Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Northeast KY
    Posts
    873

    Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    If I were a Phillies fan I would be sick looking at the World Series and seeing Cliff Lee in it and not me. I know the Phillies offense went silent this series, but I still think they would have would this series had they had Cliff Lee. The aging Roy Oswalt is just not the same as having Lee in there.

    I must say though, I was at the playoff game in Cincinnati and I was glad to see the Phillies fans get the same feeling I got a couple of weeks ago with the other team celebrating victory on their home field. Its nice to see someone different in the World Series and I must say I really like this Giants team. They got cool character and frikin Brian Wilson is the man at closer. They are just as young as us and didn't get rattled by the Phillies like we did. They showed much better composure at the plate and on the mound. Maybe we can take some tips from them next year.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member Knightro28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    141

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    Have to disagree with you. Had the Phillies kept Lee, then they don't go out and get Halladay. Some would say they could have kept both, but I don't think so.

    Regardless of their rotation, their bats cost them.

    Many have used this argument with the Reds. "it doesn't matter if Volquez was the right or wrong decision, the Reds still didn't score in Game 1" et al...

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Northeast KY
    Posts
    873

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    they could have had Lee and Halliday both this season.. I'm saying keep Halliday and Lee

  5. #4
    Member Knightro28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    141

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    Quote Originally Posted by arkimadee View Post
    they could have had Lee and Halliday both this season.. I'm saying keep Halliday and Lee
    I guess my understanding of the whole Halladay / Lee double trade was that the Phillies were only capable of having one (for whatever reason, financial, probably), and so they chose Halladay because he was willing to extend his contract. I never thought keeping both was possible, but, I very well could be dead wrong

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Northeast KY
    Posts
    873

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    They traded Lee after they got Halladay. They could have kept Lee for just this season. Instead they decided to trade him to Seattle for prospects because they knew next year they couldn't afford both.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    303

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    They could have had Lee & Halladay. They didn't need to sign Blanton and give such a crazy contract to Howard. After these playoffs that Howard contract looks very ugly. Possibly the worst playoff performance by an "all-star" that I can remember.

  8. #7
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    10,071

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    The Phillies could not afford both Lee and Halladay. Their budget went from $113M in 2009 to $138M in 2010. That's a 20%, $25M jump. There is no way they could afford another $15M on top of that. I would imagine that the $138M payroll has them losing money this year, and is paid for by profits from years past.

    They chose Halladay over Lee, because Lee didn't want to sign long term with them. He turned down all their offers, so they moved to Halladay. Lee might technically been traded after Halladay was acquired, but that was all part of the same plan.
    "Man, the pitch looks fast, even in slow motion." Thom Brennaman on Chapman's fastball.

  9. #8
    Retro-Gamer Krawhitham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,722

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    Quote Originally Posted by Knightro28 View Post
    Have to disagree with you. Had the Phillies kept Lee, then they don't go out and get Halladay. Some would say they could have kept both, but I don't think so.
    If they could trade for Oswalt, they could have kept both

  10. #9
    Retro-Gamer Krawhitham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,722

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    Quote Originally Posted by 757690 View Post
    The Phillies could not afford both Lee and Halladay.

    Oswalt
    10:$15M, 11:$16M, 12:$16M club option ($2M buyout)

    Lee was 8 Mill for 2010

  11. #10
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    10,071

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    Quote Originally Posted by Krawhitham View Post
    Oswalt
    10:$15M, 11:$16M, 12:$16M club option ($2M buyout)

    Lee was 8 Mill for 2010
    You're right about Lee. But the Astros sent $11M to the Phillies to cover all of what Oswalt had left on 2010 and part of 2011.

    Plus, the Phillies did win the division without Lee, and if the kept Lee, the don't get Oswalt, who went 7-1 with a 1.74 ERA with the Phils and was the team's best pitcher against SF in the playoffs.

    I don't see how it makes a difference. Lee is not replacing Halladay, and his collapse in game 1 was the main reason they lost the series. Basically, it's either Halladay, Lee, Hamels, or Halladay, Oswalt, Hamels. I just don't see the difference.
    "Man, the pitch looks fast, even in slow motion." Thom Brennaman on Chapman's fastball.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    303

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    IMO, they choose Halladay & Blanton over a Halladay & Lee combo. Terrible decision as Blanton couldn't hold Lee's Jockey strap.

  13. #12
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    10,071

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    And by the way, the Phillies already have $148M committed for next season, and that is without Jayson Werth. They are already talking about trading some dead weight, like Ibanez, Lidge and Blanton.
    "Man, the pitch looks fast, even in slow motion." Thom Brennaman on Chapman's fastball.

  14. #13
    Resident Hustleman
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    54

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    Quote Originally Posted by Oxblood View Post
    They could have had Lee & Halladay. They didn't need to sign Blanton and give such a crazy contract to Howard. After these playoffs that Howard contract looks very ugly. Possibly the worst playoff performance by an "all-star" that I can remember.
    that howard contract looked ugly from the day he signed it

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    303

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    Quote Originally Posted by Hustleman View Post
    that howard contract looked ugly from the day he signed it
    Lol, true.

  16. #15
    Firin Away Jr's Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,750

    Re: Trading Cliff Lee cost the Phillies the World Series

    The bats cost the Phills the Series.Someone forgot to call Ryan Howard and tell him the playoff's had started.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25