Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 41

Thread: Matt Kemp

  1. #16
    Member texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    19,720

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Quote Originally Posted by BAKER12 View Post
    What do you guys expect Walt and Dusty to say, "Our guys all suck and we are desperate for help in left field and short"
    I would expect Walt to be very quiet on the subject. The team has had a hole in LF since they traded away Adam Dunn in August of 2008. We are one day away from it being June of 2011. Nearly three years and the Reds still have a huge problem in LF. Yes, I would definitely expect the GM who hasn't filled that glaring need in three years to be very, very quiet on the subject.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Quote Originally Posted by texasdave View Post
    I would expect Walt to be very quiet on the subject. The team has had a hole in LF since they traded away Adam Dunn in August of 2008. We are one day away from it being June of 2011. Nearly three years and the Reds still have a huge problem in LF. Yes, I would definitely expect the GM who hasn't filled that glaring need in three years to be very, very quiet on the subject.
    It's pretty evident that the issue is a money/payroll increase, unfortunately.

  4. #18
    Member texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    19,720

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Maybe I am overstepping my authority here, but I am putting Vottomatic in charge of making the deal that gets Kemp in a Reds' uniform. Don't worry about cost or prospects or any of that trivial stuff. Just make the deal and I will smooth it over with Walt and Bob. Git-r-done!

  5. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,666

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Quote Originally Posted by Vottomatic View Post
    It's pretty evident that the issue is a money/payroll increase, unfortunately.
    Maybe, but i really believe that both Dusty and Walt believe Gomes will 'turn it around' and will wait and give him every chance.

  6. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    959

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Quote Originally Posted by Vottomatic View Post
    If this team was willing to acquire both Kemp and Reyes, this team wins the division. But they can't afford it.
    I agree these guys would be a big upgrade from what we are currently trotting out to LF and SS, but the Reds have scored more runs than any team in baseball. Unless Kemp and Reyes can go into the starting rotation and put up 7+ innings of sub 3.00 era for the rest of the season I don't think they are going to cure what ails this team right now.

  7. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    992

    Re: Matt Kemp

    I actually wanted us to go after him in the offseason when he had a down year. The whole Dodgers team was a wreck last year and I thought we could have gotten him at a cheaper price than what it would cost us now

  8. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Grantham, PA
    Posts
    285

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Quote Originally Posted by 5TimeWSChamps View Post
    I actually wanted us to go after him in the offseason when he had a down year. The whole Dodgers team was a wreck last year and I thought we could have gotten him at a cheaper price than what it would cost us now
    I agree, Kemp probably would have been a good target last year. After his start this year, his value is much greater. Personally, I think Stubbs is over-rated. I have been really impressed with his improvement this year. But his number of K's and low OBP make him less valuable. He keeps improving, but the K numbers are just too high. There are not many CFers with his power numbers, speed, and great defense. So it is hard to give up on him, but the K numbers and low OBP make him an interesting case.

  9. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    502

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Quote Originally Posted by brm7675 View Post
    Maybe, but i really believe that both Dusty and Walt believe Gomes will 'turn it around' and will wait and give him every chance.
    I think you're too pessimistic about Dusty and Walt. Gomes is not getting much playing time right now. If he continues to hit like he has the last 2 games he'll be fine, but I don't think they're going to let him work through another prolonged slump.

  10. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,666

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Quote Originally Posted by Hillsdale87 View Post
    I think you're too pessimistic about Dusty and Walt. Gomes is not getting much playing time right now. If he continues to hit like he has the last 2 games he'll be fine, but I don't think they're going to let him work through another prolonged slump.
    Why not, they let him continue to play last year after his numbers declined and then resigned him. They have played him much more then his numbers warrent. They will continue to run him out there, especially after last night and Sunday they will see him "coming" around.

  11. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    502

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Quote Originally Posted by brm7675 View Post
    Why not, they let him continue to play last year after his numbers declined and then resigned him. They have played him much more then his numbers warrent. They will continue to run him out there, especially after last night and Sunday they will see him "coming" around.
    Well he was sitting on the bench all of last week. I'm fine with him playing against lefties, and he's playing tonight but he's had good success off Greinke. I think Jonny as the everyday LF is done

  12. #26
    Member texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    19,720

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Quote Originally Posted by Hillsdale87 View Post
    Well he was sitting on the bench all of last week. I'm fine with him playing against lefties, and he's playing tonight but he's had good success off Greinke. I think Jonny as the everyday LF is done
    Yes, he lit Greinke up back in 2005. Last year he was 0-4 with 3 Ks. Which is more relevant?

  13. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,666

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Quote Originally Posted by Hillsdale87 View Post
    Well he was sitting on the bench all of last week. I'm fine with him playing against lefties, and he's playing tonight but he's had good success off Greinke. I think Jonny as the everyday LF is done
    Under normal leadership I would agree, but we don't have that in Cincy. Just about any other team with the depth of talent we have would hav DFA'ed Gomes weeks ago.

  14. #28
    '19 '40 '75 '76 '90
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    953

    Re: Matt Kemp

    According to the E:60 story on Gomes he's our everyday left fielder.

  15. #29
    5.3 Posts Abv Replacement BluegrassRedleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    South of Cincinnati
    Posts
    6,246

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Destroyed us today. Made me drool thinking of him playing half his games in GABP.
    Rounding third and heading for home...

  16. #30
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: Matt Kemp

    Quote Originally Posted by BluegrassRedleg View Post
    Destroyed us today. Made me drool thinking of him playing half his games in GABP.
    The Reds would have 3 MVP candidates with Kemp batting 4th. Also maintains Dusty's lefty (Votto), righty (Kemp), lefty (Bruce) lineup.

    Kemp makes $6.5M this year.

    I could live with Janish at SS (although I'd like to see Cozart) and Rolen at 3B if they acquired Kemp.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator