Turn Off Ads?
Page 19 of 25 FirstFirst ... 9151617181920212223 ... LastLast
Results 271 to 285 of 363

Thread: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

  1. #271
    Retro-Gamer Krawhitham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,729

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    Two well hit balls in a row



    PLEASE Bruce go deep

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #272
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    30

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    Quote Originally Posted by BurgervilleBuck View Post
    Razor!
    Do you knwo what the chances are of the Reds getting two hits in a row?

  4. #273
    Retro-Gamer Krawhitham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,729

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    Quote Originally Posted by BurgervilleBuck View Post
    On the plus side, this is probably Gomes' last game as a Red.
    I would not bet on that

  5. #274
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Nothern Kentucky
    Posts
    283

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    PLEASE Bruce, don't try to force yourself into being a hero.

  6. #275
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    655

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    that was our chance

  7. #276
    Retro-Gamer Krawhitham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,729

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    3 well hit balls and nothing to show for it

    Maybe next inning

  8. #277
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    30

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    Every hard ball we hit is always right at them. Much like the Cardinals games this year, we just don't get any luck and the other team gets it.

  9. #278
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    155

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    2 hits in a row? What's that?

  10. #279
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    81

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    At least Jim Day won't have to get a fauxhawk.
    If winning the division was easy, the Pirates would do it.
    Natty Redlocks

  11. #280
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,197

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    swept 3 straight games and two of them are shutouts....simply embarrasing

  12. #281
    Retro-Gamer Krawhitham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,729

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    Quote Originally Posted by BUTLER REDSFAN View Post
    swept 3 straight games and two of them are shutouts....simply embarrasing
    6 more outs

  13. #282
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    30

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    I wish Morgan could still suit up and play the rest of this game.

  14. #283
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Nothern Kentucky
    Posts
    283

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    Anybody noticed that every pitcher that comes in for the Reds in this series is "the hard-throwing ____________?" It's fine that the TBS announcers don't know anything about the Reds, but couldn't they have at least gotten a better variety of words to mix around?

  15. #284
    * Bat Votto Second * goreds2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    OH H - EYE OH
    Posts
    2,678

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    Quote Originally Posted by BUTLER REDSFAN View Post
    swept 3 straight games and two of them are shutouts....simply embarrasing
    Have you seen the Reds in the late inning this year?
    * Attended the 1990 and 2010 Reds Division clinchers *

    Watched the 2012 Clincher on FOX.
    Proud owner of a 1990 Dodge Class B Motorhome: A chick magnet!
    GO STEELERS
    www.tracyjonesonline.com
    Great YOUTUBE videos.

  16. #285
    Retro-Gamer Krawhitham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,729

    Re: 10-10-10 Phillies @ Reds (NLDS Game 3)

    Quote Originally Posted by KYRedLeg View Post
    Anybody noticed that every pitcher that comes in for the Reds in this series is "the hard-throwing ____________?" It's fine that the TBS announcers don't know anything about the Reds, but couldn't they have at least gotten a better variety of words to mix around?
    everybody has hit 96 today some how, the gun must be broke


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25