If people over-analyzed the numbers with every team in the league the way they did the Reds, I think the Reds offense would be appreciated a bit more.
If people over-analyzed the numbers with every team in the league the way they did the Reds, I think the Reds offense would be appreciated a bit more.
"Rounding 3rd and heading for home, good night everybody"
Well, nobody is saying to let the pitching rot, but this team isn't going to become the '71 Orioles or '95 Braves. The Rotation will continue to be in the bottom third of the league even when they are pitching relatively well. Part of that is the environment that they play in. GABP at home with lots of road games in places like Wrigley, Houston and Milwaukee. If this offense is 5th in the league under those conditions, its not that impressive. If the pitching is in the middle, I'd say that's the best we can do. No reason to keep running black holes out there when alternatives are on hand. Get Cozart up and get somebody like Hermida or Alonso to platoon with Gomes. The LF combo could probably hit in the 5 hole if platooned properly. Rolen would be pushed further down in the order and coupled with Cozart would hopefully add some production at the bottom. A few extra runs here and there could add wins. Why are so many against adding wins?
Ideally, we would resurrect Eppa Rixey and Bucky Walters and stick them in the front of the rotation, but I don't see this team having the cash for any top of the line starters if any became available so lets ensure that this stays a top 3 offense. Barring some black magic with Eppa and Bucky, to win 90 games, any less than one of the top offenses won't do.
All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!
Mth...no one is against adding wins. We'd all love an upgrade to LF or SS. But as it stands now the offense is the best in the league, yet people continue to sell it short. A reasonable point as made above is fine, but to speak of how April caused this offense to fool everyone is not.
Other than the Reds offense looking like it still had jet lag they played a good game. Some really great defense was wasted as was a good pitching perfromance by Leake. Just two or three bad pitches cost Leake. Overall a good game except for the fact they lost. If they play like that defensively and pitching wise most nights this team will be fine.
Reds Fan Since 1971
So how many RPG do you see this team averaging over the second half?
The 5.2 RPG that they averaged in April would annualize to an 840+ run powerhouse. The 4.7 or so since then would annualize to a little over 760. IMO that isn't good enough for this team to win much more than 85 games. I keep hearing how they are leading the league in runs, but they aren't the 840 run powerhouse from April. I think many think that they still are. I'd love to have better pitching, but I don't think this team can win 95 games while scoring 760 runs unless they upgrade 3 spots in the rotation.
All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!
If I were able to bet, I would say 4.8-4.9 Runs a game. 4.85 if you want me to pinpoint it. Thats pretty much exactly where they stand seasonlong and for the month of June.
I'm all for improvement though. I'll take an upgrade at a few positions. But if things don't change, I still expect the Reds to be a top-3 offense easily, and if again, I could bet, I would expect them to score more runs than any team in the NL from here on out.
If anyone ever wondered what a "red herring" was, see Exhibit A bolded.
I'm still waiting for you to address the question I asked. If leading the league in offense with the same cast of characters, and that cast of characters also is probably the best defensive team in the league, why do folks continue to rail in low scoring losses against the players producing those results? Ok, I'm fine with DFAing Gomes and switching out Cozart for Renteria. But do you really honestly think that is going to take us from a 3 over team to a 95 win team, or even a 90 win team? That is the point I'm really missing here.
"Rounding 3rd and heading for home, good night everybody"
You're right, You are missing the point. At 3 games over the winning % was .521. Over 162 games that is 84 wins. If they add 5 wins by scoring some more runs in close games, it might make adding a starter meaningful. An 84 win team isn't going to become a 95 win team by adding an Ace and leaving the rest status quo.
This isn't a case of a magic bullet fixing everything. Adding incremental improvements takes a team from 84 win caliber to 95 win caliber. Part of that is making it harder to wade through the line-up for the opposing pitcher by making improvements in obvious areas of weakness. Those are usually the easiiest spots to improve. Upgrading from a .550 OPS to a .700 OPS from the SS in the 8 hole won't win anything by itself, but its an incremental upgrade that will lead to more production and might convert a close loss or two to a win. Sticking a serious threat in LF that would make it difficult for pitchers to avoid Votto and Bruce doing all the damage would add runs beyond his individual performance. Adding a little production to the bottom of the order by pushing Rolen down and taking away such an automatic out in the 8th spot would make it much more difficult to pitch to this team. They have lost a lot of games where the pitching was good enough and they just didn't score enough runs while the opposing pitcher cruised through the line-up easily. Those are obvious spots to try to improve and improvement will add wins. Nobody thinks these changes will automatically improve the team, but its obvious the current collection of players isn't good enough. So quit frittering the season away and try to improve already.
That is the point being missed. This team needs to add wins where it can get them. Yes, the pitching is awful and the offense scores a lot of runs, but they can't/won't improve the pitching enough to take this team from 84 wins to 95 wins. But just maybe an upgrade at SS, a LF who can fill the 5 hole and a deal for a rotation upgrade could get them there. There is an obvious guy easily available to attempt to upgrade SS who won't cost anything and won't hurt the defense. There are multiple guys who may be able to platoon with Gomes and make that 5th spot in the order very productive and there are lots of other blocked kids who could be dealt to upgrade the rotation. Those incremental improvements aren't coming from sticking with this 25 man roster. Some changes are a phone call away and won't cost anything. Its time to start finding out if those changes can make a difference now, before they pull the trigger on a deal for an ace that empties the farm and still leaves this team short anyway. Waiting just increases the risk of making a huge organizational mistake IMO.
All my posts are my opinion - just like yours are. If I forget to state it and you're too dense to see the obvious, look here!
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |