Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 51

Thread: Trade proposal from ESPN

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Wheelersburg, Ohio
    Posts
    930

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    Quote Originally Posted by brm7675 View Post
    Heisey is misused by our manager, you DON"T give up grade A quality players for bullpen help, well you do if you are an idiot. Second whom is our SS of the future? Bullpen arms are a dime a dozen, what's to say Springer and Izzy can't do what these guys would do and guess what...IT'S NOT COSTING US ANYTHING.
    Springer and Izzy can do the job and I hope they do, believe me I hope they do. But, if they don't the Reds are setting themselves up for criticism, probably from guys like you. Especially if the Cardinals get Oswalt.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,419

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    Quote Originally Posted by markymark69 View Post
    Trade proposal from ESPN - also listed on Lance McAllister's blog.

    5 trades that need to happen
    ESPN
    2. The Cincinnati Reds shore up their bullpen by trading SS Zack Cozart to the Houston Astros for RHP Matt Lindstrom, and acquire RHP Michael Wuertz from the Oakland Athletics in exchange for OF Chris Heisey and LHP Donnie Joseph.
    Cozart is the only Reds SS in the system close to the major leagues. I would have a really hard time getting behind a trade of Cozart.

    Wuertz for Heisey and Joesph? Thats just silly to suggest.

  4. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,419

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    Quote Originally Posted by mrherd05 View Post
    Cozart plays every day in the minors....Heisey bats four times a week....yes, you trade those types of players for bullpen help to help get to something this organization has not been to in 15 years.
    Every player in the majors has "played every day in the minors" at some point.

  5. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Wheelersburg, Ohio
    Posts
    930

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    Quote Originally Posted by brm7675 View Post
    A) Gomes will not be with the Reds next season
    B) You can't believe Dickerson is anywhere near the talent of Heisey
    C) Janish will never be a starter, Dusty hates him, Frazier is our replacement at second when they deal Phillips. I see Valaika getting moved to third to replace Rolen next season at some point.
    Possibly with Gomes. Dickerson has received more of a shot than Heisey has , injuries however may prove to be his downfall and you may be right on shortstop, but all three can play shortstop if it comes to that.

  6. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Umm...Bama
    Posts
    764

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    I think adding Lindstrom would be nice, but Cozart is 24 or 25 and from all indications will be looking at a lot of playing time in Cincinnati next season, possibly the every-day shortstop. I don't know if I'd move him for a guy who is basically going to be a set-up man for at least the next year and a half. As long as Cordero is here, I don't see anyone else closing. I'd love to add Lindstrom to close because, while he's not much of an upgrade over Cordero, he's much cheaper and could get the job done.

    The biggest problem with improving our bullpen right now is Cordero's ridiculous contract. And it's not going anywhere any time soon. What idiot GM made that deal, by the way?

  7. #21
    The Franchise sivman17's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Akron, OH
    Posts
    736

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    Quote Originally Posted by GIDP View Post
    Every player in the majors has "played every day in the minors" at some point.
    Not Leake

  8. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,419

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    Quote Originally Posted by sivman17 View Post
    Not Leake
    Gottem!

  9. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    8,136

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    Heisey is by far our best pinch hitter, that is a very valuable piece to the team THIS season, especially for a playoff charge.

  10. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    52

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    I'm not too familiar with all minor league prospects(kind of a n00b I guess), but Lindstrom could help the team in my opinion.

  11. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,666

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    Quote Originally Posted by Texas Pete View Post
    I'm not too familiar with all minor league prospects(kind of a n00b I guess), but Lindstrom could help the team in my opinion.

    I don't anyone is saying he couldn't, but you don't trade good young talent for bullpen arms, it's just not worth it.

  12. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    584

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    Quote Originally Posted by brm7675 View Post
    A) Gomes will not be with the Reds next season
    B) You can't believe Dickerson is anywhere near the talent of Heisey
    C) Janish will never be a starter, Dusty hates him, Frazier is our replacement at second when they deal Phillips. I see Valaika getting moved to third to replace Rolen next season at some point.
    Why won't Gomes be here next year? I thought he was under contract for next year as well for a relatively low price.

  13. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    3,072

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    I'd do Heisey or Cozart for Lindstrom no problem. I'd do it for that old Marmol rumor too. Not Wuertz though.

    This team needs another A+ player in each of the three key spots. Bullpen, rotation, and lineup. Now the bullpen could probably be easily dealt with by dealing a B prospect like one of those trades above. But the team really hurt itself by missing out on Cliff Lee. They still need a player of equal caliber to him for the rotation. And probably another player just a notch below that caliber for the everyday lineup.

    We might make it to the playoffs, but without those additions, we would be one and done in the NLDS facing another teams shutdown players that we don't have.

  14. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,666

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    Quote Originally Posted by kfm View Post
    Why won't Gomes be here next year? I thought he was under contract for next year as well for a relatively low price.
    i believe he signed a 1 year deal and if he is here it is with a team option and with Heisey here, there is no reason to keep him.

  15. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,666

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    Quote Originally Posted by TC81190 View Post
    We might make it to the playoffs, but without those additions, we would be one and done in the NLDS facing another teams shutdown players that we don't have.
    I would rather have this and not trade away any young talent.

  16. #30
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: Trade proposal from ESPN

    I've said it before and I'll say it again. I don't want to make any trades unless we acquire the cream of the crop at some position, namely an ace starting pitcher or superior bullpen help.

    Trading away our future for average players doesn't get me excited. We already have a bunch of average players with a few studs mixed in..........that's why we're looking to bolster certain areas.

    If we're not going to get back something ALOT BETTER, I hope we pass.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator