Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: A trade idea

  1. #1
    -The Insider-
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,871

    A trade idea

    A week or so ago a guy from Baseball America (Ben Badler) mentioned a trade idea he had (meaning it's not rumored or anything like that.)
    He thought of a trade that would help both teams. It's a prospect for prospect swap in Devin Mesoraco to the Red Sox for shortstop Jose Iglesias.
    Mesoraco would give the Sox the catcher they desperately need as Salty and Tek are both struggling.
    Iglesias would give the Reds a Gold Glove shortstop who could be in the bigs by September and could be the best short stop the Reds have had since Larkin.
    It would also end the position speculation with Billy Hamilton, making him the Reds' second baseman of the future.
    Cincinnati can do this because they have Grandal (who is already on the 40-man roster) and could possibly be ready ready for a September call up in 2012.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    966

    Re: A trade idea

    Interesting idea, but it hinges pretty heavily on Grandal's success (which he still has to prove at higher levels, as good a year as he's having) and Hernandez and Hanigan's ability to keep up their production. And Janish is already a gold glove shortstop, so all we'll really be seeing is a slight uptick in offensive production instead of the true power bat that Mes brings.

    Also, sentimentally, I as a Reds fan love the idea of potentially having the best Reds catcher since Bench during this time.

    I'd be much more keen on Grandal/Francisco for an elite 3B prospect, where there's going to be a major hole developing as Rolen loses playing time.

  4. #3
    -The Insider-
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,871

    Re: A trade idea

    Quote Originally Posted by The DARK View Post
    Interesting idea, but it hinges pretty heavily on Grandal's success (which he still has to prove at higher levels, as good a year as he's having) and Hernandez and Hanigan's ability to keep up their production. And Janish is already a gold glove shortstop, so all we'll really be seeing is a slight uptick in offensive production instead of the true power bat that Mes brings.

    Also, sentimentally, I as a Reds fan love the idea of potentially having the best Reds catcher since Bench during this time.

    I'd be much more keen on Grandal/Francisco for an elite 3B prospect, where there's going to be a major hole developing as Rolen loses playing time.
    I agree. It'll be hard giving up Mes, but you would get someone who could be a number two hitter and likely provide more offense than Janish.

    As for finding that third baseman, I don't know who they could get. The only name that would be worth looking at would be Moustaksas but the Royals are not trading him.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    10,216

    Re: A trade idea

    Terrible idea. Iglesias is a slick glove, but his bat is a question mark. Reds have Cozart and Janish already. Mesoraco is a potential middle of the order hitting catcher. You don't give up a player like that for a player who at best barely upgrades what you already have.
    "Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,586

    Re: A trade idea

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipopcurve View Post
    Terrible idea. Iglesias is a slick glove, but his bat is a question mark. Reds have Cozart and Janish already. Mesoraco is a potential middle of the order hitting catcher. You don't give up a player like that for a player who at best barely upgrades what you already have.
    What he said, with a ditto for Grandal.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    10,216

    Re: A trade idea

    What he said, with a ditto for Grandal.
    Agreed. The only good reason to look at traded either of these guys is if you have a possible major upgrade coming back.
    "Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,586

    Re: A trade idea

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipopcurve View Post
    Agreed. The only good reason to look at traded either of these guys is if you have a possible major upgrade coming back.
    And quite frankly it's hard for me to imagine an upgrade that would be greater than what you get from potential middle-of-the-order hitting catchers who might cover that position for you for a decade. Having one of those guys in place gives you a huge advantage in going out to make the other moves needed to do position by position upgrades. But this points to a difficulty in making trades that I think gets overlooked a lot as we hear the refrain that the FO should do this or that: it gets hard to make meaningful trades when your players are pretty good. Not only is there a shorter list of players to trade for, but you've also got to give up more, thus raising the risks of serious miscalculation. I think that's very much Walt's dilemma now.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    10,216

    Re: A trade idea

    But this points to a difficulty in making trades that I think gets overlooked a lot as we hear the refrain that the FO should do this or that: it gets hard to make meaningful trades when your players are pretty good. Not only is there a shorter list of players to trade for, but you've also got to give up more, thus raising the risks of serious miscalculation. I think that's very much Walt's dilemma now.
    Absolutely. Trades are hard to make. As they say, you've got to be willing to give to get, and I think there are GMs out there who are petrified to make a mistake and will only do a deal if they feel they're somehow outfoxing their trade partner. I don't put Jocketty in that category -- I don't think he's afraid to give up talent and pull the trigger. But I do think he's got some budget restrictions that will make it tough for him to bring in (and keep) a big time player in exchange for prospects.
    "Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini

  10. #9
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    8,497

    Re: A trade idea

    I was under the impression that Iglasies (sp?) was an excellent defender, but a question mark with the bat. How is that different from what we've already got with Cozart? Even if he IS better...is he so much better that we'd part with Mesoraco? I don't see it.

    Besides, isn't Boston looking for a catcher who's ready RIGHT NOW? IMO, I think we should dangle Ramon Hernandez out there and see if there are any bites. Certainly doesn't hurt to listen. And at some point this season, Devin is going to force his way onto the big club.

  11. #10
    Member GOYA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    5,143

    Re: A trade idea

    Iglesias is hitting .221/.250/.221 with Pawtucket. He's also made 4 errors already at SS. But granted, he is only 21.

    Personally, I would prefer to stick with Cozart.

    If we're going to trade Mes or Grandal, I think we can get something better.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,586

    Re: A trade idea

    By way of reinforcing the previous posts about the wisdom of not trading Mes or Grandal for Iglesias--with which I totally agree--I'd remind RZers of the love shown over the years here (not by me) for Reid Brignac. Current line for him is OPS .456, with a .206
    SLG. The lesson I draw from this is to be exceedingly careful in trading for shortstops. Your guy that can't hit is likely to be just as good as their guy who can't hit. I think we tend to underrate Janish, Cozart, and, for that matter, Kris Negron. We'd have to give away a whole lot to do significantly better than one of those guys. In fact, all the way down our minor league system, this club is now rich in shortstops. Short of bringing in somebody like Stephen Drew, who's going to cost you somebody most RZers would put on their untouchable list, I wouldn't be looking to improve this club at SS, just because we have so many credible in-house options.

  13. #12
    Member OnBaseMachine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    34,844

    Re: A trade idea

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipopcurve View Post
    Terrible idea. Iglesias is a slick glove, but his bat is a question mark. Reds have Cozart and Janish already. Mesoraco is a potential middle of the order hitting catcher. You don't give up a player like that for a player who at best barely upgrades what you already have.
    I agree with this.
    I miss Adam Dunn.

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,198

    Re: A trade idea

    Not to mention the intangibles in leadership that you'd be giving away with Mes.
    2010 Mock Draft Selections (picking for Rays)

    Bryce Brentz
    Brandon Workman
    Kris Bryant
    Matt Lipka
    Rick Hague

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    127

    Re: A trade idea

    Plus aren't all Red Sox (and Yankee) prospects usually overrated?

    I'm happy to keep Mes, and I'm fine with Janish/Cozart unless there is a clear upgrade. This Red Sox prospect is not a clear upgrade.

  16. #15
    Member GOYA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    5,143

    Re: A trade idea

    Quote Originally Posted by REDblooded View Post
    Not to mention the intangibles in leadership that you'd be giving away with Mes.
    What gives you the impression Mes has leadership abilities?


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25