Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: MLB to take control of Dodgers

  1. #1
    '19 '40 '75 '76 '90
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    782

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    The glass is 1/3 full....
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    136

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    Yeah -- internally, they're a mess.
    The Crimson Crusader....knows...!
    ...heh heh heh heh...

    _________________________________________________
    "I offer my opponents a bargain:
    ...if they will stop telling lies about us, I will stop telling the truth about them."

    "Why does everybody stand up and sing "Take Me Out to the Ballgame"
    ...when they're already there?"

  4. #3
    real baseball - No DH
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    63

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    Some interesting quotes from the story at Sporting News.

    Once among baseball's glamour franchises, the Dodgers have been consumed by infighting since Jamie McCourt filed for divorce after 30 years of marriage in October 2009, one week after her husband fired her as the team's chief executive. Frank McCourt accused Jamie of having an affair with her bodyguard-driver and performing poorly at work.
    "As the 50 percent owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers, I welcome and support the commissioner's actions to provide the necessary transparency, guidance and direction for the franchise and for Dodgers fans everywhere," Jamie McCourt said in a statement.
    Selig's move might be seen by some as a precedent should the New York Mets have additional financial problems. With owners Fred Wilpon and Saul Katz under pressure from a lawsuit tied to the Bernard Madoff swindle, the Mets borrowed $25 million last year from Major League Baseball. Unlike the McCourts, Wilpon is a longtime friend of Selig.
    Rumor has it that McCourt is going to sue MLB which I believe is against MLB bylaws. Walter O'Malley must be spinning in his grave.

    "Kids are always chasing rainbows, but baseball is a world where you can catch them." ~
    Johnny Vander Meer

  5. #4
    Member Moosie52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    577

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    That's a Bowie knife Mrs. McCourt is twisting.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    3,236

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    I dont like MLB taking any control of any teams; I think either a sale should happen or the team folds until they can get control of thier own ship.
    UNC Tar Heels 2009 National Champions 5 time NCAA Champs
    57, 82, 93, 05, 09
    Go Heels!!!!!

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    369

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    Quote Originally Posted by bounty37h View Post
    I dont like MLB taking any control of any teams; I think either a sale should happen or the team folds until they can get control of thier own ship.
    Generally I agree, but this divorce situation is ridiculous and the McCourts are leveraging the team to pay off their personal debts right now. That's a complete screwjob and pretty much requires MLB to step in.

  8. #7
    real baseball - No DH
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    63

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    Quote Originally Posted by bounty37h View Post
    I dont like MLB taking any control of any teams; I think either a sale should happen or the team folds until they can get control of thier own ship.

    Selling a MLB team does not happen over night. If there is inadequate cash flow to meet payroll, debt service, and all the other expenses of running a team, steps have to be taken to keep the team afloat until an investor can take it over. That won't happen in a week or a month. And MLB can not afford to have a team temporarily drop out until their financial situation is cleared up. It's not a Division 3 college program that has minimal repercussions if it disbands.

    Selig can be a twit but he is probably doing what is in the best interests of MLB in this situation by preventing McCourt from sucking any more money out of the franchise.

    "Kids are always chasing rainbows, but baseball is a world where you can catch them." ~
    Johnny Vander Meer

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Weatherford, Texas
    Posts
    2,125

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    What is so frustrating with the blabbering fool that is Bud Selig.

    MLB won't let McCourt get a loan from FOX, or do a 1 Billion dollar TV deal with FOX to bring in the needed revenue...

    But Selig will loan the Mets & Wilpon $25 Million to make payroll?

    What a Joke Selig is. The sooner he is OUT of BASEBALL, the Better.

    Thats not my opinion. That's a FACT.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    369

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    Quote Originally Posted by Hondo View Post
    What is so frustrating with the blabbering fool that is Bud Selig.

    MLB won't let McCourt get a loan from FOX, or do a 1 Billion dollar TV deal with FOX to bring in the needed revenue...

    But Selig will loan the Mets & Wilpon $25 Million to make payroll?

    What a Joke Selig is. The sooner he is OUT of BASEBALL, the Better.

    Thats not my opinion. That's a FACT.
    Yeah, not exactly promoting equality. But I'd rather he not make the loan to at least one of them rather than make a loan to both. The McCourts are disgusting.

    And that's pretty much your opinion, not a fact.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Weatherford, Texas
    Posts
    2,125

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    Quote Originally Posted by lonewolf371 View Post
    Yeah, not exactly promoting equality. But I'd rather he not make the loan to at least one of them rather than make a loan to both. The McCourts are disgusting.

    And that's pretty much your opinion, not a fact.
    No, the guy is an Owner/Friends of Owners or has personal feelings towards owners...

    Pretty much when Bud Selig told Wilpon, (Met's owner - which they have been friends for many years according to the ESPN article) that he should hire Sandy Alderson, the Mets were in the Clear.

    Frank McCourt tries to loan himself money from his other business, and he cannot. He tries to get a TV Deal like the Yankees did for themselves. The Commisiioner Nixes it.

    The McCourts are in a Divorce. For you to call them disgusting makes no sense. I dont even like the Dodgers or the McCourts but your statement is based on their Divorce or what?

    In closing, the Commisioner of Baseball should be an Outside person who is like a Mediator. An Independent party that makes decisions unbiased.

    Bud Selig is a fool. Botched an All-Star Game and tinkers with the game more than anyone. Going to add more Wild Card teams for a 1 game Wild Card playoff?

    It is a Conflict of Interest for this fool to be running Baseball.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    3,236

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    Quote Originally Posted by Simon Rhymon View Post
    Selling a MLB team does not happen over night. If there is inadequate cash flow to meet payroll, debt service, and all the other expenses of running a team, steps have to be taken to keep the team afloat until an investor can take it over. That won't happen in a week or a month. And MLB can not afford to have a team temporarily drop out until their financial situation is cleared up. It's not a Division 3 college program that has minimal repercussions if it disbands.

    Selig can be a twit but he is probably doing what is in the best interests of MLB in this situation by preventing McCourt from sucking any more money out of the franchise.
    I do realize all this, but I dont see how it can be done (MLB run) without a conflict of interest and effect on all the other teams either.
    UNC Tar Heels 2009 National Champions 5 time NCAA Champs
    57, 82, 93, 05, 09
    Go Heels!!!!!

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Weatherford, Texas
    Posts
    2,125

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    Quote Originally Posted by bounty37h View Post
    I do realize all this, but I dont see how it can be done (MLB run) without a conflict of interest and effect on all the other teams either.
    It's just like when Baseball took over the Motreal Expos before they moved to Washington.

    The Expos did not offer All-Star OF Vladamir Guerrero Arbitration so they didn't get Draft Picks.

    EXAMPLE 1A of the Conflict of Interest!

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,666

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    I guess I just don't see the big deal in this. The present owner of the Dodgers is an idiot and bad for baseball as a whole, MLB stepping in while maybe not the best move, anything is better then what is happening out in LALA land right now...

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Weatherford, Texas
    Posts
    2,125

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    Quote Originally Posted by brm7675 View Post
    I guess I just don't see the big deal in this. The present owner of the Dodgers is an idiot and bad for baseball as a whole, MLB stepping in while maybe not the best move, anything is better then what is happening out in LALA land right now...
    Um, how do you know he is an Idiot?

    It's unsubstantiated posts like this that make it almost impossible to debate the person making the argument...

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,666

    Re: MLB to take control of Dodgers

    Quote Originally Posted by Hondo View Post
    Um, how do you know he is an Idiot?

    It's unsubstantiated posts like this that make it almost impossible to debate the person making the argument...
    Lets just go off of what happened opening day in LA and how long it took HIM to respond to it, his pathetic response and such to a FAN being almost KILLED at HIS stadium. That issue alone gets him "idiot" status. Outside of that, there is...

    1. Having Joe Torre leave your organization because of how screwed up it is shows he is an idiot

    2. Lying to MLB about his finacial status (which has been proven in court) shows what an idiot he is..

    3. The "mess" his divorce has become is more proof....


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25