Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 95

Thread: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

  1. #16
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,358

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Quote Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
    I'm frusterated, but not worried yet. Stuff will begin to settle down with the pitching, and I believe Walt will make a move or two at the deadline. Extrememly frustrated, but not worried.

    I will say this, just above every moved Walt made in the offseason (Chapman a reliever, no real replacements in LF or SS) have backfried.
    Extending of Bruce, Cueto, Votto. Not extending Volquez beyond what he thought he was worth. Keeping Ramon.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    "So Fla Red"
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    5,631

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Quote Originally Posted by edabbs44 View Post
    Extending of Bruce, Cueto, Votto. Not extending Volquez beyond what he thought he was worth. Keeping Ramon.
    4 out of the 5 moves were excellent. We didn't extend Votto beyond 2013 which IMO was a major mistake in not getting 1-2 years of FA under his control. This probably tightens the window for the club to 2011-2013 from 2011-2015 and so far 2011 (after the 5-0 start) has been a pretty big dissappointment.

    The Bruce move managed to buy two more years of service and at least we got one more with Cueto into 2014.

  4. #18
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,358

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Quote Originally Posted by oregonred View Post
    4 out of the 5 moves were excellent. We didn't extend Votto beyond 2013 which IMO was a major mistake in not getting 1-2 years of FA under his control. This probably tightens the window for the club to 2011-2013 from 2011-2015 and so far 2011 (after the 5-0 start) has been a pretty big dissappointment.

    The Bruce move managed to buy two more years of service and at least we got one more with Cueto into 2014.
    It didn't sound like more than 3 years with Votto was an option.

  5. #19
    Member Reds/Flyers Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati USA
    Posts
    3,385

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Walt is the LVP (least valuable player) this year for his awful stand-pat offseason. It was painfully obvious that another year with Johnny Gomes as your LF and no true No. 1 starter was going to haunt them - and it has. Walt has sat on these prospects for far too long. It's time to flip some for real help.

  6. #20
    Member Homer Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    4,700

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Quote Originally Posted by Reds/Flyers Fan View Post
    Walt is the LVP (least valuable player) this year for his awful stand-pat offseason. It was painfully obvious that another year with Johnny Gomes as your LF and no true No. 1 starter was going to haunt them - and it has. Walt has sat on these prospects for far too long. It's time to flip some for real help.
    I just flipped through about 10 pages of your posts. Honestly, when was the last time you made an even somewhat positive comment?

  7. #21
    "So Fla Red"
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    5,631

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Quote Originally Posted by edabbs44 View Post
    It didn't sound like more than 3 years with Votto was an option.
    Agree, I'm certain they tried because it was so crucial to have him locked up into 2014 and 2015 to extend the window for the current young core. With an MVP in hand that ship had unfortunately sailed.

  8. #22
    Member Superdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,812

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Originally Posted by Reds/Flyers Fan View Post
    Walt is the LVP (least valuable player) this year for his awful stand-pat offseason. It was painfully obvious that another year with Johnny Gomes as your LF and no true No. 1 starter was going to haunt them - and it has. Walt has sat on these prospects for far too long. It's time to flip some for real help.

    I just flipped through about 10 pages of your posts. Honestly, when was the last time you made an even somewhat positive comment?
    What's he supposed to say? Walt really nailed it?

  9. #23
    Member Homer Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    4,700

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Quote Originally Posted by Superdude View Post
    What's he supposed to say? Walt really nailed it?
    My comment wasn't specific to that post in particular. It was in response to someone that literally every single post is complaining about something. I understand RZ is a place to vent, but it gets beyond tiresome to hear someone only point out the negatives on a team that isn't bad (it happened last year as well).

  10. #24
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,445

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    In the FWIW department, many of the projection systems has us in the 84-86 win range. My take is that every season has its ups and downs. Clearly we're deep in a down right now, but the talent usually shines through. Nobody is seriously injured (that we know of) and its a long, long season. This team is something between mediocre and great and I would love to see WJ turn some minor league talent in to major league talent.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  11. #25
    Member cincrazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    South Vienna, OH
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Quote Originally Posted by Homer Bailey View Post
    My comment wasn't specific to that post in particular. It was in response to someone that literally every single post is complaining about something. I understand RZ is a place to vent, but it gets beyond tiresome to hear someone only point out the negatives on a team that isn't bad (it happened last year as well).
    They're not bad, but they're not nearly as good as some around here think. SS and LF were bound to be black holes, yet they weren't addressed. Everyone talked about the depth of the rotation, but they're young pitchers. Young pitchers are the most unrelied upon group of individuals in professional sports.

    This team has major problems. I'm not saying the season is over, but as constituted, this is the third best team in the division, and it isn't particularly close. I don't know how anyone can look at the rotation and say for certain "It will get better." I don't see it. It is what it is, which is a major problem.

  12. #26
    Time is the Revelator.
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN
    Posts
    7,281

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Friday Leak vs. Hanson (2.72 ERA)
    Saturday Arroyo vs. Lowe (3.53 ERA)
    Sunday Cueto vs. Jurrjens (1.56 ERA)

    .. uhh..

  13. #27
    Oy Vey! Red in Chicago's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,456

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Quote Originally Posted by Homer Bailey View Post
    I just flipped through about 10 pages of your posts. Honestly, when was the last time you made an even somewhat positive comment?
    Homer, you've got too much time on your hands

  14. #28
    Danger is my business! oneupper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,257

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    I would trade our rotation for the rotation of any other team in the NL, with perhaps the exception of Nats, Pirates and Dbacks (and not so sure about those).

    Starting pitching. Wish we had more/better.
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

    http://dalmady.blogspot.com

  15. #29
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Quote Originally Posted by oneupper View Post
    I would trade our rotation for the rotation of any other team in the NL, with perhaps the exception of Nats, Pirates and Dbacks (and not so sure about those).

    Starting pitching. Wish we had more/better.
    Wow. Really?

    Cueto, Bailey, Arroyo, Wood and take your pick of Volquez, Leake, LeCure.

    Cueto & Bailey are both very solid. Arroyo's going to give you what he always gives you. His numbers are skewed because he's already had his yearly blowout outing and it's early. Wood has been much better than his numbers indicate. That's 4 solid starters and a 5th starter of varying options all with considerable upside.

    Maybe I'm in the minority, but there aren't many rotations I WOULD trade ours for.

  16. #30
    Member Homer Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    4,700

    Re: The Panic Button (version 2.0)

    Quote Originally Posted by Red in Chicago View Post
    Homer, you've got too much time on your hands
    Haha, I do..... but it was a trend I had been noticing for quite some time. A five minute search confirmed my beliefs.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator