Turn Off Ads?
Page 15 of 67 FirstFirst ... 51112131415161718192565 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 225 of 993

Thread: 2011 Bengals Discussion

  1. #211
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    343

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    Quote Originally Posted by LoganBuck View Post
    Bengals trade Clinton McDonald to Seattle for Kelly Jennings

    Ugh

    I liked McDonald, if my memory is right Jennings is terrible
    McDonald is nice, but the Bengals have a lot of depth at DL and very little at CB. He would be behind Peko, Sims, Fanene, and Atkins at least. And Jennings should be a good 3rd CB with a lot of promise. He was once a 1st round pick, so the potential is there.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #212
    Waitin til next year bucksfan2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    10,180

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    Bengals sign Hall for 4 more years. I liked J Joe better but Hall is a quality DB. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/69...rs-sources-say

  4. #213
    A Little to the Left Redsfaithful's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bexley, OH
    Posts
    7,466

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    Also just extended Cook.
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
    --Oscar Wilde

  5. #214
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,171

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    No complaints on the extensions.
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  6. #215
    Member Oxilon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,133

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    Ugh. Not a big fan of Cook. Maybe it's because he's playing next to garbage in Bobbie Williams and Nate Livings, but I've never been that impressed with him. I suppose it's easy to think he's good when he replaced Guicheck, but I still miss the days when Braham was the center.
    That hit was plenty fair. Atleast by a quarter of an inch.
    -Steve Stone

  7. #216
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    7,192

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    Oh swell....

    @GeoffHobsonCin
    Geoff Hobson
    #Bengals lose RG Bobbie Williams for first 4 games for violating NFL policy on performance enhancing substances
    When people say that I donít know what Iím talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
    ---Joe Posnanski

  8. #217
    Member CTA513's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    10,718

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoosier Red View Post
    Oh swell....

    @GeoffHobsonCin
    Geoff Hobson
    #Bengals lose RG Bobbie Williams for first 4 games for violating NFL policy on performance enhancing substances
    Someone let Bobbie know whatever he took isn't working.

  9. #218
    A Little to the Left Redsfaithful's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bexley, OH
    Posts
    7,466

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    Bengals claimed OL Mike McGlynn And TE Mickey Shuler; waived C Reggie Stephens And TE Chase Coffman.

    Also cut Quan Cosby and signed Brandon Tate.

    I'm bummed they cut Chase Coffman, I think he could have stretched the field and been helpful in 2 TE sets, but since Gresham will see a lot of balls maybe they just wanted blocking TEs as depth? Not sure.

    Not sure I understand the Brandon Tate signing. Cosby was decent with punts, played on every special teams unit, and I personally like Bernard Scott returning kicks. But maybe Scott is going to have a bigger role in the running game and they want to keep him healthy, if it's for that reason I'm good with it.
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
    --Oscar Wilde

  10. #219
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    343

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    I'm also disappointed to see Coffman go. I was hoping he would be an effective pass catching TE, but he never got any traction.

    I actually like the Brandon Tate signing. He's a good kick returner with good receiving skills as well. He was a 3rd round pick 3 years ago and probably would have gone much higher if he hadn't gotten injured his senior year at UNC. Cosby was solid, but I think Tate provides everything Cosby could with a lot more upside.

  11. #220
    '19 '40 '75 '76 '90
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    782

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    Tate was a good sign. I actually think the Bengals can win 7 games this year.

  12. #221
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    7,192

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    Reds

    Tate was a good sign. I actually think the Bengals can win 7 games this year.
    Ah for the glorious optimism of youth.
    When people say that I donít know what Iím talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
    ---Joe Posnanski

  13. #222
    BobC, get a legit F.O.! Mario-Rijo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Springfield, Ohio
    Posts
    9,052

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    Quote Originally Posted by Redsfaithful View Post
    Bengals claimed OL Mike McGlynn And TE Mickey Shuler; waived C Reggie Stephens And TE Chase Coffman.

    Also cut Quan Cosby and signed Brandon Tate.

    I'm bummed they cut Chase Coffman, I think he could have stretched the field and been helpful in 2 TE sets, but since Gresham will see a lot of balls maybe they just wanted blocking TEs as depth? Not sure.

    Not sure I understand the Brandon Tate signing. Cosby was decent with punts, played on every special teams unit, and I personally like Bernard Scott returning kicks. But maybe Scott is going to have a bigger role in the running game and they want to keep him healthy, if it's for that reason I'm good with it.
    Waived/released/did not complete signing Mickey Schuler (did not pass physical). Coffman made it to the practice squad.

    I'm hoping they go after Donald Lee TE who was cut by Philly. He's a decent backup TE in a W/C who has some experience. A better fit than most out there. If not him I wish they would take a look at rookie TE Lee Smith waived by N.E. played at Marshall and is a big stout boy at 6' 6" and 270 lbs. They have one spot open and they are not assured to sign a TE for that spot according to Marvin but they do plan to fill it in the next day or so (at this point).
    Last edited by Mario-Rijo; 09-06-2011 at 08:40 AM.
    "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

    --Woody Hayes

  14. #223
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    i expect 1 to 3 wins . would like to see 9 or more wins but i'm not gonna lose any sleep over it . it's what happen when your a bengal fan for over 35 years .

  15. #224
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,834

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    Looking good so far, but wow the Browns are embarrassing 1 quarter in.

  16. #225
    Member CTA513's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    10,718

    Re: How bad are the Bengals going to be next year?

    14-13 Browns


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25