Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27

Thread: Trade proposal

  1. #16
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,160

    Re: Trade proposal

    Gotta love my Hakeem Nicks for Rashard Mendenhall trade now. Nicks is out for the rest of the fantasy season. This week my opponent had both Steve Johnson and Greg Jennings. I lost by two points.
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    Bread Gloves Razor Shines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    6,308

    Re: Trade proposal

    Yeah, Nicks would be tough to replace through the waiver.

    I've got some "who to start" issues this week, but in a good way.

    RBs: MJD, Bradshaw, Mcfadden

    WRs: Jennings, Fitzgerald, Boldin and Vincent Jackson

    Standard Two Backs, Two Wrs and a Flex.

    Pretty sure I'm starting all three backs and Jennings. So Boldin, Fitz or Jackson. Like a kid with a new toy I really want to start Jackson, but not sure if he's the best play.

  4. #18
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,160

    Re: Trade proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by Razor Shines View Post
    Yeah, Nicks would be tough to replace through the waiver.

    I've got some "who to start" issues this week, but in a good way.

    RBs: MJD, Bradshaw, Mcfadden

    WRs: Jennings, Fitzgerald, Boldin and Vincent Jackson

    Standard Two Backs, Two Wrs and a Flex.

    Pretty sure I'm starting all three backs and Jennings. So Boldin, Fitz or Jackson. Like a kid with a new toy I really want to start Jackson, but not sure if he's the best play.
    Patrick Crayton has a dislocated wrist. He is out several weeks. Floyd looked good before San Diego sat on the ball, and Gates should be back. I am rolling with Vincent Jackson as my replacement for Nicks. I see Fitz, Boldin, and Jackson as a pickem.
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  5. #19
    Bread Gloves Razor Shines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    6,308

    Re: Trade proposal

    Yeah, I'm with you on that one. I'm going to go with Jackson just so I can further my NFL Fantasy Executive of the year award that I've given myself, for picking up Vick, Orton, Hillis and now Jackson off of waivers this year.

  6. #20
    Bread Gloves Razor Shines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    6,308

    Re: Trade proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric_the_Red View Post
    Yeah, this weekend sure didn't help my argument.
    The fact that Jacobs is getting the majority of the carries isn't helping either.

  7. #21
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,160

    Re: Trade proposal

    Yep this weekend sunk my fantasy season

    I had Vincent Jackson, Reggie Wayne, Chris Johnson, and Mike Williams TB active. Ended up with 6.9 fantasy points.

    Malcolm Floyd
    Hakeem Nicks
    Mike Williams Seattle on the bench.
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  8. #22
    Bread Gloves Razor Shines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    6,308

    Re: Trade proposal

    I still won. VJack hurt but I had Vick, Nate Kaeding and Tamme to pull me through. Luckily the guy I played started TO, Aaron Hernandez and Santana Moss.

  9. #23
    Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy Eric_the_Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    2,171

    Re: Trade proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by Razor Shines View Post
    The fact that Jacobs is getting the majority of the carries isn't helping either.
    Jacobs got 14 carries. Bradshaw got 9 with 4 catches. They are very close to 50/50 in terms of plays, and the only reason it is that close is due to Bradshaw's trouble holding onto the ball this year. Both can be productive fantasy backs, and I would still rather have Bradshaw than Jacobs.

  10. #24
    Bread Gloves Razor Shines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    6,308

    Re: Trade proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric_the_Red View Post
    Jacobs got 14 carries. Bradshaw got 9 with 4 catches. They are very close to 50/50 in terms of plays, and the only reason it is that close is due to Bradshaw's trouble holding onto the ball this year. Both can be productive fantasy backs, and I would still rather have Bradshaw than Jacobs.
    Yeah, me too, but we were talking about bradshaw v. A. Foster.

  11. #25
    Bread Gloves Razor Shines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    6,308

    Re: Trade proposal

    Screw Tom Coughlin, he's intentionally trying ruin my season. What a dick.

  12. #26
    Bread Gloves Razor Shines's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    6,308

    Re: Trade proposal

    Luckily I started Vincent Jackson this week, I sat Boldin for him. But now that Rogers is out I need to decide between Jennings and Boldin. What do you guys think?

  13. #27
    Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy Eric_the_Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    2,171

    Re: Trade proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by Razor Shines View Post
    Luckily I started Vincent Jackson this week, I sat Boldin for him. But now that Rogers is out I need to decide between Jennings and Boldin. What do you guys think?
    Tough choice, but I think Boldin is the safer play.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25