Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

  1. #1
    Member Redlegs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Outer view seats
    Posts
    839

    Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    Interesting article this month in Cincinnati Magazine regarding the Reds attendence. The article mentions some eye opening facts in regards to the city whereas it basically states Cincinnati has never been a big attendence town with the exception of a few years here and there and the decade of the 70's. Also went on to state the difference in attendence between a town like St. Louis and ours results in about 50M dollars of revenue per year. Wow!

    Your thoughts?
    As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    We Need Our Myths reds1869's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Overlooking GABP
    Posts
    4,397

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    The article was interesting and I largely agree with it. It isn't just the Reds, it is sports and entertainment in general. Concert promoters have a hard time filling their venues even when top national acts are in town, and the only local team that consistently plays to capacity crowds is Xavier.

  4. #3
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    41,625

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    If the world comes to an end, I want to be in Cincinnati. Everything comes there ten years later.

    Mark Twain
    All I have to say is the writer is correct, and must read this boards archives.

  5. #4
    Member Reds/Flyers Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati USA
    Posts
    3,365

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by reds1869 View Post
    The article was interesting and I largely agree with it. It isn't just the Reds, it is sports and entertainment in general. Concert promoters have a hard time filling their venues even when top national acts are in town, and the only local team that consistently plays to capacity crowds is Xavier.
    Possibly because the Cintas Center is relatively small (10,250) and a lot of the student body/fan base isn't from Greater Cincinnati, so maybe they are exempt from the lackadaisical local attendance phenomenon.

    But it does seem like the only thing that consistently sells out, and the only thing it is genuinely tough to get tickets to, is Reds' Opening Day. The Bengals don't sell out without help from a big-time visiting team (Steelers, Packers, Cowboys), the Reds rarely sell out without help from a big-time visiting team (Cubs, Cards, Yanks), concerts don't sell out. It doesn't make sense ... Just up the road in Dayton, the Dragons are on the sellout streak and the Flyers never get crowds under 12,500; in Columbus OSU football always sells out; in Lexington and Louisville there are always sellouts for UK and U of L. But not here ...

    The Bengals needed all kinds of last-minute extensions and gimmicks to sell out almost every game during their 10-6 playoff year in 2009. Phish didn't sell out Riverbend this summer despite selling out virtually everywhere else. And tickets still remain for Paul McCartney in August at GABP and even Jimmy Buffett later this summer.

  6. #5
    Member Sea Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    15,475

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    I think Reds attendance is right about where you'd expect it to be. They have a mediocre team in a mediocre market, thus they are 16th out of 32 teams in avg attendance. All the teams above them are in larger markets with the possible exception of Minnesota and Milwaukee--both still enjoying the honeymoon of a new stadium. However I did find it interesting that the Reds road attendance is #2, Yankees were #1

    As for the Bengals I'd say this town has supported them to a fault. There were several yrs in a row where no games were blacked out. Considering how Mike Brown has treated this town in the past 20 yrs it's amazing they have the crowds they do. Put together 4 yrs of .500 or better and there'll be a waiting list for Bengal tickets

  7. #6
    Member mdccclxix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,487

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by Sea Ray View Post
    I think Reds attendance is right about where you'd expect it to be. They have a mediocre team in a mediocre market, thus they are 16th out of 32 teams in avg attendance. All the teams above them are in larger markets with the possible exception of Minnesota and Milwaukee--both still enjoying the honeymoon of a new stadium. However I did find it interesting that the Reds road attendance is #2, Yankees were #1

    As for the Bengals I'd say this town has supported them to a fault. There were several yrs in a row where no games were blacked out. Considering how Mike Brown has treated this town in the past 20 yrs it's amazing they have the crowds they do. Put together 4 yrs of .500 or better and there'll be a waiting list for Bengal tickets
    I agree. Similarly, if you look at the Reds, they haven't sustained success for a period of time like the Cardinals have. Keep winning over the next 3-4 years and throw in a NLCS or WS appearance and the attendance figure will probably climb near 35k would be my guess.

  8. #7
    I thought you'd be bigger OldXOhio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Green Country
    Posts
    2,716

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by Sea Ray View Post
    All the teams above them are in larger markets with the possible exception of Minnesota and Milwaukee--both still enjoying the honeymoon of a new stadium.
    Hear ya on Minn, but Miller Park came into existence before the GABP and I'd say the honeymoon with our new park has been over for some time. I think the Brewers fans simply do a good job of supporting what has been a competitive team now for several years. I don't know that it's anything more than something akin to the Cardinals' fans mantra of "it's what we do".
    Originally Posted by nate
    Chapman can be downright pornographic at times.

  9. #8
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    34,171

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by OldXOhio View Post
    Hear ya on Minn, but Miller Park came into existence before the GABP and I'd say the honeymoon with our new park has been over for some time. I think the Brewers fans simply do a good job of supporting what has been a competitive team now for several years. I don't know that it's anything more than something akin to the Cardinals' fans mantra of "it's what we do".
    MIL has always had good baseball fans. When they moved the Braves there in the 50s they drew around 2.5M when 1M was outstanding. They supported them until it was clear they were going to move to ATL. When the Brewers were in the AL they were usually pretty respectable and about on a par with the Reds. They have drawn at least 2.7M 5 times and the Reds haven't ever touched that figure. Having a retractable roof - especially in April, May and September - helps but I believe even if the Reds had a retractable roof, they would draw about what they do now.
    The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160

  10. #9
    Member mdccclxix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,487

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    MIL has always had good baseball fans. When they moved the Braves there in the 50s they drew around 2.5M when 1M was outstanding. They supported them until it was clear they were going to move to ATL. When the Brewers were in the AL they were usually pretty respectable and about on a par with the Reds. They have drawn at least 2.7M 5 times and the Reds haven't ever touched that figure. Having a retractable roof - especially in April, May and September - helps but I believe even if the Reds had a retractable roof, they would draw about what they do now.
    I wish we had the luxury of finding out. Too bad.

  11. #10
    A Little to the Left Redsfaithful's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bexley, OH
    Posts
    7,454

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    I would have liked to have seen attendance at Broadway Commons. Cincinnati kind of has a blind spot with putting everything on the river.

    I do think now that the rest of the riverfront development is filling in that it will have a positive effect on attendance.
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
    --Oscar Wilde

  12. #11
    Et tu, Brutus? Brutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga.
    Posts
    10,195

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    It should be noted that Cincinnati is the second smallest TV market, as designated by Nielsen media's boundaries (only Milwaukee is smaller).

    But in terms of actual people within a 30-mile radius of the ballpark, Cincinnati is the smallest market in baseball by a great deal.

    What this means is that fewer people are within striking distance to go to a baseball game on a given weeknight. So that the Reds aren't a huge attendance town isn't so much an indictment on the city or the fanbase as much as it is a consequence of the geographical makeup of the market and how people are more spread out than some markets are.

    This is why they draw well for weekend games but not so much during weeknight games during the school year. Families with kids can't make 1 or 2-hour drives on a school night or work night.
    "No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Richmond, Indiana
    Posts
    1,679

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    Redsfaithful hit on the problem-that stadium is kinda ridiculous to get to. I've been there at least 100 times in the last 20 years- heck, probably more than that...it's brutal to try to get there- it just is. It's as if they set out to put a stadium at the end of a Rube Goldberg production.

    People from Cincy defend it and tell me how easy it is--it ain't. It's absolutely brutal and that greatly effects the overall experience. People do not want to have to jump thru that many hoops to get to a ballgame.

    I've been to 8 or 9 other mlb ballparks and 10-12 minor league parks. Getting to a ball game in cincy is still the worst. Ask someone from outside the cincinnatia area. Everybody has a horror story about getting lost or almost killed getting to that park.

  14. #13
    "So Fla Red"
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    South Florida - The Real Humidor
    Posts
    5,053

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    The franchise has had three postseason appearances since 1980 and one of those was after the lost season of 1994. It's amazing that they have drawn 2M as many times as they have since the early 90s especially given the small size of the local market for weekday games and the lack of anything interesting in the area near GABP.

    The fanbase had to endure the Schott and Lindner eras and the overall negative stench of professional sports in the city from the late 80's to the present thanks to Mike Brown.

    They haven't had two clean years of serious back to back contention since the the late 70's (94/95 doesn't count). Yes, there were lots of 2nd place finishes in the late 80's, but the Reds were never were really in serious playoff contention over the last six weeks in any of the '85-'89 seasons.

    Even the glow of the WS championship of 1990 was quickly lost with a dismal 1991 and the subsequent departure of Sweet Lou for greener pastures after '92. Then the Indians soon hit the jackpot with Jacob's Field and a great young team to erode the fan support in Central Ohio.

    The arrival of Griffey after the great 1999 run had all the potential of 3M attendance seasons (and they would have gotten there in 2000 with a seriously contending team). But the buzz of 2000 quickly faded and the halo of KGJ's arrival was lost in the injuries/unfair piling on by the local press.

    Finally 2011 looked so full of promise for back to back playoff runs. Toss in a seriously underacheiving 44-45 record and overall uninspiring play -- just in time to derail another nice rise in the attendance trend. And low and behold, the Indians cleaned their clocks in the season series and are sitting in first place...

  15. #14
    Member mdccclxix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,487

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by oregonred View Post
    The franchise has had three postseason appearances since 1980 and one of those was after the lost season of 1994. It's amazing that they have drawn 2M as many times as they have since the early 90s especially given the small size of the local market for weekday games and the lack of anything interesting in the area near GABP.

    The fanbase had to endure the Schott and Lindner eras and the overall negative stench of professional sports in the city from the late 80's to the present thanks to Mike Brown.

    They haven't had two clean years of serious back to back contention since the the late 70's (94/95 doesn't count). Yes, there were lots of 2nd place finishes in the late 80's, but the Reds were never were really in serious playoff contention over the last six weeks in any of the '85-'89 seasons.

    Even the glow of the WS championship of 1990 was quickly lost with a dismal 1991 and the subsequent departure of Sweet Lou for greener pastures after '92. Then the Indians soon hit the jackpot with Jacob's Field and a great young team to erode the fan support in Central Ohio.

    The arrival of Griffey after the great 1999 run had all the potential of 3M attendance seasons (and they would have gotten there in 2000 with a seriously contending team). But the buzz of 2000 quickly faded and the halo of KGJ's arrival was lost in the injuries/unfair piling on by the local press.

    Finally 2011 looked so full of promise for back to back playoff runs. Toss in a seriously underacheiving 44-45 record and overall uninspiring play -- just in time to derail another nice rise in the attendance trend. And low and behold, the Indians cleaned their clocks in the season series and are sitting in first place...
    my thoughts exactly.

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,760

    Re: Reds attendence article in Cincinnati Magazine

    But facts are facts, and the Reds have less people to draw from than do most other teams. As Brutus pointed out:
    What this means is that fewer people are within striking distance to go to a baseball game on a given weeknight. So that the Reds aren't a huge attendance town isn't so much an indictment on the city or the fanbase as much as it is a consequence of the geographical makeup of the market and how people are more spread out than some markets are.

    This is why they draw well for weekend games but not so much during weeknight games during the school year. Families with kids can't make 1 or 2-hour drives on a school night or work night.
    I think the age of the population plays a part. Cincinnati is an older population age-wise, and a great number of local folks quite simply, aren't going to be out and about past 9:00 PM. Even the traditional 11:00 PM newscasts are losing viewers, opting for the 10:00 PM news.
    Opinions are like belly buttons. Everybody has one, and they don't want someone else's shoved into their face.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25