According to foxsports.. Who could it be?
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/W...waivers-080510
According to foxsports.. Who could it be?
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/W...waivers-080510
Maybe we did and we can offer them Micah Owings. :P
San Diego? They've got priority to us in the waiver order. Maybe they're looking to replace Will Venable. They've already tried to get better in the outfield by adding Ryan Ludwick.
I sure hope it's not us.
Isn't the order worst to first record wise?And I think(could be wrong probably am ) If its a NL player AL picks first and vice versa.
The Hunt for a Reds October.
I would like him in LF if Dusty would use him correctly.
Ultimately he would bat him 6th or something completely wasting in OBP and then he would play Gomes and Dunn in the same outfield totally ruining any type of production you would get by making that move.
Yeah, yer right. I was reading the rules wrong. Waiver priority only for the first month of the season is based on last year's record. After that, it's the current season's record.
Why what? Why do I not want Dunn? Because he strikes out too much, doesn't hit with runners in scoring position, plays a terrible outfield, etc. Every complaint you've ever heard about Adam Dunn I agree with.Originally Posted by brm7675
We don't need no big donkey. We need a stallion!
The Reds are not going to bring Adam Dunn back here. They did get rid of him because of what he did between the line it was in the clubhouse that Dunn fell out of favor with this team.
Please show me one piece of evidence that Dunn was a problem in the clubhouse. According to his Nationals teammates he is a leader.
"It would difficult," Stammen said. "The biggest thing, I think, would be in the clubhouse. He's such a resounding presence. He's not rah-rah, but he's a leader. We look up to him. We love having him on the team. Hopefully he'll be here for years to come."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...080500117.html
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |