Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: which prospects would you like to keep?

  1. #1
    Brett William Moore Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Crescent Springs KY
    Posts
    3,572

    which prospects would you like to keep?

    In order to get a true impact player such as a TOR starter or say Stephen Drew to play SS the Reds are going to have to trade something of value. As much as we would all love to trade Lecure & Dorn for Cliff Lee a deal like that would never happen. Looking at the Reds team I see four young players who could be a centerpiece of a big trade.

    1. Yonder Alonso. seems that despite his not exactly destroying minor league pitching (possibly due to the hamate fracture) he is desired by other clubs. I've heard his name in the Lee rumors. IMO he is 100% tradable due to being blocked by Votto & having only dabbled in playing LF this year. He would seem to be the one big trade chip the team wouldn't miss.

    2. Devin Mesoraco. Two words: sell high. Not that he couldn't someday be a fine major league catcher. Its that his value is higher now than its even been. Try to pawn off Todd Frazier in a deal for a TOR starter & the other team will wrinkle their nose due to his poor 2010 (so far). Yet the same team that wouldn't have even thought of Mesoraco 3 months ago is now drooling over him.

    3. Chris Heisey or Drew Stubbs. while the team could play Stubbs in CF & Heisey in LF i believe the team would be better off by cashing in the trade value of a young centerfielder rather than playing Heisey in LF. LF & 1B have to be the easiest positions to find a competent player. even if Gomes reverts to being a platoon bat it shouldn't be that hard to find a lefty bat to play LF vs a RHP. Heck, we may even have one in house (Francisco, Dorn or even Dickerson)

    4. Travis Wood. He is the one guy of the four that I would really like to keep. The old "you can never have enough pitching" addage certainly could apply to the Reds with Volquez (recovering from injury), Bailey (injured), Leake (young), Arroyo (may not be back for 2011) & Chapman (unproven). Cueto has been good so far but has put up an ERA+ of 92 & 97 in his two full seasons. The only way I would deal Wood is in a deal for a TOR arm that will be here past 2010 (say Haren, Greinke, Oswalt, etc). I would not include him in deal for Cliff Lee.

    I would be shocked if Chapman was dealt. It could happen but I would be very suprised. I have heard Baliey's name mentioned as a trade chip but I can't see a team trading for a guy on the DL. After Alonso, Mes, Heisey/Stubbs & Wood the other prospects we have don't seem to have the value needed to make the centerpiece of a big trade. If anyone thinks someone else in the system could bring us back a big name please throw his name in the hat.

    So, which top prospects would you be OK with trading in a deal for a star player & which prospects do you want to keep?
    .

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    8,788

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    The 3 I'd most like to keep (or would expect a king's ransom in exchange for) would be Chapman, Y. Rodriguez and Mesoraco. I would trade anyone else in the right deal. I might be a little bit picky about Hamilton too, but I'm not sure anyone would be heavily coveting him at the moment anyway.

    I just hope if Alonso is traded, the Reds aren't "selling low" because of the injury he's recovering from.

  4. #3
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,581

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    Keep for sure:
    Chapman

    Would hate to deal (and not for a rental):

    Y-Rod
    Mesoraco
    Cozart
    Hamilton
    Joseph

    Prime Chips:

    Alonso
    Heisey/Stubbs (Only one. If one is dealt the other becomes not available)
    Wood
    Francisco
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS

  5. #4
    Resident PED Expert nemesis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Centerville, Ohio
    Posts
    1,401

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    Keep:

    Wood

    Mez

    Chapman

    Yorman

    in that order.

    Would like to Keep:

    Heisey
    Cozart
    Joseph
    Hamilton
    Duran
    Arias

    Move away:

    Bailey
    Alonso
    Francisco
    Soto
    Dorn
    Massett
    Fisher
    Sutton
    Boxberger
    Valiquette
    Johnson
    Frazier
    Valakia
    Klinker
    Maloney
    LeCure
    Ondrusek
    DRH
    Smith
    Del Rosario
    Henry
    Sappelt
    Carroll
    Fairel
    Sulbaran
    Gregorious
    H Rodriguez
    Krebs
    Thompson
    Hotchkiss
    Coddington
    Fellhauer
    Garton
    Tuttle

    Tell me that if you went to Seattle and said we will take Lee and give you Alonso, Dorn, Francisco, Maloney and Heisey they don't pull that trigger.

    Alonso at 1B over a .194 hitting Kotchman, Dorn at DH over a .212 hitting Bradley, Francisco at 3B over a .589 OPSing Lopez, Maloney just to fill the rotation spot Lee vacated, Heisey in LF over a .209 hitting Saunders and DRH who probably has ran his course in the NL. No way they wouldn't take that over Ramos from Minnesota.

    Sure it depletes the AAA farm team, but, it keeps Frazier and puts him back in LF for good. Keeps Wood for next year after Lee is gone ditto for Bailey and keeps Mez for September 2011 and April 2012. It fits.
    If you can't be a good example... then you'll just have to be a horrible warning...

    Nothing tastes as good as being fit feels...

  6. #5
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,581

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    I think this board way over-values Wood. If the Reds kept them all and made zero moves, I still don't see him as one of the the top 5 starters for 2011 even if the Reds let Harang and Arroyo walk and add no one.

    Volquez
    Cueto
    Chapman
    Leake
    Bailey

    Consider that they probably add a vet of some type to eat innings (or hopefully more) which would push Wood to 7th on the depth chart and guys like Klinker and whoever stays of Maloney and Lecure add depth behind him and the team can afford to deal Wood IMO. He's a prime chip and usually a young ML ready starter is a mandatory piece to add to get a TOR arm. I'd prefer a guy that will be around in 2011 as well and I'm not high on Haren, but I just don't understand why Oswalt seems to be so out of the question. If the Reds offered Wood, Alonso and Heisey, Oswalt would not only be a Red for 2010 and 2011, but the Astros would cover a lot of the cash IMO.
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS

  7. #6
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    8,770

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    mth, I hope the Reds value Wood about where the board does. Go and revisit his minor league numbers. He's on a trajectory that screams projectible major-league #3 pitcher for years and years. At the least. Left-handers with his plus change, cutter and command don't come along all that often. And he's just 23.

    Heresy here, but I like his future more than Chapman's. There, I said it. Then again, I have a thing for strike throwers and players with command. I think Wood is in the process of becoming such a pitcher...and I hope that Chapman is, but I don't know it at this juncture. And I don't think the Reds can either.

    I would NOT deal, for a rental:

    Wood
    Mes
    Chapman
    Yorman Rodriguez
    Junior Arias
    Billy Hamilton

    For a rental like Lee?

    Alonso and anyone else not on the above list.

    For a piece that would be here as a rotation anchor who is youngish and under a reasonable contract? In that case, none would be untouchable.

    My itchiness is with dealing the first set of guys on my list for someone who will only be here for two months. And, no, I am not inclined to think differently because they get two #1s for losing Lee.

    If they could deal for Lee AND sign him? Fine, send from the first list. But for a rental? No.

    I also project the starting rotation a lot differently than you in 2011, mth. My thoughts at this juncture:

    Volquez
    Cueto
    Vet arm of some type
    Wood
    Leake

    Chapman in long relief until the team is sure that he can throw strikes on a regular basis. And I don't see that happening by the time the team breaks camp next year.

    I don't think Bailey is a long-term solution for this team, and would like to see him gain a modicum of health and then dealt this off-season.
    Last edited by membengal; 07-04-2010 at 07:30 AM.

  8. #7
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,581

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    Maybe I'm biased but I like bigger guys with TOR stuff. I'm not high on short frail looking guys. Wood is 5-11 and only 165. I just don't see him as a guy holding up as a starter. He's had a good year and a half and his value is high. Now is the time to cash in.

    Bailey and Chapman are both 6-4 and throw harder. Bailey is hurting this year (IMO from the big inning jump from 2008 to 2009) but is throwing again so hopefully there is no long term damage. Assuming the Reds add a vet for 2011, he and Chapman may be vying for one spot.

    Wood can be a decent back end starter who I have doubts about being able to go more than 170 innings year in and year out. I don't see him being as high as a number 3 in a rotation unless its a train wreck like the Reds from the early 2000s. Bailey and Chapman both have TOR potential and I'd give them every opportunity to reach it.
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS

  9. #8
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    8,770

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    I def can see it being a bias as to type, then. I am okay with the shorter pitchers, but then again, I am only 5'9" myself and maybe I am sympathetic to my own...

    I have long supported the idea of Bailey and Bailey himself. But I am not willing to cast aside a guy like Wood in the hope that Bailey someday has the lights come on. It may not happen for him here.

    I am not saying throw Chapman away, just that I don't think he is ready to be a TOR guy yet. And another year in long relief grooming to start being that guy in 2012 lets them play my ideal 2011 rotation and see if they can all stay healthy.

    If they can, then you can deal a Leake or a Wood at that point to make room for Chapman at the end of 2011 if Chapman is ready then. But I don't want Wood packing until we know more about Chapman. I LOVE the idea of Chapman, as much as I loved the idea of Bailey, but I don't want eggs in that basket prematurely.

    And the Reds can figure on 175 or so innings from Wood in 2011 at, in the least in my opinion, a league average ERA. If not a pinch better.

    ETA: Also, Wood was tossing it up there consistently at 92 in his debut, and touched 94 once. He's not Chapman, but if he can sit between 90 and 92 on the gun with his fastball, my understanding is that is above average velocity for a lefty starter in the big leagues...

    At what Wood will cost, that's not something I would personally toss aside for a rental.
    Last edited by membengal; 07-04-2010 at 07:57 AM.

  10. #9
    Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy Eric_the_Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    2,171

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    I would trade ANY prospect that nets the Reds a better established player.

    I would keep ANY prospect that doesn't.

    You can't get too attached to any prospect. If you can flip a couple of them to upgrade the 25 man roster, you do it, end of story. I don't care how many championships the organization wins in the minors, I want a World Series.

    Plus, fans tend to tremendously overvalue their own club's prospects/players. Exhibit A: Stewart is not going to win the AL Cy Young and EdE is no longer a Blue Jay.

    The reality is, most don't pan out or reach their potential. To me, prospects are like lottery scratch-off tickets: they may be worth something, very few of those are worth a lot, but most are generally worthless.

  11. #10
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,581

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    I really don't like Rental players either and would really like to see Oswalt as the target. He'd be back in 2011 and the dollars committed should make him less costly in terms of talent. If the Reds go big on talent (say Alonso, Heisey and Wood), then the Astros would probably pay quite a bit of the remaining 2010 salary and some of 2011 as well. If the Astros balk at paying the bucks, I'd take Wood and Heisey off the table and happily deal Alonso and lesser pieces (say Maloney and Wlad or something).
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS

  12. #11
    Charlie Brown All-Star IslandRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    4,807

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    Maybe I'm biased but I like bigger guys with TOR stuff. I'm not high on short frail looking guys. Wood is 5-11 and only 165. I just don't see him as a guy holding up as a starter. He's had a good year and a half and his value is high. Now is the time to cash in.

    Bailey and Chapman are both 6-4 and throw harder. Bailey is hurting this year (IMO from the big inning jump from 2008 to 2009) but is throwing again so hopefully there is no long term damage. Assuming the Reds add a vet for 2011, he and Chapman may be vying for one spot.

    Wood can be a decent back end starter who I have doubts about being able to go more than 170 innings year in and year out. I don't see him being as high as a number 3 in a rotation unless its a train wreck like the Reds from the early 2000s. Bailey and Chapman both have TOR potential and I'd give them every opportunity to reach it.
    Conversely, you can make an argument that because we have depth, and because we're in a contending window now, we can't afford and don't need to let Bailey flop around out there indefinitely trying to find consistency.

    As for Travis Wood, he's a good problem to have. We'd love to keep him, some other team might love him enough to give us something even better.
    Not all who wander are lost

  13. #12
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    8,770

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric_the_Red View Post
    I would trade ANY prospect that nets the Reds a better established player.

    I would keep ANY prospect that doesn't.

    You can't get too attached to any prospect. If you can flip a couple of them to upgrade the 25 man roster, you do it, end of story. I don't care how many championships the organization wins in the minors, I want a World Series.

    Plus, fans tend to tremendously overvalue their own club's prospects/players. Exhibit A: Stewart is not going to win the AL Cy Young and EdE is no longer a Blue Jay.

    The reality is, most don't pan out or reach their potential. To me, prospects are like lottery scratch-off tickets: they may be worth something, very few of those are worth a lot, but most are generally worthless.

    If that's directed at me, and since it follows my post, it may be, I am trying NOT to "overvalue" our own prospects. Also, the counter to overvaluing your own prospects is undervaluing them. Prospects are not trash. Some are projectible. And cost-effective. For a budget-minded team like Cincy, that is not something that can be ignored.

    I AM noting that I don't want to let loose the ones from my list for a rental.

    There's a difference between getting Rolen and extending him and getting Lee, say, for two and a half months, and then watching him walk.
    Last edited by membengal; 07-04-2010 at 09:30 AM.

  14. #13
    Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy Eric_the_Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    2,171

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    Quote Originally Posted by membengal View Post
    If that's directed at me, and since it follows my post, it may be, I am trying NOT to "overvalue" our own prospects. Also, the counter to overvaluing your own prospects is undervaluing them. Prospects are not trash. Some are projectible. And cost-effective. For a budget-minded team like Cincy, that is not something that can be ignored.

    I AM noting that I don't want to let loose the ones from my list for a rental.

    There's a difference between getting Rolen and extending him and getting Lee, say, for two and a half months, and then watching him walk.
    My post wasn't directed at you per se, just anyone who overvalues prospects (or, more accurately, anyone who overvalues their projections). I would argue that prospects are no more projectable than the weather. There is data to support projections, but in the end, it is just a guess.

    What did Brandon Wood project to be a couple years ago? Did Brien Taylor ever reach his potential? History is littered with "can't miss" prospects that missed badly, and even more that only became replacement level players.

    To me, prospects are currency used to improve your team. Some help the club by being dealt for better pieces, and some help by working their way through the minors. IMO, the first option is the safer route.

    Take a look at the Red Sox dealing Jeff Bagwell to the Astros for Larry Anderson. Sure, the trade looks awful now. But suppose the move worked and Boston won the World Series that year. I doubt you'd find any BoSox fan that cared what Bagwell did the rest of his career.

  15. #14
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    8,770

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    So just because Brien Taylor didn't pan out, all prospects are trash? On top of that, where did I say the prospects that I would not deal for a rental are "can't miss". Of course prospects can miss. They often do. Course, Lee could get here and blow an elbow one start later. No guarantees, right?

    It's a matter of balancing risk and reward. And, economics of franchises matter. The Reds are not in a position as a franchise to burn legit prospects on rentals who they cannot keep. Money is not limitless.

    Tell me they can get Lee and keep him, then, fine, send them whatever.

    Tell me they are getting Lee for guys like Wood who can be cost-effective solutions for this team and that Lee will be gone next year?

    Not fine.

    And that's NOT over-valuing prospects. That is having an idea about the value of prospects who are major league ready to a franchise like Cincy.
    Last edited by membengal; 07-04-2010 at 09:54 AM.

  16. #15
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,581

    Re: which prospects would you like to keep?

    Quote Originally Posted by IslandRed View Post
    Conversely, you can make an argument that because we have depth, and because we're in a contending window now, we can't afford and don't need to let Bailey flop around out there indefinitely trying to find consistency.

    As for Travis Wood, he's a good problem to have. We'd love to keep him, some other team might love him enough to give us something even better.
    Or you could throw him in the 5 spot knowing you have alternatives if he busts completely. IMO Chapman and Bailey are both better bets than Wood long term. Wood might be better for the next 4 months, but if its the next 4 months we're worried about, then dealing him for a TOR arm should be something we're all in favor of.

    Heck, I still think Zach Stewart is a better bet than Wood. Wood is a cut above Maloney and Lecure, but he's not a guy who couldn't be replaced. He's a number 4 or 5 IMO if he pans out.
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25