Turn Off Ads?
Page 25 of 33 FirstFirst ... 15212223242526272829 ... LastLast
Results 361 to 375 of 481

Thread: Zach Stewart's progress

  1. #361
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,928

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Honestly, to be fair you have to look at injury and performance. From the performance history standpoint the edge goes to Rolen to continue posting his current numbers for the rest of the year. But he has an injury history that is chronic. His back isn't magically better at age 35 just because he's a Red.

    In EE's favor is youth and an interesting upward trend of his numbers. No one thinks his glove is ever going to be adequate, but the minute he was declared healthy, he was put back in the starting lineup and at 3B.

    EE may be on a ridiculous hot streak right now, but he's got 3 fewer HR's than Rolen in 80 fewer AB's. He's 7 for his last 19, with 6 of those being HR's. That's an amazing week for any player. For a lot of us, EE's bat was never the problem.

    So, if Stewarts early struggles were just that, struggles, (a temporary thing) and EE is healthy, then I'd say Toronto got exactly what they wanted out of the trade.
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #362
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,194

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by jojo View Post
    I'm struggling to understand your position given your last few posts. Are you arguing that sample size really isn't important or are you arguing that it doesn't matter if stats are used correctly during a discussion?
    methinks he's just arguing

  4. #363
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,419

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by jojo View Post
    I'm struggling to understand your position given your last few posts. Are you arguing that sample size really isn't important or are you arguing that it doesn't matter if stats are used correctly during a discussion?
    Im saying everyone was all about the sample size when it fit their argument. Now it doesn't matter. My argument is that some people want to dictate what sample size we are allowed to use.

  5. #364
    Five Tool Fool jojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,390

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by GIDP View Post
    Im saying everyone was all about the sample size when it fit their argument. Now it doesn't matter. My argument is that some people want to dictate what sample size we are allowed to use.
    That's really not a fair (i.e. accurate) characterization of the position held by the "pro-trade" crowd.

    BTW, you won't find a post by me that fits the above narrative that the appropriate sample size arbitrarily depends upon whether the results over that period fits the point one wants to make. I am guilty of arguing that 10 PAs isn't sufficient though...
    "This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner

  6. #365
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,419

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by jojo View Post
    That's really not a fair (i.e. accurate) characterization of the position held by the "pro-trade" crowd.

    BTW, you won't find a post by me that fits the above narrative that the appropriate sample size arbitrarily depends upon whether the results over that period fits the point one wants to make. I am guilty of arguing that 10 PAs isn't sufficient though...
    No dont get me wrong im just saying a lot of people were loving to cite Stewarts struggle then ignore his 2009 season or dismissed it as much as they could, then cite Rolens surprising power, but then ignore Edwins bat.

    Its just very inconsistent, and thats what I meant by my original post of "I got the impression that it did."

  7. #366
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    12,606

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by GIDP View Post
    No dont get me wrong im just saying a lot of people were loving to cite Stewarts struggle then ignore his 2009 season or dismissed it as much as they could, then cite Rolens surprising power, but then ignore Edwins bat.
    So true.

    So true.

  8. #367
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,059

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    I just noticed something odd, Edwin has been dropped to 9th in the batting order tonight after being on fire his last 3 games. I know that is unrelated but thought it was worth a mention.

  9. #368
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    12,606

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by Orenda View Post
    I just noticed something odd, Edwin has been dropped to 9th in the batting order tonight after being on fire his last 3 games. I know that is unrelated but thought it was worth a mention.
    The MLB network rated Toronto as one of the Top-8 teams in Baseball right now. The REDS didn't make the Top-9.

  10. #369
    Cruisin' for trouble
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    3,309

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingspoint View Post
    The MLB network rated Toronto as one of the Top-8 teams in Baseball right now. The REDS didn't make the Top-9.
    HBT has the Reds 6th (Cards 5th) and Toronto not in the top 10.

    Neither means anything.

  11. #370
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,194

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by GoReds View Post
    HBT has the Reds 6th (Cards 5th) and Toronto not in the top 10.

    Neither means anything.
    Yep, I have a list too.. it lists coffee on top

  12. #371
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,227

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    people were loving to cite Stewarts struggle then ignore his 2009 season or dismissed it as much as they could
    I started the thread and called it "Zach Stewart's progress" for a reason -- it's about how Stewart is doing in the here and now, not about last year.

  13. #372
    Member Sea Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    26,470

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    So, if Stewarts early struggles were just that, struggles, (a temporary thing) and EE is healthy, then I'd say Toronto got exactly what they wanted out of the trade.
    If that's the way it works out then I'd say it'll be one of those deals that works out well for both teams

  14. #373
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,227

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    If that's the way it works out then I'd say it'll be one of those deals that works out well for both teams
    Exactly. The way they draw it up.

  15. #374
    Member Kingspoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    All around
    Posts
    12,606

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipopcurve View Post
    I started the thread and called it "Zach Stewart's progress" for a reason -- it's about how Stewart is doing in the here and now, not about last year.

    It's been good his last two starts. Nice to see him show some progress.

  16. #375
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,227

    Re: Zach Stewart's progress

    Stewart falters again in start #9 at AA New Hampshire:

    5 IP, 8 H, 5 ER, 4 BB, 6 K (no HRs)

    ERA now at 6.02 on the year.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator