Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

  1. #1
    Cruisin' for trouble
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    3,290

    Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    This from Cueto last night:

    “I had two different pitcher’s mounds,” Cueto said, through a translator. “In the bullpen the mound is kind of flat. In the game, it’s like a regular mound. It was tough in the first inning to make an adjustment with my landing.”

    So, yeah, the mounds were different, but Cueto was able to work it out. He observed that the mounds were different, but didn't actually complain about it.

    Get that Tony?

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    10,249

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    If this is typical home field advantage manuevering, MLB should have umpires do routine checks. Not that hard to police, I would think. Teams shouldn't be doing this kind of stuff, though I'm not surprised in the least that they do.
    "Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini

  4. #3
    Unsolicited Opinions traderumor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Right Down Broadway
    Posts
    18,711

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    My guess is that not a whole lot of attention is given to bullpen mound specs. Maybe MLB should supervise their league. Quite a concept, I know. Maybe they can't afford to hire a person to do that.
    Can't win with 'em

    Can't win without 'em

  5. #4
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,883

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    Quote Originally Posted by GoReds View Post
    This from Cueto last night:

    “I had two different pitcher’s mounds,” Cueto said, through a translator. “In the bullpen the mound is kind of flat. In the game, it’s like a regular mound. It was tough in the first inning to make an adjustment with my landing.”

    So, yeah, the mounds were different, but Cueto was able to work it out. He observed that the mounds were different, but didn't actually complain about it.

    Get that Tony?
    I don't think this is any different than what TLR was saying. This is complaining about it. Not talking about it at all would be not complaining about it.

  6. #5
    Danger is my business! oneupper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Back in Florida
    Posts
    8,158

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    What question was asked?
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

    http://dalmady.blogspot.com

  7. #6
    Member cumberlandreds's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Sterling VA
    Posts
    9,461

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    Quote Originally Posted by traderumor View Post
    My guess is that not a whole lot of attention is given to bullpen mound specs. Maybe MLB should supervise their league. Quite a concept, I know. Maybe they can't afford to hire a person to do that.
    They wouldn't have to hire anyone. Let the umpires do it. When a new umpiring crew comes into the city they can take out a tape measure and see if it is the same as the mound on the playing field. This shouldn't take anymore than five minutes. But its too easy for MLB. The way they move at glacial speeds to change things this will never happen.
    Reds Fan Since 1971

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    7,206

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    I don't think this is any different than what TLR was saying. This is complaining about it. Not talking about it at all would be not complaining about it.
    I agree. If we take off the Reds colored glasses, this is something that should be handled in house. Cueto would have been better off saying that the mound felt different in the bullpen.

    When you say definitively there's a difference, you make yourself out to be an horses backside when someone goes out and measures them and finds they are the same height.

    This is something Cueto should have said something to Dusty and/or Price, they should have had an umpire look at it today, and if they are different heights, the Giants should see a big big penalty.
    When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
    ---Joe Posnanski

  9. #8
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    43,272

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    I don't think this is any different than what TLR was saying. This is complaining about it. Not talking about it at all would be not complaining about it.
    Yep, and be sure we can count on a thread somewhere saying the Reds are whining.

    And I say who gives a rats behind if there is?

  10. #9
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    43,272

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    Quote Originally Posted by cumberlandreds View Post
    They wouldn't have to hire anyone. Let the umpires do it. When a new umpiring crew comes into the city they can take out a tape measure and see if it is the same as the mound on the playing field. This shouldn't take anymore than five minutes. But its too easy for MLB. The way they move at glacial speeds to change things this will never happen.
    Actually a league official shows up to check these things IIRC.

  11. #10
    Member cumberlandreds's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Sterling VA
    Posts
    9,461

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    Actually a league official shows up to check these things IIRC.
    Its on them then. Cueto should have told Dusty or Price and let them take it the umpires or whoever to get it fixed. Not that much of issue anyway. It all turned out good in the end. I took Cueto's comments as a statement of fact and not really complaining.
    Reds Fan Since 1971

  12. #11
    Member VR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Vancouver, Wa
    Posts
    8,591

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    Well......maybe it wasn't quite as whiny as the Cards approach.














    Rockies head groundskeeper Mark Razum told The Denver Post that the bullpen and game mound were measured before Saturday's game and everything checked out fine.

    But before Saturday's game, Cardinals pitching coach Dave Duncan and La Russa got into an animated argument about it.


    Carpenter, a contender for the Cy Young Award, was blunt with his criticism Friday.

    "The mound in the bullpen was way flatter. I don't know if they do it on purpose, but no question, it was different," Carpenter said.



    Read more: La Russa angry over bullpen mound's height - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/commented/...#ixzz1OspvTf5l
    Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
    Baseball is like church. Many attend, few understand

  13. #12
    Stat Wanker Hodiernus RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    16,178

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    Only difference is that Cueto figured it out and was quite successful in spite of it.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  14. #13
    Et tu, Brutus? Brutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    10,592

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    I don't think this is any different than what TLR was saying. This is complaining about it. Not talking about it at all would be not complaining about it.
    I don't think it's quite the same. Cueto was, presumably, asked a direct question why he struggled in the first inning. He gave an answer that would explain his early struggles.

    LaRussa was just pontificating as he usually does.
    "No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda

  15. #14
    CELEBRATION TIME RBA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    San Marcos, CA
    Posts
    13,987

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    The Reds should contract with a company that can provide them digital tools to instantaneously measure the mounds and compare them. The technology is there, it just has to be modified to do it. The Reds could issued their protest instantly with documentation.

  16. #15
    Be the ball Roy Tucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Mason, OH
    Posts
    12,372

    Re: Cueto: SF bullpen mound issues

    Quote Originally Posted by RBA View Post
    The Reds should contract with a company that can provide them digital tools to instantaneously measure the mounds and compare them. The technology is there, it just has to be modified to do it. The Reds could issued their protest instantly with documentation.
    Maybe we could tie it into Google Earth or CIA spy satellites and have a www.fieldmetrics.mlb.com.

    Or use a tape measure and level.


    Pay attention to the open sky


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25