night to drop his ERA in a Double AA starting rotation to 6.12.
    "Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini

  11. #325
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,558

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    I applaud your desire, lollipop, to get back on thread. One last comment: moving a 3b who cannot play the position is, for pitchers, not a matter of chemistry but sanity.

  12. #326
    Five Tool Fool jojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    18,950

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipopcurve View Post
    I started this thread and I'm going to continue to "move the discussion forward" by posting Stewart's results on the field this year. That's far more interesting to me than trying to put a number (WAR) on an unquantifiable (chemistry) or unlock the Reds' thoughts on Zach Stewart's potential circa July 2009 (where would anyone here get that information?).

    So, as noted, Stewart had a good outing last night to drop his ERA in a Double AA starting rotation to 6.12.
    You're moving the discussion forward by restating posts #273 and #295?

    Stewart's progress really doesn't move the discussion forward though.
    "This isnít stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner

  13. #327
    I'm gettin paper Homer Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    4,689

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Fay answered for me....

    26-11 last year with Rolen in the lineup, and 23-16 (didn't calculate lineup with or without him). 49-27 with Rolen. Not saying that he is directly responsible for the uptick in wins, but man, that is impressive.

  14. #328
    Vavasor TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Amarillo, TX
    Posts
    13,447

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by Homer Bailey View Post
    Not trying to add fuel to the debate, I just want to know if anyone knows the Reds updated record since the Rolen trade?
    If you go by Aug 1, the Blue Jays are 60-50.

    Which means nothing for both teams.
    Suck it up cupcake.

  15. #329
    Member paulrichjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Savannah, TN
    Posts
    2,900

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    If you go by Aug 1, the Blue Jays are 60-50.

    Which means nothing for both teams.
    Which says that EdE has been a great pickup for them?
    Tim McCarver: Baseball Quotes
    I remember one time going out to the mound to talk with Bob Gibson. He told me to get back behind the batter, that the only thing I knew about pitching was that it was hard to hit.

  16. #330
    Viva la Rolen kaldaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    8,035

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    I just don't think it is possible to evaluate a trade without considering any of the results of a trade. Some in here staked their case the day of the trade and have not been flexible at all in their position.

    Some What ifs...(which we will never know)

    1) What if the Reds FO accurately scouted Stewart to be not as good as many projected, making him easily expendable

    2) What if the Reds FO thought Cincy could truly compete in 2010.

    3) What if in real life there was no real/better trade return for Zach Stewart

    I'm just saying, who knows...the Reds FO could have perhaps legitimately done their homework on this one...we don't know the behind the scenes details.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25