Reportedly between $21 and $25 million
http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/67...-year-contract
I don't think it matters now, but for those wondering, the contract only contains a limited no-trade clause of 8 restricted teams he would have to approve.
In other words, unless the Reds are on that list of eight, they theoretically could still acquire him. That obviously seems highly unlikely for a number of reasons.
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
That's an aggressive contract.
"Aggressive" here is a nice euphemism.Originally Posted by edabbs44
Good. Now the JJ Hardy speculation can end for at least this season.
And in related news, Renteria is starting for the Reds tonight.
Ugh. Double ugh.
I have a love-hate relationship with Albert Pujols. Mostly hate.
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Reply With Quote