Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    5,831

    Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    On the MLB Network? Tell how the 1968 and 1984 Tigers were ahead of the 1976 Reds who finished 8th on that list.

    Number 1....in every single offensive category,... outscoring the 2nd best team by over 100 runs.... best defense, best bullpen. Good grief who are these morons?

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Blowing away bad memories Redsfan320's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Oxford, OH
    Posts
    2,282

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    IDK, who cares man? You know and I know that they were the greatest team ever. You may have been lucky enough to have seen them play, now just relish the memory.

    320
    I'd rather listen to Kelch read the phone book than suffer through Thom Brennaman's attempt to make every instance on the field the most important event since the discovery of manned space flight. -westofyou

  4. #3
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    8,957

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    Quote Originally Posted by Tony Cloninger View Post
    On the MLB Network? Tell how the 1968 and 1984 Tigers were ahead of the 1976 Reds who finished 8th on that list.

    Number 1....in every single offensive category,... outscoring the 2nd best team by over 100 runs.... best defense, best bullpen. Good grief who are these morons?
    Yeah, I watched that program and was oddly annoyed too. Then again, their "Top 10 now" for RFers left Bruce off the list but included Heyward and Stanton. So, they've annoyed me a few times this week. Need real baseball to start...

  5. #4
    Blowing away bad memories Redsfan320's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Oxford, OH
    Posts
    2,282

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    their "Top 10 now" for RFers left Bruce off the list but included Heyward and Stanton.
    Yeah, that was bad. I was NOT pleased with that one. But once again, they can say whatever they want about him, and we'll sit back and watch Bruce rake for the Redlegs for years to come.

    320
    I'd rather listen to Kelch read the phone book than suffer through Thom Brennaman's attempt to make every instance on the field the most important event since the discovery of manned space flight. -westofyou

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    5,831

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    Quote Originally Posted by Redsfan320 View Post
    IDK, who cares man? You know and I know that they were the greatest team ever. You may have been lucky enough to have seen them play, now just relish the memory.

    320


    I am glad that you are such a happy person but I was looking for more of a detailed reason as to why they would pick them so low.....not just a Don't worry be happy and Go reds. But hey drink a beer and don't think too hard.

    Nothing about the 1984 and 1968 Tigers says Great team to me.

  7. #6
    We Need Our Myths reds1869's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Overlooking GABP
    Posts
    4,441

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    Those shows reflect the opinion of whoever is editing and producing. If w who see the world in Red were in charge the BRM would be up top. So if the people in charge are Tigers fans (or AL centric) there you go.

    As far as RFers go, wow. They included Stanton and not Bruce? Granted, they also listed Votto 4th below other NL 1B. I don't put a whole lot of stock in these shows, even though I enjoy them.

  8. #7
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,699

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    I get the outrage over the 76 Reds, but the 75 Reds were picked number 2. I don't think they wanted teams with essentially the same roster occupying spots real close together. It makes better TV that way.

    The 75 team won 108 games (most in the NL since the Pirates won 110 games in 1909) versus the 76 team's 102. The 76 team had some advantages over 75. Bob Bailey, Mike Lum and later Joel Youngblood as prime bench players were an improvement over Merv Rettenmund, Terry Crowley and John Vuckovich and Rookie of the Year Pat Zachry added to the rotation was more talented than Pat Darcy or Clay Kirby. Santo Alcala may have given some of that improvement back though and Clay Carroll being dealt for Rich Hinton after 1975 was a step backward for the 76 team. A really nice late season performance from Manny Sarmiento offset the loss of Carroll a bit. Overall, I think the 76 team rolling through the post-season without a loss was a better team than 75 even if 75 won more games in the regular season.
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS

  9. #8
    Blowing away bad memories Redsfan320's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Oxford, OH
    Posts
    2,282

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    I am glad that you are such a happy person but I was looking for more of a detailed reason as to why they would pick them so low.....not just a Don't worry be happy and Go reds. But hey drink a beer and don't think too hard.

    Nothing about the 1984 and 1968 Tigers says Great team to me.
    Ah well, actually too young to drink. The smiley just fit. I'm not sure why they would put them so far down. Maybe for the reason mth mentioned. I'm not sure. I guess, really, I'm sick of the poor National view of the Reds, too; but in the end they'll just come out looking stupid.

    320
    I'd rather listen to Kelch read the phone book than suffer through Thom Brennaman's attempt to make every instance on the field the most important event since the discovery of manned space flight. -westofyou

  10. #9
    Will post for food BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Dublin, OH
    Posts
    5,328

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    Quote Originally Posted by membengal View Post
    Yeah, I watched that program and was oddly annoyed too. Then again, their "Top 10 now" for RFers left Bruce off the list but included Heyward and Stanton.
    And I think they had Choo #2 or #3. lol.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    5,831

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    Quote Originally Posted by reds1869 View Post
    Those shows reflect the opinion of whoever is editing and producing. If w who see the world in Red were in charge the BRM would be up top. So if the people in charge are Tigers fans (or AL centric) there you go.

    As far as RFers go, wow. They included Stanton and not Bruce? Granted, they also listed Votto 4th below other NL 1B. I don't put a whole lot of stock in these shows, even though I enjoy them.


    I seriously doubt it was beacuse the editors and producers were Tigers fans and not big reds fans. It was voted by probably the people that work there (like the writers and former ballplayers)...which makes me question what they were thinking. It's not like they are voting for their favorite boy band and popularity of the team wins out.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    5,831

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    I get the outrage over the 76 Reds, but the 75 Reds were picked number 2. I don't think they wanted teams with essentially the same roster occupying spots real close together. It makes better TV that way.

    The 75 team won 108 games (most in the NL since the Pirates won 110 games in 1909) versus the 76 team's 102. The 76 team had some advantages over 75. Bob Bailey, Mike Lum and later Joel Youngblood as prime bench players were an improvement over Merv Rettenmund, Terry Crowley and John Vuckovich and Rookie of the Year Pat Zachry added to the rotation was more talented than Pat Darcy or Clay Kirby. Santo Alcala may have given some of that improvement back though and Clay Carroll being dealt for Rich Hinton after 1975 was a step backward for the 76 team. A really nice late season performance from Manny Sarmiento offset the loss of Carroll a bit. Overall, I think the 76 team rolling through the post-season without a loss was a better team than 75 even if 75 won more games in the regular season.

    I would have switched them myself.....that 1976 basically dominated in every way and into the playoffs, which no team has ever done which is sweep all the playoff games since the 1969 format began and has been expanded.

    I know they won 6 less games. I agree that Carroll trade was awful.....Clay still pitched well through 1977 which the Reds could have used very badly that year.

  13. #12
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,699

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    Maybe this is overly simplistic, but, IMO, 76 was better than 75 hands down. If you want to know why 75 won more games (IMO):

    Code:
    Name	         PA      R	HR	RBI	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+
    Bench 75	605	83	28	110	0.283	0.359	0.519	0.878	140
    Bench 76	552	62	16	74	0.234	0.348	0.394	0.741	109
    Even though Rose won the batting titles and got a lot of hits, Perez drove in the big runs, Morgan was MVP and Foster was an emerging monster, Johnny Bench was still the Reds primary advantage over everybody else. Catchers just didn't (and still don't) drive the offense the way he did. He woke-up in the 76 post season (OPS of 1.051 in the NLCS and 1.667 in the WS) and the Reds swept everybody.

    Wouldn't it be nice to have the best defensive catcher of all time with an OPS plus of 109 as his low number for a decade? That's what the Reds had that no one could match. Throughout the 70s, as great as they were, there were probably better players at their positions than Rose or Perez (my two personal favorites) and over the entire decade, even Morgan might have been eclipsed during some individual seasons, but Bench was always the best in the game at his position without it even being close.
    "All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

    Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS

  14. #13
    We Need Our Myths reds1869's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Overlooking GABP
    Posts
    4,441

    Re: Who is picking the Top 40 teams since expansion....

    Quote Originally Posted by Tony Cloninger View Post
    I seriously doubt it was beacuse the editors and producers were Tigers fans and not big reds fans. It was voted by probably the people that work there (like the writers and former ballplayers)...which makes me question what they were thinking. It's not like they are voting for their favorite boy band and popularity of the team wins out.
    Then I'll expand my statement to include them. My point was that it is merely opinion, and opinion is shaped by personal experience and background.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25